Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials

An analysis

Kai M. Rösler, Elisabeth Petrow, Johannes Mathis, Zsuzsanna Arányi, Christian W. Hess, Michel R. Magistris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses. Methods: MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies. Results: MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients. Conclusions: The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1680-1687
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume113
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

Motor Evoked Potentials
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Multiple Sclerosis
Brain
Healthy Volunteers
Isometric Contraction
Motor Neurons
Peripheral Nerves

Keywords

  • Collision technique
  • Corticospinal tract
  • Motor evoked potentials
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Phase cancellation
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials : An analysis. / Rösler, Kai M.; Petrow, Elisabeth; Mathis, Johannes; Arányi, Zsuzsanna; Hess, Christian W.; Magistris, Michel R.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 113, No. 11, 11.2002, p. 1680-1687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rösler, Kai M. ; Petrow, Elisabeth ; Mathis, Johannes ; Arányi, Zsuzsanna ; Hess, Christian W. ; Magistris, Michel R. / Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials : An analysis. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2002 ; Vol. 113, No. 11. pp. 1680-1687.
@article{e9abdbb0e7ea464db1be8d3aa1b87aa5,
title = "Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: An analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses. Methods: MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0{\%} and 20{\%} of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies. Results: MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients. Conclusions: The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.",
keywords = "Collision technique, Corticospinal tract, Motor evoked potentials, Multiple sclerosis, Phase cancellation, Transcranial magnetic stimulation",
author = "R{\"o}sler, {Kai M.} and Elisabeth Petrow and Johannes Mathis and Zsuzsanna Ar{\'a}nyi and Hess, {Christian W.} and Magistris, {Michel R.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00263-8",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "1680--1687",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials

T2 - An analysis

AU - Rösler, Kai M.

AU - Petrow, Elisabeth

AU - Mathis, Johannes

AU - Arányi, Zsuzsanna

AU - Hess, Christian W.

AU - Magistris, Michel R.

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - Objective: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses. Methods: MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies. Results: MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients. Conclusions: The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.

AB - Objective: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses. Methods: MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies. Results: MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients. Conclusions: The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.

KW - Collision technique

KW - Corticospinal tract

KW - Motor evoked potentials

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Phase cancellation

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036848111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036848111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00263-8

DO - 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00263-8

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 1680

EP - 1687

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 11

ER -