Individual Positioning

A Comparative Study of Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy in the Prone Versus Supine Position

Zoltán Varga, K. Hideghéty, Tamás Mezo, Alíz Nikolényi, L. Thurzó, Z. Kahán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To study breast radiotherapy in the prone vs. supine positions through dosimetry and clinical implementation. Methods and Materials: Conformal radiotherapy plans in 61 patients requiring only breast irradiation were developed for both the prone and supine positions. After evaluation of the of the first 20 plan pairs, the patients were irradiated in the prone or supine position in a randomized fashion. These cases were analyzed for repositioning accuracy and skin reactions related to treatment position and patient characteristics. Results: The planning target volume covered with 47.5-53.5 Gy in the prone vs. the supine position was 85.1% ± 4.2% vs. 89.2 ± 2.2%, respectively (p <0.0001). Radiation exposure of the ipsilateral lung, expressed in terms of the mean lung dose and the V20Gy, was dramatically lower in the prone vs. supine position (p <0.0001), but the doses to the heart did not differ. There was no difference in the need to correct positioning during radiotherapy, but the extent of displacement was significantly higher in the prone vs. supine position (p = 0.021). The repositioning accuracy in the prone position exhibited an improvement over time and did not depend on any patient-related parameters. Significantly more radiodermatitis of Grade 1-2 developed following prone vs. supine irradiation (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Conformal breast radiotherapy is feasible in the prone position. Its primary advantage is the substantially lower radiation dose to the ipsilateral lung. The higher dose inhomogeneity and increased rate of Grade 1-2 skin toxicity, however, may be of concern.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-100
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

supine position
Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Supine Position
prone position
breast
positioning
radiation therapy
Prone Position
Breast
lungs
Conformal Radiotherapy
dosage
Lung
grade
Radiotherapy
Radiodermatitis
Skin
irradiation
radiation dosage
toxicity

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Conformal radiotherapy
  • Prone treatment position
  • Repositioning accuracy
  • Supine treatment position

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Individual Positioning : A Comparative Study of Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy in the Prone Versus Supine Position. / Varga, Zoltán; Hideghéty, K.; Mezo, Tamás; Nikolényi, Alíz; Thurzó, L.; Kahán, Z.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 75, No. 1, 01.09.2009, p. 94-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7aa2766e688b4d259a1f95d811d46650,
title = "Individual Positioning: A Comparative Study of Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy in the Prone Versus Supine Position",
abstract = "Purpose: To study breast radiotherapy in the prone vs. supine positions through dosimetry and clinical implementation. Methods and Materials: Conformal radiotherapy plans in 61 patients requiring only breast irradiation were developed for both the prone and supine positions. After evaluation of the of the first 20 plan pairs, the patients were irradiated in the prone or supine position in a randomized fashion. These cases were analyzed for repositioning accuracy and skin reactions related to treatment position and patient characteristics. Results: The planning target volume covered with 47.5-53.5 Gy in the prone vs. the supine position was 85.1{\%} ± 4.2{\%} vs. 89.2 ± 2.2{\%}, respectively (p <0.0001). Radiation exposure of the ipsilateral lung, expressed in terms of the mean lung dose and the V20Gy, was dramatically lower in the prone vs. supine position (p <0.0001), but the doses to the heart did not differ. There was no difference in the need to correct positioning during radiotherapy, but the extent of displacement was significantly higher in the prone vs. supine position (p = 0.021). The repositioning accuracy in the prone position exhibited an improvement over time and did not depend on any patient-related parameters. Significantly more radiodermatitis of Grade 1-2 developed following prone vs. supine irradiation (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Conformal breast radiotherapy is feasible in the prone position. Its primary advantage is the substantially lower radiation dose to the ipsilateral lung. The higher dose inhomogeneity and increased rate of Grade 1-2 skin toxicity, however, may be of concern.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Conformal radiotherapy, Prone treatment position, Repositioning accuracy, Supine treatment position",
author = "Zolt{\'a}n Varga and K. Hidegh{\'e}ty and Tam{\'a}s Mezo and Al{\'i}z Nikol{\'e}nyi and L. Thurz{\'o} and Z. Kah{\'a}n",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "94--100",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual Positioning

T2 - A Comparative Study of Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy in the Prone Versus Supine Position

AU - Varga, Zoltán

AU - Hideghéty, K.

AU - Mezo, Tamás

AU - Nikolényi, Alíz

AU - Thurzó, L.

AU - Kahán, Z.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To study breast radiotherapy in the prone vs. supine positions through dosimetry and clinical implementation. Methods and Materials: Conformal radiotherapy plans in 61 patients requiring only breast irradiation were developed for both the prone and supine positions. After evaluation of the of the first 20 plan pairs, the patients were irradiated in the prone or supine position in a randomized fashion. These cases were analyzed for repositioning accuracy and skin reactions related to treatment position and patient characteristics. Results: The planning target volume covered with 47.5-53.5 Gy in the prone vs. the supine position was 85.1% ± 4.2% vs. 89.2 ± 2.2%, respectively (p <0.0001). Radiation exposure of the ipsilateral lung, expressed in terms of the mean lung dose and the V20Gy, was dramatically lower in the prone vs. supine position (p <0.0001), but the doses to the heart did not differ. There was no difference in the need to correct positioning during radiotherapy, but the extent of displacement was significantly higher in the prone vs. supine position (p = 0.021). The repositioning accuracy in the prone position exhibited an improvement over time and did not depend on any patient-related parameters. Significantly more radiodermatitis of Grade 1-2 developed following prone vs. supine irradiation (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Conformal breast radiotherapy is feasible in the prone position. Its primary advantage is the substantially lower radiation dose to the ipsilateral lung. The higher dose inhomogeneity and increased rate of Grade 1-2 skin toxicity, however, may be of concern.

AB - Purpose: To study breast radiotherapy in the prone vs. supine positions through dosimetry and clinical implementation. Methods and Materials: Conformal radiotherapy plans in 61 patients requiring only breast irradiation were developed for both the prone and supine positions. After evaluation of the of the first 20 plan pairs, the patients were irradiated in the prone or supine position in a randomized fashion. These cases were analyzed for repositioning accuracy and skin reactions related to treatment position and patient characteristics. Results: The planning target volume covered with 47.5-53.5 Gy in the prone vs. the supine position was 85.1% ± 4.2% vs. 89.2 ± 2.2%, respectively (p <0.0001). Radiation exposure of the ipsilateral lung, expressed in terms of the mean lung dose and the V20Gy, was dramatically lower in the prone vs. supine position (p <0.0001), but the doses to the heart did not differ. There was no difference in the need to correct positioning during radiotherapy, but the extent of displacement was significantly higher in the prone vs. supine position (p = 0.021). The repositioning accuracy in the prone position exhibited an improvement over time and did not depend on any patient-related parameters. Significantly more radiodermatitis of Grade 1-2 developed following prone vs. supine irradiation (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Conformal breast radiotherapy is feasible in the prone position. Its primary advantage is the substantially lower radiation dose to the ipsilateral lung. The higher dose inhomogeneity and increased rate of Grade 1-2 skin toxicity, however, may be of concern.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Conformal radiotherapy

KW - Prone treatment position

KW - Repositioning accuracy

KW - Supine treatment position

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68649109610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68649109610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 94

EP - 100

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -