Experiences with the Muon Alignment Systems of the Compact Muon Solenoid Detector

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

After briefly explaining the need for a precise muon chamber alignment, the different muon alignment systems implemented at CMS are described. Due to the tight spatial confinement and challenging large radiation and high magnetic field environment, unique alignment systems had to be developed that handle separately the Barrel and the Endcap regions. A third subsystem, called Link, connects these two together and to the Tracker in a common reference frame. The aligned chamber geometry obtained from the Hardware-based muon alignment is validated by comparisons with photogrammetry information and by studies of residuals of muon tracks extrapolated between chambers. Stability studies, for which the hardware systems are particularly well suited, are also discussed.Alignment methods based on tracks are also described. Muons from cosmic rays and from collisions are used to align the chambers relative to the inner tracker. In addition, beam halo muon tracks traversing overlapping endcap chambers are used for internal endcap alignment. A comparison between the track-based and hardware-based results is given, together with an explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of the different alignment strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-103
Number of pages8
JournalPhysics Procedia
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2012
Event2nd International Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics, TIPP 2011 - Chicago, United States
Duration: Jun 9 2011Jun 14 2011

Fingerprint

solenoids
muons
alignment
detectors
chambers
hardware
photogrammetry
cosmic rays
halos
collisions
radiation
geometry
magnetic fields

Keywords

  • Alignment
  • CERN
  • CMS
  • LHC
  • Muon detector

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Experiences with the Muon Alignment Systems of the Compact Muon Solenoid Detector. / Béni, N.

In: Physics Procedia, Vol. 37, 01.01.2012, p. 96-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{975774979a0a47358f5ac715f1cf2b9c,
title = "Experiences with the Muon Alignment Systems of the Compact Muon Solenoid Detector",
abstract = "After briefly explaining the need for a precise muon chamber alignment, the different muon alignment systems implemented at CMS are described. Due to the tight spatial confinement and challenging large radiation and high magnetic field environment, unique alignment systems had to be developed that handle separately the Barrel and the Endcap regions. A third subsystem, called Link, connects these two together and to the Tracker in a common reference frame. The aligned chamber geometry obtained from the Hardware-based muon alignment is validated by comparisons with photogrammetry information and by studies of residuals of muon tracks extrapolated between chambers. Stability studies, for which the hardware systems are particularly well suited, are also discussed.Alignment methods based on tracks are also described. Muons from cosmic rays and from collisions are used to align the chambers relative to the inner tracker. In addition, beam halo muon tracks traversing overlapping endcap chambers are used for internal endcap alignment. A comparison between the track-based and hardware-based results is given, together with an explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of the different alignment strategies.",
keywords = "Alignment, CERN, CMS, LHC, Muon detector",
author = "N. B{\'e}ni",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.352",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "96--103",
journal = "Physics Procedia",
issn = "1875-3884",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiences with the Muon Alignment Systems of the Compact Muon Solenoid Detector

AU - Béni, N.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - After briefly explaining the need for a precise muon chamber alignment, the different muon alignment systems implemented at CMS are described. Due to the tight spatial confinement and challenging large radiation and high magnetic field environment, unique alignment systems had to be developed that handle separately the Barrel and the Endcap regions. A third subsystem, called Link, connects these two together and to the Tracker in a common reference frame. The aligned chamber geometry obtained from the Hardware-based muon alignment is validated by comparisons with photogrammetry information and by studies of residuals of muon tracks extrapolated between chambers. Stability studies, for which the hardware systems are particularly well suited, are also discussed.Alignment methods based on tracks are also described. Muons from cosmic rays and from collisions are used to align the chambers relative to the inner tracker. In addition, beam halo muon tracks traversing overlapping endcap chambers are used for internal endcap alignment. A comparison between the track-based and hardware-based results is given, together with an explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of the different alignment strategies.

AB - After briefly explaining the need for a precise muon chamber alignment, the different muon alignment systems implemented at CMS are described. Due to the tight spatial confinement and challenging large radiation and high magnetic field environment, unique alignment systems had to be developed that handle separately the Barrel and the Endcap regions. A third subsystem, called Link, connects these two together and to the Tracker in a common reference frame. The aligned chamber geometry obtained from the Hardware-based muon alignment is validated by comparisons with photogrammetry information and by studies of residuals of muon tracks extrapolated between chambers. Stability studies, for which the hardware systems are particularly well suited, are also discussed.Alignment methods based on tracks are also described. Muons from cosmic rays and from collisions are used to align the chambers relative to the inner tracker. In addition, beam halo muon tracks traversing overlapping endcap chambers are used for internal endcap alignment. A comparison between the track-based and hardware-based results is given, together with an explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of the different alignment strategies.

KW - Alignment

KW - CERN

KW - CMS

KW - LHC

KW - Muon detector

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039071641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039071641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.352

DO - 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.352

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85039071641

VL - 37

SP - 96

EP - 103

JO - Physics Procedia

JF - Physics Procedia

SN - 1875-3884

ER -