Help, I need to develop communication skills on donation

The "VIDEO" model

A. Smudla, S. Mihály, K. Hegedüs, B. Nemes, J. Fazakas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Information about brain stem death and donation can be influence the consent rate for donation and its psychosocial effects. The aim of this study was to create a "VIDEO" model that could be used to help physicians to develop communication skills. Methods: A video recorded 32 simulations of family interviews: 16 under-age and 16 adult donors. They were analyzed during 8 courses conducted in 2008 and 2009. During the VIDEO process, the visual presentation was followed by participants (n = 192) discussing interactively the donation situation. After the transcription of the video records, family interviews were explored retrospectively regarding informing relatives about brain stem death and donation, typical communication gaps and common questions from families. The data were examined qualitatively and semiquantitatively. We think that teaching can be optimized by our results. Results: A comprehensible explanation about brain stem death was provided to relatives in 65.63% of cases. The consent of the family was more important for the physicians than the application of the law in 93.75%; 78.13% of physicians emphasized altruism to support donation. Remarkable mistakes of communication included using the teams coma and brain stem death interchangeably (9.38%); applying expressions connected with life in the present tense (21.88%) and mechanically kept alive (21.88%); organ-focused behavior such as "organs to be usable" (34.38%). The frequent questions and statements of "relatives" were "heart beats" (100%), "did he really die?" (65.63%), "fear of loss of integrity of the corpse" (59.38%), and "wake up from the coma" (46.88%). Discussion: Interaction with the family requires great preparation. The communication skills of physicians can be developed through the VIDEO model. The results can be integrated into educational programs that consider the particular features of the given country.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1227-1229
Number of pages3
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Communication
Brain Death
Brain Stem
Physicians
Coma
Interviews
Altruism
Cadaver
Fear
Teaching
Tissue Donors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Help, I need to develop communication skills on donation : The "VIDEO" model. / Smudla, A.; Mihály, S.; Hegedüs, K.; Nemes, B.; Fazakas, J.

In: Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 43, No. 4, 05.2011, p. 1227-1229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smudla, A. ; Mihály, S. ; Hegedüs, K. ; Nemes, B. ; Fazakas, J. / Help, I need to develop communication skills on donation : The "VIDEO" model. In: Transplantation Proceedings. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 1227-1229.
@article{192c84043a374910936049d69373a211,
title = "Help, I need to develop communication skills on donation: The {"}VIDEO{"} model",
abstract = "Background: Information about brain stem death and donation can be influence the consent rate for donation and its psychosocial effects. The aim of this study was to create a {"}VIDEO{"} model that could be used to help physicians to develop communication skills. Methods: A video recorded 32 simulations of family interviews: 16 under-age and 16 adult donors. They were analyzed during 8 courses conducted in 2008 and 2009. During the VIDEO process, the visual presentation was followed by participants (n = 192) discussing interactively the donation situation. After the transcription of the video records, family interviews were explored retrospectively regarding informing relatives about brain stem death and donation, typical communication gaps and common questions from families. The data were examined qualitatively and semiquantitatively. We think that teaching can be optimized by our results. Results: A comprehensible explanation about brain stem death was provided to relatives in 65.63{\%} of cases. The consent of the family was more important for the physicians than the application of the law in 93.75{\%}; 78.13{\%} of physicians emphasized altruism to support donation. Remarkable mistakes of communication included using the teams coma and brain stem death interchangeably (9.38{\%}); applying expressions connected with life in the present tense (21.88{\%}) and mechanically kept alive (21.88{\%}); organ-focused behavior such as {"}organs to be usable{"} (34.38{\%}). The frequent questions and statements of {"}relatives{"} were {"}heart beats{"} (100{\%}), {"}did he really die?{"} (65.63{\%}), {"}fear of loss of integrity of the corpse{"} (59.38{\%}), and {"}wake up from the coma{"} (46.88{\%}). Discussion: Interaction with the family requires great preparation. The communication skills of physicians can be developed through the VIDEO model. The results can be integrated into educational programs that consider the particular features of the given country.",
author = "A. Smudla and S. Mih{\'a}ly and K. Heged{\"u}s and B. Nemes and J. Fazakas",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.03.073",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1227--1229",
journal = "Transplantation Proceedings",
issn = "0041-1345",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Help, I need to develop communication skills on donation

T2 - The "VIDEO" model

AU - Smudla, A.

AU - Mihály, S.

AU - Hegedüs, K.

AU - Nemes, B.

AU - Fazakas, J.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Background: Information about brain stem death and donation can be influence the consent rate for donation and its psychosocial effects. The aim of this study was to create a "VIDEO" model that could be used to help physicians to develop communication skills. Methods: A video recorded 32 simulations of family interviews: 16 under-age and 16 adult donors. They were analyzed during 8 courses conducted in 2008 and 2009. During the VIDEO process, the visual presentation was followed by participants (n = 192) discussing interactively the donation situation. After the transcription of the video records, family interviews were explored retrospectively regarding informing relatives about brain stem death and donation, typical communication gaps and common questions from families. The data were examined qualitatively and semiquantitatively. We think that teaching can be optimized by our results. Results: A comprehensible explanation about brain stem death was provided to relatives in 65.63% of cases. The consent of the family was more important for the physicians than the application of the law in 93.75%; 78.13% of physicians emphasized altruism to support donation. Remarkable mistakes of communication included using the teams coma and brain stem death interchangeably (9.38%); applying expressions connected with life in the present tense (21.88%) and mechanically kept alive (21.88%); organ-focused behavior such as "organs to be usable" (34.38%). The frequent questions and statements of "relatives" were "heart beats" (100%), "did he really die?" (65.63%), "fear of loss of integrity of the corpse" (59.38%), and "wake up from the coma" (46.88%). Discussion: Interaction with the family requires great preparation. The communication skills of physicians can be developed through the VIDEO model. The results can be integrated into educational programs that consider the particular features of the given country.

AB - Background: Information about brain stem death and donation can be influence the consent rate for donation and its psychosocial effects. The aim of this study was to create a "VIDEO" model that could be used to help physicians to develop communication skills. Methods: A video recorded 32 simulations of family interviews: 16 under-age and 16 adult donors. They were analyzed during 8 courses conducted in 2008 and 2009. During the VIDEO process, the visual presentation was followed by participants (n = 192) discussing interactively the donation situation. After the transcription of the video records, family interviews were explored retrospectively regarding informing relatives about brain stem death and donation, typical communication gaps and common questions from families. The data were examined qualitatively and semiquantitatively. We think that teaching can be optimized by our results. Results: A comprehensible explanation about brain stem death was provided to relatives in 65.63% of cases. The consent of the family was more important for the physicians than the application of the law in 93.75%; 78.13% of physicians emphasized altruism to support donation. Remarkable mistakes of communication included using the teams coma and brain stem death interchangeably (9.38%); applying expressions connected with life in the present tense (21.88%) and mechanically kept alive (21.88%); organ-focused behavior such as "organs to be usable" (34.38%). The frequent questions and statements of "relatives" were "heart beats" (100%), "did he really die?" (65.63%), "fear of loss of integrity of the corpse" (59.38%), and "wake up from the coma" (46.88%). Discussion: Interaction with the family requires great preparation. The communication skills of physicians can be developed through the VIDEO model. The results can be integrated into educational programs that consider the particular features of the given country.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957623795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957623795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.03.073

DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.03.073

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1227

EP - 1229

JO - Transplantation Proceedings

JF - Transplantation Proceedings

SN - 0041-1345

IS - 4

ER -