Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond?

W. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics is rapidly growing, and the interest in scientometric indicators is constantly rising, the field is in a crisis: subfields are drifting apart, the field is lacking consensus in basic questions and of internal communication, the quality of scientometric research is questioned by other disciplines. Among the causes stated are: the loss of integrating personalities; shift from basic and methodological research to applied bibliometrics; domination of the interests of science policy and business in commissioning and funding research; vendor policies and failing quality-management on the side of database-producers; misuse of bibliometric research results and disregard for scientific standards. To overcome the situation, the authors plead for integrative and interdisciplinary research approaches, for reinforcing fundamental, methodological and experimental research programs in scientometrics, for independent funding of research, and for an enhancement of scientometric databases. The need for acknowledged technical and scientific standards in research and publication is stressed. Finally, the establishment of a Code of Ethics for the field of scientometrics is proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-384
Number of pages10
JournalScientometrics
Volume30
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1994

Fingerprint

funding
development of methods
basic research
science policy
interdisciplinary research
quality management
research approach
research results
domination
producer
personality
moral philosophy
Quality management
cause
communication
Communication
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond? / Glänzel, W.; Schoepflin, U.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 30, No. 2-3, 06.1994, p. 375-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glänzel, W. ; Schoepflin, U. / Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond?. In: Scientometrics. 1994 ; Vol. 30, No. 2-3. pp. 375-384.
@article{267ea68d921342c7b564c764d1eca5d5,
title = "Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond?",
abstract = "Although the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics is rapidly growing, and the interest in scientometric indicators is constantly rising, the field is in a crisis: subfields are drifting apart, the field is lacking consensus in basic questions and of internal communication, the quality of scientometric research is questioned by other disciplines. Among the causes stated are: the loss of integrating personalities; shift from basic and methodological research to applied bibliometrics; domination of the interests of science policy and business in commissioning and funding research; vendor policies and failing quality-management on the side of database-producers; misuse of bibliometric research results and disregard for scientific standards. To overcome the situation, the authors plead for integrative and interdisciplinary research approaches, for reinforcing fundamental, methodological and experimental research programs in scientometrics, for independent funding of research, and for an enhancement of scientometric databases. The need for acknowledged technical and scientific standards in research and publication is stressed. Finally, the establishment of a Code of Ethics for the field of scientometrics is proposed.",
author = "W. Gl{\"a}nzel and U. Schoepflin",
year = "1994",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF02018107",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "375--384",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond?

AU - Glänzel, W.

AU - Schoepflin, U.

PY - 1994/6

Y1 - 1994/6

N2 - Although the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics is rapidly growing, and the interest in scientometric indicators is constantly rising, the field is in a crisis: subfields are drifting apart, the field is lacking consensus in basic questions and of internal communication, the quality of scientometric research is questioned by other disciplines. Among the causes stated are: the loss of integrating personalities; shift from basic and methodological research to applied bibliometrics; domination of the interests of science policy and business in commissioning and funding research; vendor policies and failing quality-management on the side of database-producers; misuse of bibliometric research results and disregard for scientific standards. To overcome the situation, the authors plead for integrative and interdisciplinary research approaches, for reinforcing fundamental, methodological and experimental research programs in scientometrics, for independent funding of research, and for an enhancement of scientometric databases. The need for acknowledged technical and scientific standards in research and publication is stressed. Finally, the establishment of a Code of Ethics for the field of scientometrics is proposed.

AB - Although the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics is rapidly growing, and the interest in scientometric indicators is constantly rising, the field is in a crisis: subfields are drifting apart, the field is lacking consensus in basic questions and of internal communication, the quality of scientometric research is questioned by other disciplines. Among the causes stated are: the loss of integrating personalities; shift from basic and methodological research to applied bibliometrics; domination of the interests of science policy and business in commissioning and funding research; vendor policies and failing quality-management on the side of database-producers; misuse of bibliometric research results and disregard for scientific standards. To overcome the situation, the authors plead for integrative and interdisciplinary research approaches, for reinforcing fundamental, methodological and experimental research programs in scientometrics, for independent funding of research, and for an enhancement of scientometric databases. The need for acknowledged technical and scientific standards in research and publication is stressed. Finally, the establishment of a Code of Ethics for the field of scientometrics is proposed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009153864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009153864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02018107

DO - 10.1007/BF02018107

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 375

EP - 384

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2-3

ER -