FDG, MET or CHO? The quest for the optimal PET tracer for glioma imaging continues

Balázs Gulyás, István Nyáry, Katalin Borbély

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

13 Citations (Scopus)


This Practice Point commentary discusses a study by Kato et al. that assessed the usefulness of three PET tracers-11C-methionine (MET), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, and 11C-choline-for the metabolic evaluation of gliomas. The authors measured the ratio of tumor uptake to normal brain uptake (T/N ratio), with the frontal cortex as reference region, and analyzed the correlations between tracer uptake and tumor grade, type, and proliferation activity. Whereas all three tracers showed a similar correlation between the T/N ratio and tumor grade in astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors, MET proved to be the most user-friendly marker in all gliomas as it enables the straightforward localization of 'hot lesions' and provides outstanding quantitative metabolic parameters. Here we highlight a few methodological issues arising from Kato et al.'s study and, consequently, we urge the PET community to reach a consensus on an objective approach towards the evaluation of PET tracers in the field of neuro-oncology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-471
Number of pages2
JournalNature Clinical Practice Neurology
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Jul 16 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'FDG, MET or CHO? The quest for the optimal PET tracer for glioma imaging continues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this