Late Cenozoic evolution of the Pannonian basin

L. Stegena, B. Géczy, F. Horváth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Palaeozoic-Mesozoic nucleus of the Pannonian basin is the result of the collision of the European and Gondwanic microplates. The present basin was formed in the Late Cenozoic by the subsidence of this nucleus. The sinking was brought about by an active mantle diapir which was generated by the subduction associated with the formation of the surrounding mountains. The evidence and consequences of the mantle diapir are as follows. 1. (1) Strong Miocene andesitic-rhyolitic and Plio-Pleistocene basaltic volcanism. 2. (2) Geothermal highs and the high value of reduced heat flow (Qo = 1.2-1.7 HFU). 3. (3) Anomalous upper mantle with a lower density and elevated position of LVZ (low-velocity zone) and HCL (high-conductivity layer). The shallow depth of the HCL (40-60 km) shows that the geothermal highs are well developed in the upper mantle; this extra heat could not be the result of heat conduction only because of the young age (about 10 m.y.) of the basin, but convectionally transported heat has to be supposed as well. 4. (4) Continental-type thin crust, thinned out by the subcrustal erosion of the mantle diapir. The primary cause of the basin formation is the isostatic sinking of the thinnedout crust.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-90
Number of pages20
JournalTectonophysics
Volume26
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1975

Fingerprint

diapir
Earth mantle
mantle
upper mantle
conductivity
sinking
basin
crust
low velocity zone
microplate
basin evolution
crusts
heat flow
volcanism
subsidence
subduction
Paleozoic
collision
heat
Miocene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Geophysics

Cite this

Late Cenozoic evolution of the Pannonian basin. / Stegena, L.; Géczy, B.; Horváth, F.

In: Tectonophysics, Vol. 26, No. 1-2, 1975, p. 71-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stegena, L. ; Géczy, B. ; Horváth, F. / Late Cenozoic evolution of the Pannonian basin. In: Tectonophysics. 1975 ; Vol. 26, No. 1-2. pp. 71-90.
@article{7821824b702c4f0fba0722c1e102c423,
title = "Late Cenozoic evolution of the Pannonian basin",
abstract = "The Palaeozoic-Mesozoic nucleus of the Pannonian basin is the result of the collision of the European and Gondwanic microplates. The present basin was formed in the Late Cenozoic by the subsidence of this nucleus. The sinking was brought about by an active mantle diapir which was generated by the subduction associated with the formation of the surrounding mountains. The evidence and consequences of the mantle diapir are as follows. 1. (1) Strong Miocene andesitic-rhyolitic and Plio-Pleistocene basaltic volcanism. 2. (2) Geothermal highs and the high value of reduced heat flow (Qo = 1.2-1.7 HFU). 3. (3) Anomalous upper mantle with a lower density and elevated position of LVZ (low-velocity zone) and HCL (high-conductivity layer). The shallow depth of the HCL (40-60 km) shows that the geothermal highs are well developed in the upper mantle; this extra heat could not be the result of heat conduction only because of the young age (about 10 m.y.) of the basin, but convectionally transported heat has to be supposed as well. 4. (4) Continental-type thin crust, thinned out by the subcrustal erosion of the mantle diapir. The primary cause of the basin formation is the isostatic sinking of the thinnedout crust.",
author = "L. Stegena and B. G{\'e}czy and F. Horv{\'a}th",
year = "1975",
doi = "10.1016/0040-1951(75)90114-6",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "71--90",
journal = "Tectonophysics",
issn = "0040-1951",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Late Cenozoic evolution of the Pannonian basin

AU - Stegena, L.

AU - Géczy, B.

AU - Horváth, F.

PY - 1975

Y1 - 1975

N2 - The Palaeozoic-Mesozoic nucleus of the Pannonian basin is the result of the collision of the European and Gondwanic microplates. The present basin was formed in the Late Cenozoic by the subsidence of this nucleus. The sinking was brought about by an active mantle diapir which was generated by the subduction associated with the formation of the surrounding mountains. The evidence and consequences of the mantle diapir are as follows. 1. (1) Strong Miocene andesitic-rhyolitic and Plio-Pleistocene basaltic volcanism. 2. (2) Geothermal highs and the high value of reduced heat flow (Qo = 1.2-1.7 HFU). 3. (3) Anomalous upper mantle with a lower density and elevated position of LVZ (low-velocity zone) and HCL (high-conductivity layer). The shallow depth of the HCL (40-60 km) shows that the geothermal highs are well developed in the upper mantle; this extra heat could not be the result of heat conduction only because of the young age (about 10 m.y.) of the basin, but convectionally transported heat has to be supposed as well. 4. (4) Continental-type thin crust, thinned out by the subcrustal erosion of the mantle diapir. The primary cause of the basin formation is the isostatic sinking of the thinnedout crust.

AB - The Palaeozoic-Mesozoic nucleus of the Pannonian basin is the result of the collision of the European and Gondwanic microplates. The present basin was formed in the Late Cenozoic by the subsidence of this nucleus. The sinking was brought about by an active mantle diapir which was generated by the subduction associated with the formation of the surrounding mountains. The evidence and consequences of the mantle diapir are as follows. 1. (1) Strong Miocene andesitic-rhyolitic and Plio-Pleistocene basaltic volcanism. 2. (2) Geothermal highs and the high value of reduced heat flow (Qo = 1.2-1.7 HFU). 3. (3) Anomalous upper mantle with a lower density and elevated position of LVZ (low-velocity zone) and HCL (high-conductivity layer). The shallow depth of the HCL (40-60 km) shows that the geothermal highs are well developed in the upper mantle; this extra heat could not be the result of heat conduction only because of the young age (about 10 m.y.) of the basin, but convectionally transported heat has to be supposed as well. 4. (4) Continental-type thin crust, thinned out by the subcrustal erosion of the mantle diapir. The primary cause of the basin formation is the isostatic sinking of the thinnedout crust.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001947549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001947549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0040-1951(75)90114-6

DO - 10.1016/0040-1951(75)90114-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001947549

VL - 26

SP - 71

EP - 90

JO - Tectonophysics

JF - Tectonophysics

SN - 0040-1951

IS - 1-2

ER -