Hyper Open-Shell Excited Spin States of Transition-Metal Compounds: FeF2, FeF2⋯Ethane, and FeF2⋯Ethylene

Pragya Verma, Z. Varga, Donald G. Truhlar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spin-state energetics are important for understanding properties that involve more than one spin state, for example, catalysis occurring on two or more potential energy surfaces corresponding to different electronic spins. Very often, multiple-spin processes involve transition-metal compounds, and therefore, it is important to understand the electronic structure and energetics of such compounds in different spin states. In this work, we benchmark relative spin-state energies of FeF2 with respect to the quintet ground spin state using both single-configurational and multiconfigurational methods, and we examine how they are affected by the binding of ethane and ethylene to the iron center. We also benchmark the binding energies of the complexes. The single-configurational methods used in this work are the Hartree-Fock method, 32 exchange-correlation functionals, and the CCSD(T) coupled-cluster method in both restricted and unrestricted formalisms. The multiconfigurational methods that have been used are CASSCF, CASPT2, CASPT3, MRCI, MRCI+Q, and MR-ACPF. The spin-state splitting energies depend on the functional chosen, and of the 32 exchange-correlation functionals investigated here, we find that for the septet and spin-projected triplet states of FeF2 the M06 functional is the best when compared to our best estimates from multireference calculations. If all nine excitation energies are considered, where there are three excited spin states (singlet, triplet, and septet) for each of the three systems (FeF2, FeF2⋯ethane, and FeF2⋯ethylene), the three best-performing functionals are HLE16, SOGGA11-X, and M06-2X. We find that the binding of ethane perturbs the relative spin-state energy of FeF2 by only a small amount, but the stronger binding of ethylene has a larger effect. For the spin-state splitting energies of FeF2 using single-reference CCSD(T), we find that the predicted results depend very strongly on precisely how the calculations are done, in particular, on the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted character of the SCF reference state, which can differ even by around 50 kcal/mol for the SCF reference state and the subsequent CCSD(T) calculations. Upon analyzing the wave functions of both the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted formalisms, we find that the lowest-energy singlet and triplet states of the complexes, just like FeF2 in isolation, can have more unpaired electrons than they are usually assumed to have, i.e., they can be hyper open-shell electronic configurations, and this can significantly lower the energy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2563-2579
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume122
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 8 2018

Fingerprint

Transition metal compounds
metal compounds
Electron energy levels
transition metals
Ethane
Potential energy surfaces
Excitation energy
Wave functions
Binding energy
Catalysis
Electronic structure
Iron
functionals
atomic energy levels
Electrons
energy
ethane
self consistent fields
ethylene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Hyper Open-Shell Excited Spin States of Transition-Metal Compounds : FeF2, FeF2⋯Ethane, and FeF2⋯Ethylene. / Verma, Pragya; Varga, Z.; Truhlar, Donald G.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 122, No. 9, 08.03.2018, p. 2563-2579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecf58fb2552f41c2932e9f844623d910,
title = "Hyper Open-Shell Excited Spin States of Transition-Metal Compounds: FeF2, FeF2⋯Ethane, and FeF2⋯Ethylene",
abstract = "Spin-state energetics are important for understanding properties that involve more than one spin state, for example, catalysis occurring on two or more potential energy surfaces corresponding to different electronic spins. Very often, multiple-spin processes involve transition-metal compounds, and therefore, it is important to understand the electronic structure and energetics of such compounds in different spin states. In this work, we benchmark relative spin-state energies of FeF2 with respect to the quintet ground spin state using both single-configurational and multiconfigurational methods, and we examine how they are affected by the binding of ethane and ethylene to the iron center. We also benchmark the binding energies of the complexes. The single-configurational methods used in this work are the Hartree-Fock method, 32 exchange-correlation functionals, and the CCSD(T) coupled-cluster method in both restricted and unrestricted formalisms. The multiconfigurational methods that have been used are CASSCF, CASPT2, CASPT3, MRCI, MRCI+Q, and MR-ACPF. The spin-state splitting energies depend on the functional chosen, and of the 32 exchange-correlation functionals investigated here, we find that for the septet and spin-projected triplet states of FeF2 the M06 functional is the best when compared to our best estimates from multireference calculations. If all nine excitation energies are considered, where there are three excited spin states (singlet, triplet, and septet) for each of the three systems (FeF2, FeF2⋯ethane, and FeF2⋯ethylene), the three best-performing functionals are HLE16, SOGGA11-X, and M06-2X. We find that the binding of ethane perturbs the relative spin-state energy of FeF2 by only a small amount, but the stronger binding of ethylene has a larger effect. For the spin-state splitting energies of FeF2 using single-reference CCSD(T), we find that the predicted results depend very strongly on precisely how the calculations are done, in particular, on the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted character of the SCF reference state, which can differ even by around 50 kcal/mol for the SCF reference state and the subsequent CCSD(T) calculations. Upon analyzing the wave functions of both the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted formalisms, we find that the lowest-energy singlet and triplet states of the complexes, just like FeF2 in isolation, can have more unpaired electrons than they are usually assumed to have, i.e., they can be hyper open-shell electronic configurations, and this can significantly lower the energy.",
author = "Pragya Verma and Z. Varga and Truhlar, {Donald G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1021/acs.jpca.7b12652",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "2563--2579",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry A",
issn = "1089-5639",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hyper Open-Shell Excited Spin States of Transition-Metal Compounds

T2 - FeF2, FeF2⋯Ethane, and FeF2⋯Ethylene

AU - Verma, Pragya

AU - Varga, Z.

