Learning by imitation

A hierarchical approach

R. W. Byrne, A. E. Russon, P. J. Bauer, M. Chen, T. L. Chartrand, A. Y. Lee-Chai, J. A. Bargh, A. M. Colman, D. D. Cummins, J. Decety, J. Grezes, F. B M De Waal, H. D. Fishbein, M. Gardner, C. Heyes, M. Gattis, H. Bekkering, A. Wohlschlager, H. Hayne, M. Heimann & 23 others L. Huber, P. J M Jorion, S. A. Kuczai, J. D. Gory, Jr Xitco M.J., E. Mac Aogain, M. D. Matheson, D. M. Fragaszy, P. E. Midford, A. Miklósi, R. W. Mitchell, N. Motomora, H. L. Roitblat, D. Todt, M. Tomasello, B. Vereijken, H. T A Whiting, S. Vogt, D. Carey, S. C. Want, P. L. Harris, A. Whiten, T. R. Zentall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

458 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To explain social learning without invoking the cognitively complex concept of imitation, many learning mechanisms have been proposed. Borrowing an idea used routinely in cognitive psychology, we argue that most of these alternatives can be subsumed under a single process, priming, in which input increases the activation of stored internal representations. Imitation itself has generally been seen as a 'special faculty.' This has diverted much research towards the all-or-none question of whether an animal can imitate, with disappointingly inconclusive results. In the great apes, however, voluntary, learned behaviours is organized hierarchically. This means that imitation can occur at various levels, of which we single out two clearly distinct ones: the 'action level,' a rather detailed and linear specification of sequential acts, and the 'program level,' a broader description of subroutine structure and the hierarchical layout of a behavioural 'program.' Program level imitation is a high-level, constructive mechanism, adapted for the efficient learning of complex skills and thus not evident in the simple manipulations used to test for imitation in the laboratory. As examples, we describe the food-preparation techniques of wild mountain gorillas and the imitative behaviour of orangutans undergoing 'rehabilitation' to the wild. Representing and manipulating relations between objects seems to be one basic building block in their hierarchical programs. There is evidence that great apes suffer from a stricter capacity limit than humans in the hierarchical depth of planning. We re-interpret some chimpanzee behaviour previously described as 'emulation' and suggest that all great apes may be able to imitate at the program level. Action level imitation is seldom observed in great ape skill learning, and may have a largely social role, even in humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)667-721
Number of pages55
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

imitation
Hominidae
Pongidae
learning
Learning
Imitative Behavior
Pongo
Gorilla gorilla
Pongo pygmaeus
Pan troglodytes
food preparation
rehabilitation (people)
Gorilla
psychology
Rehabilitation
planning
mountains
Psychology
Food
Research

Keywords

  • Emulation
  • Great apes
  • Hierarchical organisation
  • Imitation
  • Priming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Byrne, R. W., Russon, A. E., Bauer, P. J., Chen, M., Chartrand, T. L., Lee-Chai, A. Y., ... Zentall, T. R. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5), 667-721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001745

