Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions

G. Vastag, Frank Montabon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, there have been scattered attempts at rating the journals, authors and schools involved in operations management. While many of these have been very helpful in generating a relative ranking of productivity and prestige, theses analyses seem incomplete. In this article, we propose to introduce a new facet of rating: impact. We hope impact evaluation of journal, authors and institutions is free of many of the disadvantages of previous methodologies, and informational enough to overcome its own possible weaknesses.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute
Editors Anon
PublisherDecis Sci Inst
Pages1200-1202
Number of pages3
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 1998
EventProceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3) - San Diego, CA, USA
Duration: Nov 22 1997Nov 25 1997

Other

OtherProceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3)
CitySan Diego, CA, USA
Period11/22/9711/25/97

Fingerprint

Productivity
Rating
Prestige
Operations management
Disadvantage
Ranking
Methodology
Impact evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Hardware and Architecture

Cite this

Vastag, G., & Montabon, F. (1998). Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions. In Anon (Ed.), Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute (Vol. 3, pp. 1200-1202). Decis Sci Inst.

Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions. / Vastag, G.; Montabon, Frank.

Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. ed. / Anon. Vol. 3 Decis Sci Inst, 1998. p. 1200-1202.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Vastag, G & Montabon, F 1998, Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions. in Anon (ed.), Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. vol. 3, Decis Sci Inst, pp. 1200-1202, Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3), San Diego, CA, USA, 11/22/97.
Vastag G, Montabon F. Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions. In Anon, editor, Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Vol. 3. Decis Sci Inst. 1998. p. 1200-1202
Vastag, G. ; Montabon, Frank. / Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions. Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. editor / Anon. Vol. 3 Decis Sci Inst, 1998. pp. 1200-1202
@inproceedings{acc65420771e4a769888b068ef57083f,
title = "Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions",
abstract = "Over the past fifteen years, there have been scattered attempts at rating the journals, authors and schools involved in operations management. While many of these have been very helpful in generating a relative ranking of productivity and prestige, theses analyses seem incomplete. In this article, we propose to introduce a new facet of rating: impact. We hope impact evaluation of journal, authors and institutions is free of many of the disadvantages of previous methodologies, and informational enough to overcome its own possible weaknesses.",
author = "G. Vastag and Frank Montabon",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1200--1202",
editor = "Anon",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute",
publisher = "Decis Sci Inst",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluating the research impact of authors, journals and institutions

AU - Vastag, G.

AU - Montabon, Frank

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Over the past fifteen years, there have been scattered attempts at rating the journals, authors and schools involved in operations management. While many of these have been very helpful in generating a relative ranking of productivity and prestige, theses analyses seem incomplete. In this article, we propose to introduce a new facet of rating: impact. We hope impact evaluation of journal, authors and institutions is free of many of the disadvantages of previous methodologies, and informational enough to overcome its own possible weaknesses.

AB - Over the past fifteen years, there have been scattered attempts at rating the journals, authors and schools involved in operations management. While many of these have been very helpful in generating a relative ranking of productivity and prestige, theses analyses seem incomplete. In this article, we propose to introduce a new facet of rating: impact. We hope impact evaluation of journal, authors and institutions is free of many of the disadvantages of previous methodologies, and informational enough to overcome its own possible weaknesses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031617884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031617884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0031617884

VL - 3

SP - 1200

EP - 1202

BT - Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute

A2 - Anon, null

PB - Decis Sci Inst

ER -