A császármetszések arányának értékelése finanszírozói oldalról

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluation of caesarean section rates from the point of view of the purchaser

I. Boncz, Éva Belicza, Erika Takács

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary established a project for developing a quality indicator system monitoring the quality of health care services. The aim of this issue is to analyze the ratio of caesarean sections in international comparison and also showing the within country inequalities. Data were derived from the financial database (1999-2002) of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), which came from the performance records of the health services providers (mainly hospitals) contracted by the Fund. International data came from the "Health for All" database of the World Health Organization (WHO). The results show that between 1999-2002 the caesarean section rate varied between 21,3-23,6% in Hungary. The caesarean section rate was as follows at various progressivity levels: medical universities 28,4-30,4%, county hospitals 20,3-23,2%, city hospitals of Budapest 22,3-25,1 %, city hospitals other than Budapest 18,5-20,8%. The average incidence ranged from 13-15% to 35-40% at the city hospitals of Budapest. The county hospitals had a range from 13-15% to 35-40% while the city hospitals other than Budapest had a range of 10-12% to 34-37%. We can conclude that the caesarean section rate in Hungary shows similar trends to the international ones. We should underline the great differences within the same progressivity levels. Development of the quality indicator system might strengthen the purchasing role of the National Health Insurance Fund. With introduction of the indicators we can expect that the health care institutions - within a self-assessment process - will review their services and data reporting process thus the great differences might show a reduction.

Original languageHungarian
Pages (from-to)167-171
Number of pages5
JournalMagyar Noorvosok Lapja
Volume68
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Urban Hospitals
Cesarean Section
Hungary
National Health Programs
County Hospitals
Health Services
Databases
Quality of Health Care
Research Design
Delivery of Health Care
Incidence
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

A császármetszések arányának értékelése finanszírozói oldalról. / Boncz, I.; Belicza, Éva; Takács, Erika.

In: Magyar Noorvosok Lapja, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2005, p. 167-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boncz, I. ; Belicza, Éva ; Takács, Erika. / A császármetszések arányának értékelése finanszírozói oldalról. In: Magyar Noorvosok Lapja. 2005 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 167-171.
@article{fc664b42a84e46ba817af5d644fbdada,
title = "A cs{\'a}sz{\'a}rmetsz{\'e}sek ar{\'a}ny{\'a}nak {\'e}rt{\'e}kel{\'e}se finansz{\'i}roz{\'o}i oldalr{\'o}l",
abstract = "The National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary established a project for developing a quality indicator system monitoring the quality of health care services. The aim of this issue is to analyze the ratio of caesarean sections in international comparison and also showing the within country inequalities. Data were derived from the financial database (1999-2002) of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), which came from the performance records of the health services providers (mainly hospitals) contracted by the Fund. International data came from the {"}Health for All{"} database of the World Health Organization (WHO). The results show that between 1999-2002 the caesarean section rate varied between 21,3-23,6{\%} in Hungary. The caesarean section rate was as follows at various progressivity levels: medical universities 28,4-30,4{\%}, county hospitals 20,3-23,2{\%}, city hospitals of Budapest 22,3-25,1 {\%}, city hospitals other than Budapest 18,5-20,8{\%}. The average incidence ranged from 13-15{\%} to 35-40{\%} at the city hospitals of Budapest. The county hospitals had a range from 13-15{\%} to 35-40{\%} while the city hospitals other than Budapest had a range of 10-12{\%} to 34-37{\%}. We can conclude that the caesarean section rate in Hungary shows similar trends to the international ones. We should underline the great differences within the same progressivity levels. Development of the quality indicator system might strengthen the purchasing role of the National Health Insurance Fund. With introduction of the indicators we can expect that the health care institutions - within a self-assessment process - will review their services and data reporting process thus the great differences might show a reduction.",
keywords = "Caesarean section, Diagnosis Related Groups, Financing, Health insurance, Quality indicators",
author = "I. Boncz and {\'E}va Belicza and Erika Tak{\'a}cs",
year = "2005",
language = "Hungarian",
volume = "68",
pages = "167--171",
journal = "Magyar Noorvosok Lapja",
issn = "0025-021X",
publisher = "Magyar Noovos Tarsasag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A császármetszések arányának értékelése finanszírozói oldalról

AU - Boncz, I.

AU - Belicza, Éva

AU - Takács, Erika

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary established a project for developing a quality indicator system monitoring the quality of health care services. The aim of this issue is to analyze the ratio of caesarean sections in international comparison and also showing the within country inequalities. Data were derived from the financial database (1999-2002) of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), which came from the performance records of the health services providers (mainly hospitals) contracted by the Fund. International data came from the "Health for All" database of the World Health Organization (WHO). The results show that between 1999-2002 the caesarean section rate varied between 21,3-23,6% in Hungary. The caesarean section rate was as follows at various progressivity levels: medical universities 28,4-30,4%, county hospitals 20,3-23,2%, city hospitals of Budapest 22,3-25,1 %, city hospitals other than Budapest 18,5-20,8%. The average incidence ranged from 13-15% to 35-40% at the city hospitals of Budapest. The county hospitals had a range from 13-15% to 35-40% while the city hospitals other than Budapest had a range of 10-12% to 34-37%. We can conclude that the caesarean section rate in Hungary shows similar trends to the international ones. We should underline the great differences within the same progressivity levels. Development of the quality indicator system might strengthen the purchasing role of the National Health Insurance Fund. With introduction of the indicators we can expect that the health care institutions - within a self-assessment process - will review their services and data reporting process thus the great differences might show a reduction.

AB - The National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary established a project for developing a quality indicator system monitoring the quality of health care services. The aim of this issue is to analyze the ratio of caesarean sections in international comparison and also showing the within country inequalities. Data were derived from the financial database (1999-2002) of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), which came from the performance records of the health services providers (mainly hospitals) contracted by the Fund. International data came from the "Health for All" database of the World Health Organization (WHO). The results show that between 1999-2002 the caesarean section rate varied between 21,3-23,6% in Hungary. The caesarean section rate was as follows at various progressivity levels: medical universities 28,4-30,4%, county hospitals 20,3-23,2%, city hospitals of Budapest 22,3-25,1 %, city hospitals other than Budapest 18,5-20,8%. The average incidence ranged from 13-15% to 35-40% at the city hospitals of Budapest. The county hospitals had a range from 13-15% to 35-40% while the city hospitals other than Budapest had a range of 10-12% to 34-37%. We can conclude that the caesarean section rate in Hungary shows similar trends to the international ones. We should underline the great differences within the same progressivity levels. Development of the quality indicator system might strengthen the purchasing role of the National Health Insurance Fund. With introduction of the indicators we can expect that the health care institutions - within a self-assessment process - will review their services and data reporting process thus the great differences might show a reduction.

KW - Caesarean section

KW - Diagnosis Related Groups

KW - Financing

KW - Health insurance

KW - Quality indicators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20044396614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20044396614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 167

EP - 171

JO - Magyar Noorvosok Lapja

JF - Magyar Noorvosok Lapja

SN - 0025-021X

IS - 3

ER -