History of the peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the first millennium

A craniometric point of view

Gábor Holló, László Szathmáry, Antónia Marcsik, Z. Barta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We carried out an examination relying on six dimensions of 1,573 crania coming from the Great Hungarian Plain. The crania represent seven archeological periods: Sarmatian age (1-4th century), the period of transition (about 400-420), Hun and Gepidic epochs (about 420-455 and 455-567, respectively), early Avar age (about 568-670), late Avar period (about 670-895), the epoch of the Hungarian conquest and settlement (about 895-1000), and the Arpadian age (about 1000-1301). We were curious about the anatomical background behind cultural changes of the various populations that inhabited this area. After having noticed some discontinuities between the populations, as revealed by univariate analysis of single dimensions, we performed a principal-components analysis to see whether or not the diverse components showed eventual breaks in the sequence of the populations. Knowing that all the dominant populations had Asian roots, except for the Gepids of Germanic origin, we expected a considerable difference between the Gepidic population and all the other inhabitants. We also assumed that a conquest itself with a large-scale assimilation was unlikely to leave breaklike traits in anatomical patterns, except for aggressive conquests. We found that the second principal component (which correlated with cranial breadth and partly with height) showed a remarkable hiatus in both sexes between Gepids and early Avars. Having done a statistical proof (simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses) of the observed phenomenon, we found that the gap referring to subsequent populations was significant only in males. A possible reason for this result is that the Avar conquest was much more radical than has been thought. In addition, considering that men were more likely to die in wars, women survived and were assimilated into the conquerors' populations with higher probability, so it is not surprising that the results of multicomparison tests are significant only in men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-667
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Biology
Volume80
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

cranium
history
Population
cultural change
hiatus
Skull
principal component analysis
discontinuity
plain
Principal Component Analysis
testing
test
gender
woman
analysis
assimilation
inhabitant

Keywords

  • Avars
  • Craniometrics
  • Generalized linear mixed-effects model
  • Gepids
  • Great Hungarian Plain
  • History of human populations
  • Hungarians
  • Huns
  • Pairwise multiple comparisons of means
  • Sarmatians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

History of the peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the first millennium : A craniometric point of view. / Holló, Gábor; Szathmáry, László; Marcsik, Antónia; Barta, Z.

In: Human Biology, Vol. 80, No. 6, 2008, p. 655-667.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holló, Gábor ; Szathmáry, László ; Marcsik, Antónia ; Barta, Z. / History of the peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the first millennium : A craniometric point of view. In: Human Biology. 2008 ; Vol. 80, No. 6. pp. 655-667.
@article{9604e527b2634552b450e425852f5a14,
title = "History of the peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the first millennium: A craniometric point of view",
abstract = "We carried out an examination relying on six dimensions of 1,573 crania coming from the Great Hungarian Plain. The crania represent seven archeological periods: Sarmatian age (1-4th century), the period of transition (about 400-420), Hun and Gepidic epochs (about 420-455 and 455-567, respectively), early Avar age (about 568-670), late Avar period (about 670-895), the epoch of the Hungarian conquest and settlement (about 895-1000), and the Arpadian age (about 1000-1301). We were curious about the anatomical background behind cultural changes of the various populations that inhabited this area. After having noticed some discontinuities between the populations, as revealed by univariate analysis of single dimensions, we performed a principal-components analysis to see whether or not the diverse components showed eventual breaks in the sequence of the populations. Knowing that all the dominant populations had Asian roots, except for the Gepids of Germanic origin, we expected a considerable difference between the Gepidic population and all the other inhabitants. We also assumed that a conquest itself with a large-scale assimilation was unlikely to leave breaklike traits in anatomical patterns, except for aggressive conquests. We found that the second principal component (which correlated with cranial breadth and partly with height) showed a remarkable hiatus in both sexes between Gepids and early Avars. Having done a statistical proof (simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses) of the observed phenomenon, we found that the gap referring to subsequent populations was significant only in males. A possible reason for this result is that the Avar conquest was much more radical than has been thought. In addition, considering that men were more likely to die in wars, women survived and were assimilated into the conquerors' populations with higher probability, so it is not surprising that the results of multicomparison tests are significant only in men.",
keywords = "Avars, Craniometrics, Generalized linear mixed-effects model, Gepids, Great Hungarian Plain, History of human populations, Hungarians, Huns, Pairwise multiple comparisons of means, Sarmatians",
author = "G{\'a}bor Holl{\'o} and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Szathm{\'a}ry and Ant{\'o}nia Marcsik and Z. Barta",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.3378/1534-6617-80.6.655",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "655--667",
journal = "Human Biology",
issn = "0018-7143",
publisher = "Wayne State University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - History of the peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the first millennium

