Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention

Katalin Varga, Z. Németh, A. Székely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to measure the relationship between performance on various attentional tasks and hypnotic susceptibility. Healthy volunteers (N=116) participated in a study, where they had to perform several tasks measuring various attention components in a waking state: sustained attention, selective or focused attention, divided attention and executive attention in task switching. Hypnotic susceptibility was measured in a separate setting by the Waterloo-Stanford Groups Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (WSGC).We found no significant correlation between any of the attentional measures and hypnotic susceptibility. Highly hypnotizables did not prove to be superior to or worse than the other individuals in any of the tests.These results do not support the neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis, as they show no consistent relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and waking attentional performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1872-1881
Number of pages10
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Hypnotics and Sedatives
Hypnosis
Healthy Volunteers
Susceptibility

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Context effect
  • Hypnosis
  • Hypnotic susceptibility
  • Simon task

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention. / Varga, Katalin; Németh, Z.; Székely, A.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 1872-1881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fcb26efce81f49ea8f2351194794b5ac,
title = "Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention",
abstract = "The purpose of our study was to measure the relationship between performance on various attentional tasks and hypnotic susceptibility. Healthy volunteers (N=116) participated in a study, where they had to perform several tasks measuring various attention components in a waking state: sustained attention, selective or focused attention, divided attention and executive attention in task switching. Hypnotic susceptibility was measured in a separate setting by the Waterloo-Stanford Groups Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (WSGC).We found no significant correlation between any of the attentional measures and hypnotic susceptibility. Highly hypnotizables did not prove to be superior to or worse than the other individuals in any of the tests.These results do not support the neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis, as they show no consistent relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and waking attentional performance.",
keywords = "Attention, Context effect, Hypnosis, Hypnotic susceptibility, Simon task",
author = "Katalin Varga and Z. N{\'e}meth and A. Sz{\'e}kely",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.008",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1872--1881",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention

AU - Varga, Katalin

AU - Németh, Z.

AU - Székely, A.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - The purpose of our study was to measure the relationship between performance on various attentional tasks and hypnotic susceptibility. Healthy volunteers (N=116) participated in a study, where they had to perform several tasks measuring various attention components in a waking state: sustained attention, selective or focused attention, divided attention and executive attention in task switching. Hypnotic susceptibility was measured in a separate setting by the Waterloo-Stanford Groups Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (WSGC).We found no significant correlation between any of the attentional measures and hypnotic susceptibility. Highly hypnotizables did not prove to be superior to or worse than the other individuals in any of the tests.These results do not support the neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis, as they show no consistent relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and waking attentional performance.

AB - The purpose of our study was to measure the relationship between performance on various attentional tasks and hypnotic susceptibility. Healthy volunteers (N=116) participated in a study, where they had to perform several tasks measuring various attention components in a waking state: sustained attention, selective or focused attention, divided attention and executive attention in task switching. Hypnotic susceptibility was measured in a separate setting by the Waterloo-Stanford Groups Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (WSGC).We found no significant correlation between any of the attentional measures and hypnotic susceptibility. Highly hypnotizables did not prove to be superior to or worse than the other individuals in any of the tests.These results do not support the neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis, as they show no consistent relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and waking attentional performance.

KW - Attention

KW - Context effect

KW - Hypnosis

KW - Hypnotic susceptibility

KW - Simon task

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054868303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054868303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 21963402

AN - SCOPUS:80054868303

VL - 20

SP - 1872

EP - 1881

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

IS - 4

ER -