Learning by imitation : A hierarchical approach. / Byrne, R. W.; Russon, A. E.; Bauer, P. J.; Chen, M.; Chartrand, T. L.; Lee-Chai, A. Y.; Bargh, J. A.; Colman, A. M.; Cummins, D. D.; Decety, J.; Grezes, J.; De Waal, F. B M; Fishbein, H. D.; Gardner, M.; Heyes, C.; Gattis, M.; Bekkering, H.; Wohlschlager, A.; Hayne, H.; Heimann, M.; Huber, L.; Jorion, P. J M; Kuczai, S. A.; Gory, J. D.; Xitco M.J., Jr; Mac Aogain, E.; Matheson, M. D.; Fragaszy, D. M.; Midford, P. E.; Miklósi, A.; Mitchell, R. W.; Motomora, N.; Roitblat, H. L.; Todt, D.; Tomasello, M.; Vereijken, B.; Whiting, H. T A; Vogt, S.; Carey, D.; Want, S. C.; Harris, P. L.; Whiten, A.; Zentall, T. R.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1998, p. 667-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Byrne, RW, Russon, AE, Bauer, PJ, Chen, M, Chartrand, TL, Lee-Chai, AY, Bargh, JA, Colman, AM, Cummins, DD, Decety, J, Grezes, J, De Waal, FBM, Fishbein, HD, Gardner, M, Heyes, C, Gattis, M, Bekkering, H, Wohlschlager, A, Hayne, H, Heimann, M, Huber, L, Jorion, PJM, Kuczai, SA, Gory, JD, Xitco M.J., J, Mac Aogain, E, Matheson, MD, Fragaszy, DM, Midford, PE, Miklósi, A, Mitchell, RW, Motomora, N, Roitblat, HL, Todt, D, Tomasello, M, Vereijken, B, Whiting, HTA, Vogt, S, Carey, D, Want, SC, Harris, PL, Whiten, A & Zentall, TR 1998, 'Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 667-721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001745
Byrne RW, Russon AE, Bauer PJ, Chen M, Chartrand TL, Lee-Chai AY et al. Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998;21(5):667-721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001745
Byrne, R. W. ; Russon, A. E. ; Bauer, P. J. ; Chen, M. ; Chartrand, T. L. ; Lee-Chai, A. Y. ; Bargh, J. A. ; Colman, A. M. ; Cummins, D. D. ; Decety, J. ; Grezes, J. ; De Waal, F. B M ; Fishbein, H. D. ; Gardner, M. ; Heyes, C. ; Gattis, M. ; Bekkering, H. ; Wohlschlager, A. ; Hayne, H. ; Heimann, M. ; Huber, L. ; Jorion, P. J M ; Kuczai, S. A. ; Gory, J. D. ; Xitco M.J., Jr ; Mac Aogain, E. ; Matheson, M. D. ; Fragaszy, D. M. ; Midford, P. E. ; Miklósi, A. ; Mitchell, R. W. ; Motomora, N. ; Roitblat, H. L. ; Todt, D. ; Tomasello, M. ; Vereijken, B. ; Whiting, H. T A ; Vogt, S. ; Carey, D. ; Want, S. C. ; Harris, P. L. ; Whiten, A. ; Zentall, T. R. / Learning by imitation : A hierarchical approach. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 667-721.
@article{eff3ad1b7c30455c9b4f4088eff9cf15,
title = "Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach",
abstract = "To explain social learning without invoking the cognitively complex concept of imitation, many learning mechanisms have been proposed. Borrowing an idea used routinely in cognitive psychology, we argue that most of these alternatives can be subsumed under a single process, priming, in which input increases the activation of stored internal representations. Imitation itself has generally been seen as a 'special faculty.' This has diverted much research towards the all-or-none question of whether an animal can imitate, with disappointingly inconclusive results. In the great apes, however, voluntary, learned behaviours is organized hierarchically. This means that imitation can occur at various levels, of which we single out two clearly distinct ones: the 'action level,' a rather detailed and linear specification of sequential acts, and the 'program level,' a broader description of subroutine structure and the hierarchical layout of a behavioural 'program.' Program level imitation is a high-level, constructive mechanism, adapted for the efficient learning of complex skills and thus not evident in the simple manipulations used to test for imitation in the laboratory. As examples, we describe the food-preparation techniques of wild mountain gorillas and the imitative behaviour of orangutans undergoing 'rehabilitation' to the wild. Representing and manipulating relations between objects seems to be one basic building block in their hierarchical programs. There is evidence that great apes suffer from a stricter capacity limit than humans in the hierarchical depth of planning. We re-interpret some chimpanzee behaviour previously described as 'emulation' and suggest that all great apes may be able to imitate at the program level. Action level imitation is seldom observed in great ape skill learning, and may have a largely social role, even in humans.",
keywords = "Emulation, Great apes, Hierarchical organisation, Imitation, Priming",
author = "Byrne, {R. W.} and Russon, {A. E.} and Bauer, {P. J.} and M. Chen and Chartrand, {T. L.} and Lee-Chai, {A. Y.} and Bargh, {J. A.} and Colman, {A. M.} and Cummins, {D. D.} and J. Decety and J. Grezes and {De Waal}, {F. B M} and Fishbein, {H. D.} and M. Gardner and C. Heyes and M. Gattis and H. Bekkering and A. Wohlschlager and H. Hayne and M. Heimann and L. Huber and Jorion, {P. J M} and Kuczai, {S. A.} and Gory, {J. D.} and {Xitco M.J.}, Jr and {Mac Aogain}, E. and Matheson, {M. D.} and Fragaszy, {D. M.} and Midford, {P. E.} and A. Mikl{\'o}si and Mitchell, {R. W.} and N. Motomora and Roitblat, {H. L.} and D. Todt and M. Tomasello and B. Vereijken and Whiting, {H. T A} and S. Vogt and D. Carey and Want, {S. C.} and Harris, {P. L.} and A. Whiten and Zentall, {T. R.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X98001745",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "667--721",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning by imitation

T2 - A hierarchical approach

AU - Byrne, R. W.

