Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker on mortality in heart failure patients: Results of a high-volume, single-centre experience

Valentina Kutyifa, Laszlo Geller, Peter Bogyi, Endre Zima, Mehmet K. Aktas, Emin Evren Ozcan, David Becker, Vivien Klaudia Nagy, Annamaria Kosztin, Szabolcs Szilagyi, Bela Merkely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims There are limited and contradictory data on the effects of CRT with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality as compared with CRT with pacemaker (CRT-P).

Methods and results We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients implanted with a CRT-D or CRT-P device in our high-volume single-centre experience. Data on all-cause mortality were derived from clinic visits and the Hungarian National Healthcare Fund Death Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate all-cause mortality in patients with CRT-D vs. CRT-P, stratified by the aetiology of cardiomyopathy. From 2000 to 2011, 1122 CRT devices, 693 CRT-P (LVEF 28.2 ± 7.4%) and 429 CRT-D (LVEF 27.6 ± 6.4%), were implanted at our centre. During the median follow-up of 28 months, 379 patients died from any cause, 250 patients (36%) with an implanted CRT-P and 129 patients (30%) with an implanted CRT-D. There was no evidence of mortality benefit in patients implanted with a CRT-D compared with a CRT-P in the total cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.32, P = 0.884]. In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D treatment was associated with a significant 30% risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with an implanted CRT-P (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97, P = 0.03). In non-ischaemic patients, there was no mortality benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32, P = 0.894, interaction P-value = 0.15).

Conclusions In heart failure patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D was associated with a mortality benefit compared with CRT-P, but no benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P in mortality was observed in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1323-1330
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean journal of heart failure
Volume16
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2014

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Heart failure
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this