Fluorescence in situ hybridization of chorionic interphase cells for prenatal screening of Down syndrome

A. Tóth, Erika P. Tardy, Krisztina Hajdu, József Bátorfi, József Doszpod, Jenõ Egyed, István Gáti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to determine the usefulness and reliability of fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase chorionic villi cells in the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. Methods: A total of 336 samples of chorionic villi were analysed by direct chromosome preparation and FISH with a DNA probe specific to chromosome 21. The samples were obtained as part of the routine obstetric investigation and management. Results: The sampling and direct karyotyping was successful in all cases. At least 50 cells were valuable by FISH in 331 of 336 samples. Both methods showed Down syndrome in 12 cases. The follow-up investigations showed that there was no false-negative or false-positive result following these procedures. Conclusion: Based on these results and the fact that it is possible to analyse by interphase FISH at least ten times more cells than by conventional cytogenetic methods, and these cells originate from different tissues of chorionic villi, it is concluded that FISH increases the reliability of the diagnosis. Nevertheless, more data are needed for correct statistical analysis. Since this method is cheaper and gives diagnosis earlier than cell culture, the combination of direct chromosome preparation and FISH on chorionic villi is offered for prenatal Down syndrome screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-50
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Interphase
Chorionic Villi
Down Syndrome
Prenatal Diagnosis
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Chromosomes
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21
Karyotyping
DNA Probes
Cytogenetics
Obstetrics
Cell Culture Techniques

Keywords

  • Chorionic villi
  • Down syndrome
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • Prenatal screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Fluorescence in situ hybridization of chorionic interphase cells for prenatal screening of Down syndrome. / Tóth, A.; Tardy, Erika P.; Hajdu, Krisztina; Bátorfi, József; Doszpod, József; Egyed, Jenõ; Gáti, István.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2001, p. 46-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tóth, A. ; Tardy, Erika P. ; Hajdu, Krisztina ; Bátorfi, József ; Doszpod, József ; Egyed, Jenõ ; Gáti, István. / Fluorescence in situ hybridization of chorionic interphase cells for prenatal screening of Down syndrome. In: European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2001 ; Vol. 94, No. 1. pp. 46-50.
@article{93ea80a75fb94384aba5a1cc63b1747a,
title = "Fluorescence in situ hybridization of chorionic interphase cells for prenatal screening of Down syndrome",
abstract = "Objective: Our purpose was to determine the usefulness and reliability of fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase chorionic villi cells in the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. Methods: A total of 336 samples of chorionic villi were analysed by direct chromosome preparation and FISH with a DNA probe specific to chromosome 21. The samples were obtained as part of the routine obstetric investigation and management. Results: The sampling and direct karyotyping was successful in all cases. At least 50 cells were valuable by FISH in 331 of 336 samples. Both methods showed Down syndrome in 12 cases. The follow-up investigations showed that there was no false-negative or false-positive result following these procedures. Conclusion: Based on these results and the fact that it is possible to analyse by interphase FISH at least ten times more cells than by conventional cytogenetic methods, and these cells originate from different tissues of chorionic villi, it is concluded that FISH increases the reliability of the diagnosis. Nevertheless, more data are needed for correct statistical analysis. Since this method is cheaper and gives diagnosis earlier than cell culture, the combination of direct chromosome preparation and FISH on chorionic villi is offered for prenatal Down syndrome screening.",
keywords = "Chorionic villi, Down syndrome, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Prenatal screening",
author = "A. T{\'o}th and Tardy, {Erika P.} and Krisztina Hajdu and J{\'o}zsef B{\'a}torfi and J{\'o}zsef Doszpod and Jen{\~o} Egyed and Istv{\'a}n G{\'a}ti",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00310-9",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "46--50",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0028-2243",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fluorescence in situ hybridization of chorionic interphase cells for prenatal screening of Down syndrome

AU - Tóth, A.

AU - Tardy, Erika P.

AU - Hajdu, Krisztina

AU - Bátorfi, József

AU - Doszpod, József

AU - Egyed, Jenõ

AU - Gáti, István

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: Our purpose was to determine the usefulness and reliability of fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase chorionic villi cells in the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. Methods: A total of 336 samples of chorionic villi were analysed by direct chromosome preparation and FISH with a DNA probe specific to chromosome 21. The samples were obtained as part of the routine obstetric investigation and management. Results: The sampling and direct karyotyping was successful in all cases. At least 50 cells were valuable by FISH in 331 of 336 samples. Both methods showed Down syndrome in 12 cases. The follow-up investigations showed that there was no false-negative or false-positive result following these procedures. Conclusion: Based on these results and the fact that it is possible to analyse by interphase FISH at least ten times more cells than by conventional cytogenetic methods, and these cells originate from different tissues of chorionic villi, it is concluded that FISH increases the reliability of the diagnosis. Nevertheless, more data are needed for correct statistical analysis. Since this method is cheaper and gives diagnosis earlier than cell culture, the combination of direct chromosome preparation and FISH on chorionic villi is offered for prenatal Down syndrome screening.

AB - Objective: Our purpose was to determine the usefulness and reliability of fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase chorionic villi cells in the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. Methods: A total of 336 samples of chorionic villi were analysed by direct chromosome preparation and FISH with a DNA probe specific to chromosome 21. The samples were obtained as part of the routine obstetric investigation and management. Results: The sampling and direct karyotyping was successful in all cases. At least 50 cells were valuable by FISH in 331 of 336 samples. Both methods showed Down syndrome in 12 cases. The follow-up investigations showed that there was no false-negative or false-positive result following these procedures. Conclusion: Based on these results and the fact that it is possible to analyse by interphase FISH at least ten times more cells than by conventional cytogenetic methods, and these cells originate from different tissues of chorionic villi, it is concluded that FISH increases the reliability of the diagnosis. Nevertheless, more data are needed for correct statistical analysis. Since this method is cheaper and gives diagnosis earlier than cell culture, the combination of direct chromosome preparation and FISH on chorionic villi is offered for prenatal Down syndrome screening.

KW - Chorionic villi

KW - Down syndrome

KW - Fluorescence in situ hybridization

KW - Prenatal screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035178734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035178734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00310-9

DO - 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00310-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 11134825

AN - SCOPUS:0035178734

VL - 94

SP - 46

EP - 50

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0028-2243

IS - 1

ER -