Influence of diabetes mellitus on inappropriate and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and mortality in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-reduce inappropriate therapy (MADIT-RIT) trial

Martin H. Ruwald, Wojciech Zareba, Christian Jons, Claire Zhang, Anne Christine H. Ruwald, Brian Olshansky, Scott McNitt, Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen, Morio Shoda, Bela Merkely, Arthur J. Moss, Valentina Kutyifa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-The relationship between diabetes mellitus and risk of inappropriate or appropriate therapy in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and resynchronization therapy has not been investigated thoroughly. The effect of innovative ICD programming on therapy delivery in these patients is unknown. Methods and Results-The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) randomized patients with a primary prophylactic ICD indication to 3 different types of ICD programming: conventional programming with a ventricular tachycardia zone of 170 to 199 bpm (arm A), high-rate cutoff with a ventricular tachycardia zone =200 bpm (arm B), or 60-second-delayed therapy (arm C). The end points of inappropriate therapy, appropriate therapy, and death were assessed among 485 patients with and 998 without diabetes mellitus. Innovative ICD programming reduced the risk of inappropriate therapy regardless of diabetes mellitus, although a trend toward a more pronounced effect of high-rate cutoff programming was seen in patients without diabetes mellitus (P for interaction=0.06). Diabetes mellitus was associated with a decreased risk of inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.80; P=0.002) and increased risk of appropriate therapy (hazard ratio,1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.14; P=0.003). In diabetic patients, there was significantly increased risk of death in those who had inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-11.40; P=0.005) and appropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.87; P=0.037) compared with those who did not. Conclusions-Innovative high-rate cutoff or delayed ICD programming was associated with a reduction in inappropriate therapy in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus was associated with lower risk of inappropriate therapy but higher risk of appropriate therapy. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy was associated with increased mortality in diabetic patients. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00947310.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)694-701
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation
Volume128
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 13 2013

Keywords

  • Defibrillators
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Heart failure
  • Implantable
  • Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of diabetes mellitus on inappropriate and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and mortality in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-reduce inappropriate therapy (MADIT-RIT) trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this