Interacting effect of two social factors on 18-month-old infants’ imitative behavior: Communicative cues and demonstrator presence

Krisztina Kupán, Ildikó Király, Kinga Kupán, Kata Krekó, A. Miklósi, J. Topál

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Certain aspects of a demonstration have been shown to influence infants’ interpretation of an observational situation and result in selective imitation. Studying social factors that trigger selective imitation may improve our understanding of how infants encode certain situations. However, only a few studies have investigated the possible interactions among these factors. In our study, 18-month-old infants (N = 54) observed an adult demonstrator retrieve a toy from under an opaque (“baited”) container by manipulating another transparent empty one. Infants were assigned to one of four conditions representing all combinations of two social factors: ostensive communication during demonstration (Communicative vs. Non-communicative) and presence of the demonstrator during reenactment (D-present vs. D-not present). Results suggest that infants’ choice behavior was formed in two steps: during the demonstration and during the test phase. Furthermore, an interaction between the effects of the two levels was observed. Communication during the demonstration triggered imitative learning. Infants tended to copy the observed manipulation to learn the communicatively assigned way to reach the goal. This choice behavior was not influenced later by the presence or absence of the demonstrator. The non-communicative demonstration, however, did not elicit a particular learning mechanism. Therefore, in this situation, infants’ choice behavior was affected by the demonstrator's presence or absence. Infants developed an individual solution and chose the baited container in the D-not present condition, indicative of emulation. In the D-present situation, they were more likely to reproduce the observed manipulation, which can be interpreted as a tendency to communicate with or conform to the demonstrator.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-194
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume161
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Imitative Behavior
Infant Behavior
Cues
Choice Behavior
Communication
Learning
Play and Playthings

Keywords

  • Communicative cues
  • Demonstrator's effect
  • Goal emulation
  • Imitation
  • Social affiliation
  • Social learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Interacting effect of two social factors on 18-month-old infants’ imitative behavior : Communicative cues and demonstrator presence. / Kupán, Krisztina; Király, Ildikó; Kupán, Kinga; Krekó, Kata; Miklósi, A.; Topál, J.

In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 161, 01.09.2017, p. 186-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f8da61d22b94e8481cadc4b0f8ed10a,
title = "Interacting effect of two social factors on 18-month-old infants’ imitative behavior: Communicative cues and demonstrator presence",
abstract = "Certain aspects of a demonstration have been shown to influence infants’ interpretation of an observational situation and result in selective imitation. Studying social factors that trigger selective imitation may improve our understanding of how infants encode certain situations. However, only a few studies have investigated the possible interactions among these factors. In our study, 18-month-old infants (N = 54) observed an adult demonstrator retrieve a toy from under an opaque (“baited”) container by manipulating another transparent empty one. Infants were assigned to one of four conditions representing all combinations of two social factors: ostensive communication during demonstration (Communicative vs. Non-communicative) and presence of the demonstrator during reenactment (D-present vs. D-not present). Results suggest that infants’ choice behavior was formed in two steps: during the demonstration and during the test phase. Furthermore, an interaction between the effects of the two levels was observed. Communication during the demonstration triggered imitative learning. Infants tended to copy the observed manipulation to learn the communicatively assigned way to reach the goal. This choice behavior was not influenced later by the presence or absence of the demonstrator. The non-communicative demonstration, however, did not elicit a particular learning mechanism. Therefore, in this situation, infants’ choice behavior was affected by the demonstrator's presence or absence. Infants developed an individual solution and chose the baited container in the D-not present condition, indicative of emulation. In the D-present situation, they were more likely to reproduce the observed manipulation, which can be interpreted as a tendency to communicate with or conform to the demonstrator.",
keywords = "Communicative cues, Demonstrator's effect, Goal emulation, Imitation, Social affiliation, Social learning",
author = "Krisztina Kup{\'a}n and Ildik{\'o} Kir{\'a}ly and Kinga Kup{\'a}n and Kata Krek{\'o} and A. Mikl{\'o}si and J. Top{\'a}l",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.019",
language = "English",
volume = "161",
pages = "186--194",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interacting effect of two social factors on 18-month-old infants’ imitative behavior

T2 - Communicative cues and demonstrator presence

AU - Kupán, Krisztina

AU - Király, Ildikó

AU - Kupán, Kinga

AU - Krekó, Kata

AU - Miklósi, A.

AU - Topál, J.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Certain aspects of a demonstration have been shown to influence infants’ interpretation of an observational situation and result in selective imitation. Studying social factors that trigger selective imitation may improve our understanding of how infants encode certain situations. However, only a few studies have investigated the possible interactions among these factors. In our study, 18-month-old infants (N = 54) observed an adult demonstrator retrieve a toy from under an opaque (“baited”) container by manipulating another transparent empty one. Infants were assigned to one of four conditions representing all combinations of two social factors: ostensive communication during demonstration (Communicative vs. Non-communicative) and presence of the demonstrator during reenactment (D-present vs. D-not present). Results suggest that infants’ choice behavior was formed in two steps: during the demonstration and during the test phase. Furthermore, an interaction between the effects of the two levels was observed. Communication during the demonstration triggered imitative learning. Infants tended to copy the observed manipulation to learn the communicatively assigned way to reach the goal. This choice behavior was not influenced later by the presence or absence of the demonstrator. The non-communicative demonstration, however, did not elicit a particular learning mechanism. Therefore, in this situation, infants’ choice behavior was affected by the demonstrator's presence or absence. Infants developed an individual solution and chose the baited container in the D-not present condition, indicative of emulation. In the D-present situation, they were more likely to reproduce the observed manipulation, which can be interpreted as a tendency to communicate with or conform to the demonstrator.

AB - Certain aspects of a demonstration have been shown to influence infants’ interpretation of an observational situation and result in selective imitation. Studying social factors that trigger selective imitation may improve our understanding of how infants encode certain situations. However, only a few studies have investigated the possible interactions among these factors. In our study, 18-month-old infants (N = 54) observed an adult demonstrator retrieve a toy from under an opaque (“baited”) container by manipulating another transparent empty one. Infants were assigned to one of four conditions representing all combinations of two social factors: ostensive communication during demonstration (Communicative vs. Non-communicative) and presence of the demonstrator during reenactment (D-present vs. D-not present). Results suggest that infants’ choice behavior was formed in two steps: during the demonstration and during the test phase. Furthermore, an interaction between the effects of the two levels was observed. Communication during the demonstration triggered imitative learning. Infants tended to copy the observed manipulation to learn the communicatively assigned way to reach the goal. This choice behavior was not influenced later by the presence or absence of the demonstrator. The non-communicative demonstration, however, did not elicit a particular learning mechanism. Therefore, in this situation, infants’ choice behavior was affected by the demonstrator's presence or absence. Infants developed an individual solution and chose the baited container in the D-not present condition, indicative of emulation. In the D-present situation, they were more likely to reproduce the observed manipulation, which can be interpreted as a tendency to communicate with or conform to the demonstrator.

KW - Communicative cues

KW - Demonstrator's effect

KW - Goal emulation

KW - Imitation

KW - Social affiliation

KW - Social learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018392157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018392157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 28476347

AN - SCOPUS:85018392157

VL - 161

SP - 186

EP - 194

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

ER -