Echocardiographic estimates related to various body size measures in athletes

G. Pavlik, Zsuzsanna Olexó, R. Frenkl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In comparing subjects of different body size echocardiographically measured data have usually been related to various body measures, mostly to body surface area (BSA). The present study serves to point out an inherent error of this procedure. Two-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography was performed in 106 elite male athletes. Left ventricular diastolic wall thickness (LVWT), internal diameter (LVID), and estimated left ventricular muscle mass (LVMM), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were related to body height (BH), body weight (BW), fat-free body mass (FFBM) and BSA. The analysis of the 20 indices has revealed that most indices and above all the BSA-related ones suffer from systematic errors so they are unsuitable to compare subjects independently from body size as they significantly correlate with BSA. These errors arise from the fact that the numerator and the denominator of these quotients differ in their power terms. With higher absolute component values all relativized quotients containing a numerator raised to a smaller power than its denominator is bound to decrease (e.g. LVWT/BSA, LVID/BSA) while quotients in which the numerator's exponent exceeds that of the denominator will increase (e.g. LVMM/BSA, CO/BSA, SV/BSA). To avoid such spurious trends it would be wiser to use indices in which power terms match. When relations to BSA are preferred, its square root appears more suitable for linear numerators (wall thickness, diameters), while for volumes and weights the cube of the square root of BSA is suggested. In the general case, however, a dimensional consistence in choosing the relativizing parameter is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalActa Physiologica Hungarica
Volume84
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Body Weights and Measures
Body Surface Area
Body Size
Athletes
Cardiac Output
Stroke Volume
Muscles
Body Height
Echocardiography

Keywords

  • Athletes
  • Echocardiography
  • Method of calculation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Echocardiographic estimates related to various body size measures in athletes. / Pavlik, G.; Olexó, Zsuzsanna; Frenkl, R.

In: Acta Physiologica Hungarica, Vol. 84, No. 2, 1996, p. 171-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pavlik, G. ; Olexó, Zsuzsanna ; Frenkl, R. / Echocardiographic estimates related to various body size measures in athletes. In: Acta Physiologica Hungarica. 1996 ; Vol. 84, No. 2. pp. 171-181.
@article{6ed04ce0af9d4a6a97be031a87648da1,
title = "Echocardiographic estimates related to various body size measures in athletes",
abstract = "In comparing subjects of different body size echocardiographically measured data have usually been related to various body measures, mostly to body surface area (BSA). The present study serves to point out an inherent error of this procedure. Two-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography was performed in 106 elite male athletes. Left ventricular diastolic wall thickness (LVWT), internal diameter (LVID), and estimated left ventricular muscle mass (LVMM), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were related to body height (BH), body weight (BW), fat-free body mass (FFBM) and BSA. The analysis of the 20 indices has revealed that most indices and above all the BSA-related ones suffer from systematic errors so they are unsuitable to compare subjects independently from body size as they significantly correlate with BSA. These errors arise from the fact that the numerator and the denominator of these quotients differ in their power terms. With higher absolute component values all relativized quotients containing a numerator raised to a smaller power than its denominator is bound to decrease (e.g. LVWT/BSA, LVID/BSA) while quotients in which the numerator's exponent exceeds that of the denominator will increase (e.g. LVMM/BSA, CO/BSA, SV/BSA). To avoid such spurious trends it would be wiser to use indices in which power terms match. When relations to BSA are preferred, its square root appears more suitable for linear numerators (wall thickness, diameters), while for volumes and weights the cube of the square root of BSA is suggested. In the general case, however, a dimensional consistence in choosing the relativizing parameter is recommended.",
keywords = "Athletes, Echocardiography, Method of calculation",
author = "G. Pavlik and Zsuzsanna Olex{\'o} and R. Frenkl",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "171--181",
journal = "Physiology International",
issn = "2498-602X",
publisher = "Akademiai Kiado",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Echocardiographic estimates related to various body size measures in athletes

AU - Pavlik, G.

AU - Olexó, Zsuzsanna

AU - Frenkl, R.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - In comparing subjects of different body size echocardiographically measured data have usually been related to various body measures, mostly to body surface area (BSA). The present study serves to point out an inherent error of this procedure. Two-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography was performed in 106 elite male athletes. Left ventricular diastolic wall thickness (LVWT), internal diameter (LVID), and estimated left ventricular muscle mass (LVMM), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were related to body height (BH), body weight (BW), fat-free body mass (FFBM) and BSA. The analysis of the 20 indices has revealed that most indices and above all the BSA-related ones suffer from systematic errors so they are unsuitable to compare subjects independently from body size as they significantly correlate with BSA. These errors arise from the fact that the numerator and the denominator of these quotients differ in their power terms. With higher absolute component values all relativized quotients containing a numerator raised to a smaller power than its denominator is bound to decrease (e.g. LVWT/BSA, LVID/BSA) while quotients in which the numerator's exponent exceeds that of the denominator will increase (e.g. LVMM/BSA, CO/BSA, SV/BSA). To avoid such spurious trends it would be wiser to use indices in which power terms match. When relations to BSA are preferred, its square root appears more suitable for linear numerators (wall thickness, diameters), while for volumes and weights the cube of the square root of BSA is suggested. In the general case, however, a dimensional consistence in choosing the relativizing parameter is recommended.

AB - In comparing subjects of different body size echocardiographically measured data have usually been related to various body measures, mostly to body surface area (BSA). The present study serves to point out an inherent error of this procedure. Two-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography was performed in 106 elite male athletes. Left ventricular diastolic wall thickness (LVWT), internal diameter (LVID), and estimated left ventricular muscle mass (LVMM), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were related to body height (BH), body weight (BW), fat-free body mass (FFBM) and BSA. The analysis of the 20 indices has revealed that most indices and above all the BSA-related ones suffer from systematic errors so they are unsuitable to compare subjects independently from body size as they significantly correlate with BSA. These errors arise from the fact that the numerator and the denominator of these quotients differ in their power terms. With higher absolute component values all relativized quotients containing a numerator raised to a smaller power than its denominator is bound to decrease (e.g. LVWT/BSA, LVID/BSA) while quotients in which the numerator's exponent exceeds that of the denominator will increase (e.g. LVMM/BSA, CO/BSA, SV/BSA). To avoid such spurious trends it would be wiser to use indices in which power terms match. When relations to BSA are preferred, its square root appears more suitable for linear numerators (wall thickness, diameters), while for volumes and weights the cube of the square root of BSA is suggested. In the general case, however, a dimensional consistence in choosing the relativizing parameter is recommended.

KW - Athletes

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Method of calculation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030338408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030338408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9046363

AN - SCOPUS:0030338408

VL - 84

SP - 171

EP - 181

JO - Physiology International

JF - Physiology International

SN - 2498-602X

IS - 2

ER -