Emergent neutrality or hidden niches?

György Barabás, Rafael D'Andrea, Rosalyn Rael, G. Meszéna, Annette Ostling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emergent neutrality is the idea in community ecology that species interactions may drive a system in a direction where some species become so similar that this similarity will be the primary cause for their coexistence instead of niche differentiation. A recent, widely cited model of emergent neutrality is by Scheffer and van Nes, later applied to species abundance distribution patterns by Vergnon et al. We take issue with the ecological interpretation of this model, demonstrating that it in fact presupposes important differences between superficially similar-looking species. We argue that the temptation to interpret the model as one of emergent neutrality stems from the fact that these differences are unmodeled and therefore hidden, obscuring the underlying coexistence mechanisms. We therefore claim that the model is actually one of hidden niches, and present several alternative ways to make its hidden portions more explicit. These alterations to the model also make its proper interpretation as one of hidden niches more transparent. We also polemize with the claim of Vergnon et al. that multimodality in species abundance distributions is support for their emergent neutrality model: we demonstrate that appropriate stochastic versions of classical resource partitioning or even neutral models can lead to such patterns in a robust way. Observation of these patterns is therefore inconclusive as to the underlying mechanisms that generate them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1565-1572
Number of pages8
JournalOikos
Volume122
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

niche
niches
coexistence
biogeography
community ecology
niche partitioning
stems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Barabás, G., D'Andrea, R., Rael, R., Meszéna, G., & Ostling, A. (2013). Emergent neutrality or hidden niches? Oikos, 122(11), 1565-1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x

Emergent neutrality or hidden niches? / Barabás, György; D'Andrea, Rafael; Rael, Rosalyn; Meszéna, G.; Ostling, Annette.

In: Oikos, Vol. 122, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1565-1572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barabás, G, D'Andrea, R, Rael, R, Meszéna, G & Ostling, A 2013, 'Emergent neutrality or hidden niches?', Oikos, vol. 122, no. 11, pp. 1565-1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x
Barabás G, D'Andrea R, Rael R, Meszéna G, Ostling A. Emergent neutrality or hidden niches? Oikos. 2013 Nov;122(11):1565-1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x
Barabás, György ; D'Andrea, Rafael ; Rael, Rosalyn ; Meszéna, G. ; Ostling, Annette. / Emergent neutrality or hidden niches?. In: Oikos. 2013 ; Vol. 122, No. 11. pp. 1565-1572.
@article{7f8f5a721b554e409f2030ad6b225caf,
title = "Emergent neutrality or hidden niches?",
abstract = "Emergent neutrality is the idea in community ecology that species interactions may drive a system in a direction where some species become so similar that this similarity will be the primary cause for their coexistence instead of niche differentiation. A recent, widely cited model of emergent neutrality is by Scheffer and van Nes, later applied to species abundance distribution patterns by Vergnon et al. We take issue with the ecological interpretation of this model, demonstrating that it in fact presupposes important differences between superficially similar-looking species. We argue that the temptation to interpret the model as one of emergent neutrality stems from the fact that these differences are unmodeled and therefore hidden, obscuring the underlying coexistence mechanisms. We therefore claim that the model is actually one of hidden niches, and present several alternative ways to make its hidden portions more explicit. These alterations to the model also make its proper interpretation as one of hidden niches more transparent. We also polemize with the claim of Vergnon et al. that multimodality in species abundance distributions is support for their emergent neutrality model: we demonstrate that appropriate stochastic versions of classical resource partitioning or even neutral models can lead to such patterns in a robust way. Observation of these patterns is therefore inconclusive as to the underlying mechanisms that generate them.",
author = "Gy{\"o}rgy Barab{\'a}s and Rafael D'Andrea and Rosalyn Rael and G. Mesz{\'e}na and Annette Ostling",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "1565--1572",
journal = "Oikos",
issn = "0030-1299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergent neutrality or hidden niches?

AU - Barabás, György

AU - D'Andrea, Rafael

AU - Rael, Rosalyn

AU - Meszéna, G.

AU - Ostling, Annette

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Emergent neutrality is the idea in community ecology that species interactions may drive a system in a direction where some species become so similar that this similarity will be the primary cause for their coexistence instead of niche differentiation. A recent, widely cited model of emergent neutrality is by Scheffer and van Nes, later applied to species abundance distribution patterns by Vergnon et al. We take issue with the ecological interpretation of this model, demonstrating that it in fact presupposes important differences between superficially similar-looking species. We argue that the temptation to interpret the model as one of emergent neutrality stems from the fact that these differences are unmodeled and therefore hidden, obscuring the underlying coexistence mechanisms. We therefore claim that the model is actually one of hidden niches, and present several alternative ways to make its hidden portions more explicit. These alterations to the model also make its proper interpretation as one of hidden niches more transparent. We also polemize with the claim of Vergnon et al. that multimodality in species abundance distributions is support for their emergent neutrality model: we demonstrate that appropriate stochastic versions of classical resource partitioning or even neutral models can lead to such patterns in a robust way. Observation of these patterns is therefore inconclusive as to the underlying mechanisms that generate them.

AB - Emergent neutrality is the idea in community ecology that species interactions may drive a system in a direction where some species become so similar that this similarity will be the primary cause for their coexistence instead of niche differentiation. A recent, widely cited model of emergent neutrality is by Scheffer and van Nes, later applied to species abundance distribution patterns by Vergnon et al. We take issue with the ecological interpretation of this model, demonstrating that it in fact presupposes important differences between superficially similar-looking species. We argue that the temptation to interpret the model as one of emergent neutrality stems from the fact that these differences are unmodeled and therefore hidden, obscuring the underlying coexistence mechanisms. We therefore claim that the model is actually one of hidden niches, and present several alternative ways to make its hidden portions more explicit. These alterations to the model also make its proper interpretation as one of hidden niches more transparent. We also polemize with the claim of Vergnon et al. that multimodality in species abundance distributions is support for their emergent neutrality model: we demonstrate that appropriate stochastic versions of classical resource partitioning or even neutral models can lead to such patterns in a robust way. Observation of these patterns is therefore inconclusive as to the underlying mechanisms that generate them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886285029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886285029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 1565

EP - 1572

JO - Oikos

JF - Oikos

SN - 0030-1299

IS - 11

ER -