Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects

D. Tihanyi, I. Gera, P. Eickholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects and to compare the accuracy with and without individual digital adjustment of brightness and contrast. Methods: In 41 periodontitis patients (19 females, 22 males; age range 23-73 years), 50 radiographs of 50 infrabony defects were obtained. All radiographs were digitized. Using a personal computer program, the linear distances between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar crest (AC) and between CEJ and bony defect (BD), and the depth of the infrabony defect (INFRA), were measured twice, according to the individual judgement of the radiographic examiner: (1) without digital adjustment (W) and (2) after use of contrast and brightness adjustment (A). Intrasurgical bone measurements served as the gold standard. The accuracy of measurements with or without digital adjustment was compared. Results: Radiographic measurements underestimated the gold standard for CEJ-BD (W: 1.1 mm±1.8 mm, P <0.001; A: 1.0 mm±1.9 mm, P 5 0.001). Both CEJ-AC (W: 0.2 mm±2.5 mm; A: 0.5 mm±2.6 mm) and INFRA (W: 20.4 mm±2.4 mm; A: 20.6 mm±2.5 mm) measurements came close to the gold standard. Statistically significant differences between W and A regarding accuracy were not observed. Conclusions: The measurement tool used in this study provided high-accuracy measurements of periodontal bone loss in INFRA. Individual brightness and contrast adjustment failed to improve accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-183
Number of pages7
JournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Dental Enamel
Alveolar Bone Loss
Periodontitis
Microcomputers
Software
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Periodontal bone loss
  • Periodontitis
  • Radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted
  • Radiology, diagnostic X-ray
  • Validity of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects. / Tihanyi, D.; Gera, I.; Eickholz, P.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 40, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 177-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38383775a77e480f96f526e26b0ba3eb,
title = "Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects and to compare the accuracy with and without individual digital adjustment of brightness and contrast. Methods: In 41 periodontitis patients (19 females, 22 males; age range 23-73 years), 50 radiographs of 50 infrabony defects were obtained. All radiographs were digitized. Using a personal computer program, the linear distances between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar crest (AC) and between CEJ and bony defect (BD), and the depth of the infrabony defect (INFRA), were measured twice, according to the individual judgement of the radiographic examiner: (1) without digital adjustment (W) and (2) after use of contrast and brightness adjustment (A). Intrasurgical bone measurements served as the gold standard. The accuracy of measurements with or without digital adjustment was compared. Results: Radiographic measurements underestimated the gold standard for CEJ-BD (W: 1.1 mm±1.8 mm, P <0.001; A: 1.0 mm±1.9 mm, P 5 0.001). Both CEJ-AC (W: 0.2 mm±2.5 mm; A: 0.5 mm±2.6 mm) and INFRA (W: 20.4 mm±2.4 mm; A: 20.6 mm±2.5 mm) measurements came close to the gold standard. Statistically significant differences between W and A regarding accuracy were not observed. Conclusions: The measurement tool used in this study provided high-accuracy measurements of periodontal bone loss in INFRA. Individual brightness and contrast adjustment failed to improve accuracy.",
keywords = "Periodontal bone loss, Periodontitis, Radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted, Radiology, diagnostic X-ray, Validity of results",
author = "D. Tihanyi and I. Gera and P. Eickholz",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1259/dmfr/56018062",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "177--183",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects

AU - Tihanyi, D.

AU - Gera, I.

AU - Eickholz, P.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Objectives: To assess the accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects and to compare the accuracy with and without individual digital adjustment of brightness and contrast. Methods: In 41 periodontitis patients (19 females, 22 males; age range 23-73 years), 50 radiographs of 50 infrabony defects were obtained. All radiographs were digitized. Using a personal computer program, the linear distances between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar crest (AC) and between CEJ and bony defect (BD), and the depth of the infrabony defect (INFRA), were measured twice, according to the individual judgement of the radiographic examiner: (1) without digital adjustment (W) and (2) after use of contrast and brightness adjustment (A). Intrasurgical bone measurements served as the gold standard. The accuracy of measurements with or without digital adjustment was compared. Results: Radiographic measurements underestimated the gold standard for CEJ-BD (W: 1.1 mm±1.8 mm, P <0.001; A: 1.0 mm±1.9 mm, P 5 0.001). Both CEJ-AC (W: 0.2 mm±2.5 mm; A: 0.5 mm±2.6 mm) and INFRA (W: 20.4 mm±2.4 mm; A: 20.6 mm±2.5 mm) measurements came close to the gold standard. Statistically significant differences between W and A regarding accuracy were not observed. Conclusions: The measurement tool used in this study provided high-accuracy measurements of periodontal bone loss in INFRA. Individual brightness and contrast adjustment failed to improve accuracy.

AB - Objectives: To assess the accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects and to compare the accuracy with and without individual digital adjustment of brightness and contrast. Methods: In 41 periodontitis patients (19 females, 22 males; age range 23-73 years), 50 radiographs of 50 infrabony defects were obtained. All radiographs were digitized. Using a personal computer program, the linear distances between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar crest (AC) and between CEJ and bony defect (BD), and the depth of the infrabony defect (INFRA), were measured twice, according to the individual judgement of the radiographic examiner: (1) without digital adjustment (W) and (2) after use of contrast and brightness adjustment (A). Intrasurgical bone measurements served as the gold standard. The accuracy of measurements with or without digital adjustment was compared. Results: Radiographic measurements underestimated the gold standard for CEJ-BD (W: 1.1 mm±1.8 mm, P <0.001; A: 1.0 mm±1.9 mm, P 5 0.001). Both CEJ-AC (W: 0.2 mm±2.5 mm; A: 0.5 mm±2.6 mm) and INFRA (W: 20.4 mm±2.4 mm; A: 20.6 mm±2.5 mm) measurements came close to the gold standard. Statistically significant differences between W and A regarding accuracy were not observed. Conclusions: The measurement tool used in this study provided high-accuracy measurements of periodontal bone loss in INFRA. Individual brightness and contrast adjustment failed to improve accuracy.

KW - Periodontal bone loss

KW - Periodontitis

KW - Radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted

KW - Radiology, diagnostic X-ray

KW - Validity of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952182394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952182394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/dmfr/56018062

DO - 10.1259/dmfr/56018062

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 177

EP - 183

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

IS - 3

ER -