AU - Russon, A. E.

AU - Bauer, P. J.

AU - Chen, M.

AU - Chartrand, T. L.

AU - Lee-Chai, A. Y.

AU - Bargh, J. A.

AU - Colman, A. M.

AU - Cummins, D. D.

AU - Decety, J.

AU - Grezes, J.

AU - De Waal, F. B M

AU - Fishbein, H. D.

AU - Gardner, M.

AU - Heyes, C.

AU - Gattis, M.

AU - Bekkering, H.

AU - Wohlschlager, A.

AU - Hayne, H.

AU - Heimann, M.

AU - Huber, L.

AU - Jorion, P. J M

AU - Kuczai, S. A.

AU - Gory, J. D.

AU - Xitco M.J., Jr

AU - Mac Aogain, E.

AU - Matheson, M. D.

AU - Fragaszy, D. M.

AU - Midford, P. E.

AU - Miklósi, A.

AU - Mitchell, R. W.

AU - Motomora, N.

AU - Roitblat, H. L.

AU - Todt, D.

AU - Tomasello, M.

AU - Vereijken, B.

AU - Whiting, H. T A

AU - Vogt, S.

AU - Carey, D.

AU - Want, S. C.

AU - Harris, P. L.

AU - Whiten, A.

AU - Zentall, T. R.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - To explain social learning without invoking the cognitively complex concept of imitation, many learning mechanisms have been proposed. Borrowing an idea used routinely in cognitive psychology, we argue that most of these alternatives can be subsumed under a single process, priming, in which input increases the activation of stored internal representations. Imitation itself has generally been seen as a 'special faculty.' This has diverted much research towards the all-or-none question of whether an animal can imitate, with disappointingly inconclusive results. In the great apes, however, voluntary, learned behaviours is organized hierarchically. This means that imitation can occur at various levels, of which we single out two clearly distinct ones: the 'action level,' a rather detailed and linear specification of sequential acts, and the 'program level,' a broader description of subroutine structure and the hierarchical layout of a behavioural 'program.' Program level imitation is a high-level, constructive mechanism, adapted for the efficient learning of complex skills and thus not evident in the simple manipulations used to test for imitation in the laboratory. As examples, we describe the food-preparation techniques of wild mountain gorillas and the imitative behaviour of orangutans undergoing 'rehabilitation' to the wild. Representing and manipulating relations between objects seems to be one basic building block in their hierarchical programs. There is evidence that great apes suffer from a stricter capacity limit than humans in the hierarchical depth of planning. We re-interpret some chimpanzee behaviour previously described as 'emulation' and suggest that all great apes may be able to imitate at the program level. Action level imitation is seldom observed in great ape skill learning, and may have a largely social role, even in humans.

AB - To explain social learning without invoking the cognitively complex concept of imitation, many learning mechanisms have been proposed. Borrowing an idea used routinely in cognitive psychology, we argue that most of these alternatives can be subsumed under a single process, priming, in which input increases the activation of stored internal representations. Imitation itself has generally been seen as a 'special faculty.' This has diverted much research towards the all-or-none question of whether an animal can imitate, with disappointingly inconclusive results. In the great apes, however, voluntary, learned behaviours is organized hierarchically. This means that imitation can occur at various levels, of which we single out two clearly distinct ones: the 'action level,' a rather detailed and linear specification of sequential acts, and the 'program level,' a broader description of subroutine structure and the hierarchical layout of a behavioural 'program.' Program level imitation is a high-level, constructive mechanism, adapted for the efficient learning of complex skills and thus not evident in the simple manipulations used to test for imitation in the laboratory. As examples, we describe the food-preparation techniques of wild mountain gorillas and the imitative behaviour of orangutans undergoing 'rehabilitation' to the wild. Representing and manipulating relations between objects seems to be one basic building block in their hierarchical programs. There is evidence that great apes suffer from a stricter capacity limit than humans in the hierarchical depth of planning. We re-interpret some chimpanzee behaviour previously described as 'emulation' and suggest that all great apes may be able to imitate at the program level. Action level imitation is seldom observed in great ape skill learning, and may have a largely social role, even in humans.

KW - Emulation

KW - Great apes

KW - Hierarchical organisation

KW - Imitation

KW - Priming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032426663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032426663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X98001745

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X98001745

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 667

EP - 721

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 5

ER -