How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis

Claire McCafferty, Liran Christine Shan, Robert Mooney, Clare O'Rourke, Kirsty Pourshahidi, B. Livingstone, John Kearney, Clare Corish, Mimi Tatlow-Golden, Celine Murrin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

One in four children on the Island of Ireland are overweight or obese. The consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods such as snacks, contribute to one fifth of children's calorie intake. However the snack food literature has failed to draw firm conclusions between snack food intake and obesity. Within this literature, the word snack and treat are used interchangeably, inconsistently and in differing contexts, which may explain the poor link between snacks or extra foods, and overweight or obesity. There is currently no academic definition of the word ‘treat’ relevant to an Irish population. Defining how adults perceive the treats they give children is of particular importance in the context of children's diets, and may provide insight into the relative contribution of treats to energy intakes. With ten focus groups of adult caregivers of children, across the Island of Ireland, this study aimed to investigate treat giving behaviour. This research highlights a paradoxical definition of treats: a treat was identified as an energy-dense food that gave pleasure, was deserved and believed to be infrequent; participants perceived this to be the true definition of treats which was coined “real treats”. However, in reality, treats were given and consumed frequently, downgrading the status of these treats to “regular treats” which reflected their real-life use. Developing the definition of treats for an adult population, may enhance our understanding of why adults give food treats to children, the role this has on the development of eating habits, the design of interventions and communication strategies to reduce the consumption of non-nutritive foods, labelled by adults as treats.

LanguageEnglish
Pages115-122
Number of pages8
JournalAppetite
Volume133
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Snacks
Pediatric Obesity
Health Behavior
Reward
Food
Ireland
Islands
Obesity
Pleasure
Feeding Behavior
Energy Intake
Focus Groups
Caregivers
Population
Eating
Communication
Diet
Research

Keywords

  • Childhood obesity
  • Food environment
  • Health behaviour
  • Reward
  • Snacking
  • Treats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

McCafferty, C., Shan, L. C., Mooney, R., O'Rourke, C., Pourshahidi, K., Livingstone, B., ... Murrin, C. (2019). How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis. Appetite, 133, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.027

How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis. / McCafferty, Claire; Shan, Liran Christine; Mooney, Robert; O'Rourke, Clare; Pourshahidi, Kirsty; Livingstone, B.; Kearney, John; Corish, Clare; Tatlow-Golden, Mimi; Murrin, Celine.

In: Appetite, Vol. 133, 01.02.2019, p. 115-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

McCafferty, C, Shan, LC, Mooney, R, O'Rourke, C, Pourshahidi, K, Livingstone, B, Kearney, J, Corish, C, Tatlow-Golden, M & Murrin, C 2019, 'How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis' Appetite, vol. 133, pp. 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.027
McCafferty C, Shan LC, Mooney R, O'Rourke C, Pourshahidi K, Livingstone B et al. How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis. Appetite. 2019 Feb 1;133:115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.027
McCafferty, Claire ; Shan, Liran Christine ; Mooney, Robert ; O'Rourke, Clare ; Pourshahidi, Kirsty ; Livingstone, B. ; Kearney, John ; Corish, Clare ; Tatlow-Golden, Mimi ; Murrin, Celine. / How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis. In: Appetite. 2019 ; Vol. 133. pp. 115-122.
@article{1a5dc865d5da4706930c40040bbaed4d,
title = "How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis",
abstract = "One in four children on the Island of Ireland are overweight or obese. The consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods such as snacks, contribute to one fifth of children's calorie intake. However the snack food literature has failed to draw firm conclusions between snack food intake and obesity. Within this literature, the word snack and treat are used interchangeably, inconsistently and in differing contexts, which may explain the poor link between snacks or extra foods, and overweight or obesity. There is currently no academic definition of the word ‘treat’ relevant to an Irish population. Defining how adults perceive the treats they give children is of particular importance in the context of children's diets, and may provide insight into the relative contribution of treats to energy intakes. With ten focus groups of adult caregivers of children, across the Island of Ireland, this study aimed to investigate treat giving behaviour. This research highlights a paradoxical definition of treats: a treat was identified as an energy-dense food that gave pleasure, was deserved and believed to be infrequent; participants perceived this to be the true definition of treats which was coined “real treats”. However, in reality, treats were given and consumed frequently, downgrading the status of these treats to “regular treats” which reflected their real-life use. Developing the definition of treats for an adult population, may enhance our understanding of why adults give food treats to children, the role this has on the development of eating habits, the design of interventions and communication strategies to reduce the consumption of non-nutritive foods, labelled by adults as treats.",
keywords = "Childhood obesity, Food environment, Health behaviour, Reward, Snacking, Treats",
author = "Claire McCafferty and Shan, {Liran Christine} and Robert Mooney and Clare O'Rourke and Kirsty Pourshahidi and B. Livingstone and John Kearney and Clare Corish and Mimi Tatlow-Golden and Celine Murrin",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.027",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "115--122",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do adults define the treats they give to children? A thematic analysis