T2 - A craniometric point of view

AU - Holló, Gábor

AU - Szathmáry, László

AU - Marcsik, Antónia

AU - Barta, Z.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - We carried out an examination relying on six dimensions of 1,573 crania coming from the Great Hungarian Plain. The crania represent seven archeological periods: Sarmatian age (1-4th century), the period of transition (about 400-420), Hun and Gepidic epochs (about 420-455 and 455-567, respectively), early Avar age (about 568-670), late Avar period (about 670-895), the epoch of the Hungarian conquest and settlement (about 895-1000), and the Arpadian age (about 1000-1301). We were curious about the anatomical background behind cultural changes of the various populations that inhabited this area. After having noticed some discontinuities between the populations, as revealed by univariate analysis of single dimensions, we performed a principal-components analysis to see whether or not the diverse components showed eventual breaks in the sequence of the populations. Knowing that all the dominant populations had Asian roots, except for the Gepids of Germanic origin, we expected a considerable difference between the Gepidic population and all the other inhabitants. We also assumed that a conquest itself with a large-scale assimilation was unlikely to leave breaklike traits in anatomical patterns, except for aggressive conquests. We found that the second principal component (which correlated with cranial breadth and partly with height) showed a remarkable hiatus in both sexes between Gepids and early Avars. Having done a statistical proof (simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses) of the observed phenomenon, we found that the gap referring to subsequent populations was significant only in males. A possible reason for this result is that the Avar conquest was much more radical than has been thought. In addition, considering that men were more likely to die in wars, women survived and were assimilated into the conquerors' populations with higher probability, so it is not surprising that the results of multicomparison tests are significant only in men.

AB - We carried out an examination relying on six dimensions of 1,573 crania coming from the Great Hungarian Plain. The crania represent seven archeological periods: Sarmatian age (1-4th century), the period of transition (about 400-420), Hun and Gepidic epochs (about 420-455 and 455-567, respectively), early Avar age (about 568-670), late Avar period (about 670-895), the epoch of the Hungarian conquest and settlement (about 895-1000), and the Arpadian age (about 1000-1301). We were curious about the anatomical background behind cultural changes of the various populations that inhabited this area. After having noticed some discontinuities between the populations, as revealed by univariate analysis of single dimensions, we performed a principal-components analysis to see whether or not the diverse components showed eventual breaks in the sequence of the populations. Knowing that all the dominant populations had Asian roots, except for the Gepids of Germanic origin, we expected a considerable difference between the Gepidic population and all the other inhabitants. We also assumed that a conquest itself with a large-scale assimilation was unlikely to leave breaklike traits in anatomical patterns, except for aggressive conquests. We found that the second principal component (which correlated with cranial breadth and partly with height) showed a remarkable hiatus in both sexes between Gepids and early Avars. Having done a statistical proof (simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses) of the observed phenomenon, we found that the gap referring to subsequent populations was significant only in males. A possible reason for this result is that the Avar conquest was much more radical than has been thought. In addition, considering that men were more likely to die in wars, women survived and were assimilated into the conquerors' populations with higher probability, so it is not surprising that the results of multicomparison tests are significant only in men.

KW - Avars

KW - Craniometrics

KW - Generalized linear mixed-effects model

KW - Gepids

KW - Great Hungarian Plain

KW - History of human populations

KW - Hungarians

KW - Huns

KW - Pairwise multiple comparisons of means

KW - Sarmatians

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68049144588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68049144588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3378/1534-6617-80.6.655

DO - 10.3378/1534-6617-80.6.655

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 655

EP - 667

JO - Human Biology

JF - Human Biology

SN - 0018-7143

IS - 6

ER -