AU - Truhlar, Donald G.

PY - 2018/3/8

Y1 - 2018/3/8

N2 - Spin-state energetics are important for understanding properties that involve more than one spin state, for example, catalysis occurring on two or more potential energy surfaces corresponding to different electronic spins. Very often, multiple-spin processes involve transition-metal compounds, and therefore, it is important to understand the electronic structure and energetics of such compounds in different spin states. In this work, we benchmark relative spin-state energies of FeF2 with respect to the quintet ground spin state using both single-configurational and multiconfigurational methods, and we examine how they are affected by the binding of ethane and ethylene to the iron center. We also benchmark the binding energies of the complexes. The single-configurational methods used in this work are the Hartree-Fock method, 32 exchange-correlation functionals, and the CCSD(T) coupled-cluster method in both restricted and unrestricted formalisms. The multiconfigurational methods that have been used are CASSCF, CASPT2, CASPT3, MRCI, MRCI+Q, and MR-ACPF. The spin-state splitting energies depend on the functional chosen, and of the 32 exchange-correlation functionals investigated here, we find that for the septet and spin-projected triplet states of FeF2 the M06 functional is the best when compared to our best estimates from multireference calculations. If all nine excitation energies are considered, where there are three excited spin states (singlet, triplet, and septet) for each of the three systems (FeF2, FeF2⋯ethane, and FeF2⋯ethylene), the three best-performing functionals are HLE16, SOGGA11-X, and M06-2X. We find that the binding of ethane perturbs the relative spin-state energy of FeF2 by only a small amount, but the stronger binding of ethylene has a larger effect. For the spin-state splitting energies of FeF2 using single-reference CCSD(T), we find that the predicted results depend very strongly on precisely how the calculations are done, in particular, on the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted character of the SCF reference state, which can differ even by around 50 kcal/mol for the SCF reference state and the subsequent CCSD(T) calculations. Upon analyzing the wave functions of both the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted formalisms, we find that the lowest-energy singlet and triplet states of the complexes, just like FeF2 in isolation, can have more unpaired electrons than they are usually assumed to have, i.e., they can be hyper open-shell electronic configurations, and this can significantly lower the energy.

AB - Spin-state energetics are important for understanding properties that involve more than one spin state, for example, catalysis occurring on two or more potential energy surfaces corresponding to different electronic spins. Very often, multiple-spin processes involve transition-metal compounds, and therefore, it is important to understand the electronic structure and energetics of such compounds in different spin states. In this work, we benchmark relative spin-state energies of FeF2 with respect to the quintet ground spin state using both single-configurational and multiconfigurational methods, and we examine how they are affected by the binding of ethane and ethylene to the iron center. We also benchmark the binding energies of the complexes. The single-configurational methods used in this work are the Hartree-Fock method, 32 exchange-correlation functionals, and the CCSD(T) coupled-cluster method in both restricted and unrestricted formalisms. The multiconfigurational methods that have been used are CASSCF, CASPT2, CASPT3, MRCI, MRCI+Q, and MR-ACPF. The spin-state splitting energies depend on the functional chosen, and of the 32 exchange-correlation functionals investigated here, we find that for the septet and spin-projected triplet states of FeF2 the M06 functional is the best when compared to our best estimates from multireference calculations. If all nine excitation energies are considered, where there are three excited spin states (singlet, triplet, and septet) for each of the three systems (FeF2, FeF2⋯ethane, and FeF2⋯ethylene), the three best-performing functionals are HLE16, SOGGA11-X, and M06-2X. We find that the binding of ethane perturbs the relative spin-state energy of FeF2 by only a small amount, but the stronger binding of ethylene has a larger effect. For the spin-state splitting energies of FeF2 using single-reference CCSD(T), we find that the predicted results depend very strongly on precisely how the calculations are done, in particular, on the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted character of the SCF reference state, which can differ even by around 50 kcal/mol for the SCF reference state and the subsequent CCSD(T) calculations. Upon analyzing the wave functions of both the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted formalisms, we find that the lowest-energy singlet and triplet states of the complexes, just like FeF2 in isolation, can have more unpaired electrons than they are usually assumed to have, i.e., they can be hyper open-shell electronic configurations, and this can significantly lower the energy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043495478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043495478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b12652

DO - 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b12652

M3 - Article

C2 - 29420033

AN - SCOPUS:85043495478

VL - 122

SP - 2563

EP - 2579

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

SN - 1089-5639

IS - 9

ER -