AU - McCafferty, Claire

AU - Shan, Liran Christine

AU - Mooney, Robert

AU - O'Rourke, Clare

AU - Pourshahidi, Kirsty

AU - Livingstone, B.

AU - Kearney, John

AU - Corish, Clare

AU - Tatlow-Golden, Mimi

AU - Murrin, Celine

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - One in four children on the Island of Ireland are overweight or obese. The consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods such as snacks, contribute to one fifth of children's calorie intake. However the snack food literature has failed to draw firm conclusions between snack food intake and obesity. Within this literature, the word snack and treat are used interchangeably, inconsistently and in differing contexts, which may explain the poor link between snacks or extra foods, and overweight or obesity. There is currently no academic definition of the word ‘treat’ relevant to an Irish population. Defining how adults perceive the treats they give children is of particular importance in the context of children's diets, and may provide insight into the relative contribution of treats to energy intakes. With ten focus groups of adult caregivers of children, across the Island of Ireland, this study aimed to investigate treat giving behaviour. This research highlights a paradoxical definition of treats: a treat was identified as an energy-dense food that gave pleasure, was deserved and believed to be infrequent; participants perceived this to be the true definition of treats which was coined “real treats”. However, in reality, treats were given and consumed frequently, downgrading the status of these treats to “regular treats” which reflected their real-life use. Developing the definition of treats for an adult population, may enhance our understanding of why adults give food treats to children, the role this has on the development of eating habits, the design of interventions and communication strategies to reduce the consumption of non-nutritive foods, labelled by adults as treats.

AB - One in four children on the Island of Ireland are overweight or obese. The consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods such as snacks, contribute to one fifth of children's calorie intake. However the snack food literature has failed to draw firm conclusions between snack food intake and obesity. Within this literature, the word snack and treat are used interchangeably, inconsistently and in differing contexts, which may explain the poor link between snacks or extra foods, and overweight or obesity. There is currently no academic definition of the word ‘treat’ relevant to an Irish population. Defining how adults perceive the treats they give children is of particular importance in the context of children's diets, and may provide insight into the relative contribution of treats to energy intakes. With ten focus groups of adult caregivers of children, across the Island of Ireland, this study aimed to investigate treat giving behaviour. This research highlights a paradoxical definition of treats: a treat was identified as an energy-dense food that gave pleasure, was deserved and believed to be infrequent; participants perceived this to be the true definition of treats which was coined “real treats”. However, in reality, treats were given and consumed frequently, downgrading the status of these treats to “regular treats” which reflected their real-life use. Developing the definition of treats for an adult population, may enhance our understanding of why adults give food treats to children, the role this has on the development of eating habits, the design of interventions and communication strategies to reduce the consumption of non-nutritive foods, labelled by adults as treats.

KW - Childhood obesity

KW - Food environment

KW - Health behaviour

KW - Reward

KW - Snacking

KW - Treats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055750792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055750792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.027

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.027

M3 - Review article

VL - 133

SP - 115

EP - 122

JO - Appetite

T2 - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -