Exorcising Grice's ghost: An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals

Simon W. Townsend, Sonja E. Koski, Richard W. Byrne, Katie E. Slocombe, Balthasar Bickel, Markus Boeckle, Ines Braga Goncalves, Judith M. Burkart, Tom Flower, Florence Gaunet, Hans Johann Glock, Thibaud Gruber, David A W A M Jansen, Katja Liebal, Angelika Linke, A. Miklósi, Richard Moore, Carel P. van Schaik, Sabine Stoll, Alex VailBridget M. Waller, Markus Wild, Klaus Zuberbühler, Marta B. Manser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Language's intentional nature has been highlighted as a crucial feature distinguishing it from other communication systems. Specifically, language is often thought to depend on highly structured intentional action and mutual mindreading by a communicator and recipient. Whilst similar abilities in animals can shed light on the evolution of intentionality, they remain challenging to detect unambiguously. We revisit animal intentional communication and suggest that progress in identifying analogous capacities has been complicated by (i) the assumption that intentional (that is, voluntary) production of communicative acts requires mental-state attribution, and (ii) variation in approaches investigating communication across sensory modalities. To move forward, we argue that a framework fusing research across modalities and species is required. We structure intentional communication into a series of requirements, each of which can be operationalised, investigated empirically, and must be met for purposive, intentionally communicative acts to be demonstrated. Our unified approach helps elucidate the distribution of animal intentional communication and subsequently serves to clarify what is meant by attributions of intentional communication in animals and humans.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiological Reviews
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Animal Communication
Biocommunications
animal communication
Animals
Communication
Language
Animal Distribution
Aptitude
Communication systems
animals
communications technology
communication (human)
Research

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Gesture
  • Intentionality
  • Language evolution
  • Vocalisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Townsend, S. W., Koski, S. E., Byrne, R. W., Slocombe, K. E., Bickel, B., Boeckle, M., ... Manser, M. B. (Accepted/In press). Exorcising Grice's ghost: An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12289

Exorcising Grice's ghost : An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. / Townsend, Simon W.; Koski, Sonja E.; Byrne, Richard W.; Slocombe, Katie E.; Bickel, Balthasar; Boeckle, Markus; Braga Goncalves, Ines; Burkart, Judith M.; Flower, Tom; Gaunet, Florence; Glock, Hans Johann; Gruber, Thibaud; Jansen, David A W A M; Liebal, Katja; Linke, Angelika; Miklósi, A.; Moore, Richard; van Schaik, Carel P.; Stoll, Sabine; Vail, Alex; Waller, Bridget M.; Wild, Markus; Zuberbühler, Klaus; Manser, Marta B.

In: Biological Reviews, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Townsend, SW, Koski, SE, Byrne, RW, Slocombe, KE, Bickel, B, Boeckle, M, Braga Goncalves, I, Burkart, JM, Flower, T, Gaunet, F, Glock, HJ, Gruber, T, Jansen, DAWAM, Liebal, K, Linke, A, Miklósi, A, Moore, R, van Schaik, CP, Stoll, S, Vail, A, Waller, BM, Wild, M, Zuberbühler, K & Manser, MB 2016, 'Exorcising Grice's ghost: An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals', Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12289
Townsend, Simon W. ; Koski, Sonja E. ; Byrne, Richard W. ; Slocombe, Katie E. ; Bickel, Balthasar ; Boeckle, Markus ; Braga Goncalves, Ines ; Burkart, Judith M. ; Flower, Tom ; Gaunet, Florence ; Glock, Hans Johann ; Gruber, Thibaud ; Jansen, David A W A M ; Liebal, Katja ; Linke, Angelika ; Miklósi, A. ; Moore, Richard ; van Schaik, Carel P. ; Stoll, Sabine ; Vail, Alex ; Waller, Bridget M. ; Wild, Markus ; Zuberbühler, Klaus ; Manser, Marta B. / Exorcising Grice's ghost : An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. In: Biological Reviews. 2016.
@article{ecac558aa09246b4b63fcc3e5676fc7a,
title = "Exorcising Grice's ghost: An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals",
abstract = "Language's intentional nature has been highlighted as a crucial feature distinguishing it from other communication systems. Specifically, language is often thought to depend on highly structured intentional action and mutual mindreading by a communicator and recipient. Whilst similar abilities in animals can shed light on the evolution of intentionality, they remain challenging to detect unambiguously. We revisit animal intentional communication and suggest that progress in identifying analogous capacities has been complicated by (i) the assumption that intentional (that is, voluntary) production of communicative acts requires mental-state attribution, and (ii) variation in approaches investigating communication across sensory modalities. To move forward, we argue that a framework fusing research across modalities and species is required. We structure intentional communication into a series of requirements, each of which can be operationalised, investigated empirically, and must be met for purposive, intentionally communicative acts to be demonstrated. Our unified approach helps elucidate the distribution of animal intentional communication and subsequently serves to clarify what is meant by attributions of intentional communication in animals and humans.",
keywords = "Communication, Gesture, Intentionality, Language evolution, Vocalisation",
author = "Townsend, {Simon W.} and Koski, {Sonja E.} and Byrne, {Richard W.} and Slocombe, {Katie E.} and Balthasar Bickel and Markus Boeckle and {Braga Goncalves}, Ines and Burkart, {Judith M.} and Tom Flower and Florence Gaunet and Glock, {Hans Johann} and Thibaud Gruber and Jansen, {David A W A M} and Katja Liebal and Angelika Linke and A. Mikl{\'o}si and Richard Moore and {van Schaik}, {Carel P.} and Sabine Stoll and Alex Vail and Waller, {Bridget M.} and Markus Wild and Klaus Zuberb{\"u}hler and Manser, {Marta B.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/brv.12289",
language = "English",
journal = "Biological Reviews",
issn = "1464-7931",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exorcising Grice's ghost

T2 - An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals

AU - Townsend, Simon W.

AU - Koski, Sonja E.

AU - Byrne, Richard W.

AU - Slocombe, Katie E.

AU - Bickel, Balthasar

AU - Boeckle, Markus

AU - Braga Goncalves, Ines

AU - Burkart, Judith M.

AU - Flower, Tom

AU - Gaunet, Florence

AU - Glock, Hans Johann

AU - Gruber, Thibaud

AU - Jansen, David A W A M

AU - Liebal, Katja

AU - Linke, Angelika

AU - Miklósi, A.

AU - Moore, Richard

AU - van Schaik, Carel P.

AU - Stoll, Sabine

AU - Vail, Alex

AU - Waller, Bridget M.

AU - Wild, Markus

AU - Zuberbühler, Klaus

AU - Manser, Marta B.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Language's intentional nature has been highlighted as a crucial feature distinguishing it from other communication systems. Specifically, language is often thought to depend on highly structured intentional action and mutual mindreading by a communicator and recipient. Whilst similar abilities in animals can shed light on the evolution of intentionality, they remain challenging to detect unambiguously. We revisit animal intentional communication and suggest that progress in identifying analogous capacities has been complicated by (i) the assumption that intentional (that is, voluntary) production of communicative acts requires mental-state attribution, and (ii) variation in approaches investigating communication across sensory modalities. To move forward, we argue that a framework fusing research across modalities and species is required. We structure intentional communication into a series of requirements, each of which can be operationalised, investigated empirically, and must be met for purposive, intentionally communicative acts to be demonstrated. Our unified approach helps elucidate the distribution of animal intentional communication and subsequently serves to clarify what is meant by attributions of intentional communication in animals and humans.

AB - Language's intentional nature has been highlighted as a crucial feature distinguishing it from other communication systems. Specifically, language is often thought to depend on highly structured intentional action and mutual mindreading by a communicator and recipient. Whilst similar abilities in animals can shed light on the evolution of intentionality, they remain challenging to detect unambiguously. We revisit animal intentional communication and suggest that progress in identifying analogous capacities has been complicated by (i) the assumption that intentional (that is, voluntary) production of communicative acts requires mental-state attribution, and (ii) variation in approaches investigating communication across sensory modalities. To move forward, we argue that a framework fusing research across modalities and species is required. We structure intentional communication into a series of requirements, each of which can be operationalised, investigated empirically, and must be met for purposive, intentionally communicative acts to be demonstrated. Our unified approach helps elucidate the distribution of animal intentional communication and subsequently serves to clarify what is meant by attributions of intentional communication in animals and humans.

KW - Communication

KW - Gesture

KW - Intentionality

KW - Language evolution

KW - Vocalisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994399212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994399212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/brv.12289

DO - 10.1111/brv.12289

M3 - Article

C2 - 27480784

AN - SCOPUS:84994399212

JO - Biological Reviews

JF - Biological Reviews

SN - 1464-7931

ER -