Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys

Rolf Ulrich, Harrison G. Pope, Léa Cléret, Andrea Petróczi, T. Nepusz, Jay Schaffer, Gen Kanayama, R. Dawn Comstock, Perikles Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Doping in sports compromises fair play and endangers health. To deter doping among elite athletes, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) oversees testing of several hundred thousand athletic blood and urine samples annually, of which 1–2% test positive. Measures using the Athlete Biological Passport suggest a higher mean prevalence of about 14% positive tests. Biological testing, however, likely fails to detect many cutting-edge doping techniques, and thus the true prevalence of doping remains unknown. Methods: We surveyed 2167 athletes at two sporting events: the 13th International Association of Athletics Federations Word Championships in Athletics (WCA) in Daegu, South Korea in August 2011 and the 12th Quadrennial Pan-Arab Games (PAG) in Doha, Qatar in December 2011. To estimate the prevalence of doping, we utilized a “randomized response technique,” which guarantees anonymity for individuals when answering a sensitive question. We also administered a control question at PAG assessing past-year use of supplements. Results: The estimated prevalence of past-year doping was 43.6% (95% confidence interval 39.4–47.9) at WCA and 57.1% (52.4–61.8) at PAG. The estimated prevalence of past-year supplement use at PAG was 70.1% (65.6–74.7%). Sensitivity analyses, assessing the robustness of these estimates under numerous hypothetical scenarios of intentional or unintentional noncompliance by respondents, suggested that we were unlikely to have overestimated the true prevalence of doping. Conclusions: Doping appears remarkably widespread among elite athletes, and remains largely unchecked despite current biological testing. The survey technique presented here will allow future investigators to generate continued reference estimates of the prevalence of doping.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-219
Number of pages9
JournalSports Medicine
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sports
Athletes
Doping in Sports
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Personnel
Urine
Confidence Intervals
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Ulrich, R., Pope, H. G., Cléret, L., Petróczi, A., Nepusz, T., Schaffer, J., ... Simon, P. (2018). Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys. Sports Medicine, 48(1), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4

Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys. / Ulrich, Rolf; Pope, Harrison G.; Cléret, Léa; Petróczi, Andrea; Nepusz, T.; Schaffer, Jay; Kanayama, Gen; Comstock, R. Dawn; Simon, Perikles.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 211-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ulrich, R, Pope, HG, Cléret, L, Petróczi, A, Nepusz, T, Schaffer, J, Kanayama, G, Comstock, RD & Simon, P 2018, 'Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys', Sports Medicine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4
Ulrich, Rolf ; Pope, Harrison G. ; Cléret, Léa ; Petróczi, Andrea ; Nepusz, T. ; Schaffer, Jay ; Kanayama, Gen ; Comstock, R. Dawn ; Simon, Perikles. / Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys. In: Sports Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 211-219.
@article{b7cac70b285e467da865b1ea4c45f10b,
title = "Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys",
abstract = "Background: Doping in sports compromises fair play and endangers health. To deter doping among elite athletes, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) oversees testing of several hundred thousand athletic blood and urine samples annually, of which 1–2{\%} test positive. Measures using the Athlete Biological Passport suggest a higher mean prevalence of about 14{\%} positive tests. Biological testing, however, likely fails to detect many cutting-edge doping techniques, and thus the true prevalence of doping remains unknown. Methods: We surveyed 2167 athletes at two sporting events: the 13th International Association of Athletics Federations Word Championships in Athletics (WCA) in Daegu, South Korea in August 2011 and the 12th Quadrennial Pan-Arab Games (PAG) in Doha, Qatar in December 2011. To estimate the prevalence of doping, we utilized a “randomized response technique,” which guarantees anonymity for individuals when answering a sensitive question. We also administered a control question at PAG assessing past-year use of supplements. Results: The estimated prevalence of past-year doping was 43.6{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval 39.4–47.9) at WCA and 57.1{\%} (52.4–61.8) at PAG. The estimated prevalence of past-year supplement use at PAG was 70.1{\%} (65.6–74.7{\%}). Sensitivity analyses, assessing the robustness of these estimates under numerous hypothetical scenarios of intentional or unintentional noncompliance by respondents, suggested that we were unlikely to have overestimated the true prevalence of doping. Conclusions: Doping appears remarkably widespread among elite athletes, and remains largely unchecked despite current biological testing. The survey technique presented here will allow future investigators to generate continued reference estimates of the prevalence of doping.",
author = "Rolf Ulrich and Pope, {Harrison G.} and L{\'e}a Cl{\'e}ret and Andrea Petr{\'o}czi and T. Nepusz and Jay Schaffer and Gen Kanayama and Comstock, {R. Dawn} and Perikles Simon",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "211--219",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys

AU - Ulrich, Rolf

AU - Pope, Harrison G.

AU - Cléret, Léa

AU - Petróczi, Andrea

AU - Nepusz, T.

AU - Schaffer, Jay

AU - Kanayama, Gen

AU - Comstock, R. Dawn

AU - Simon, Perikles

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Doping in sports compromises fair play and endangers health. To deter doping among elite athletes, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) oversees testing of several hundred thousand athletic blood and urine samples annually, of which 1–2% test positive. Measures using the Athlete Biological Passport suggest a higher mean prevalence of about 14% positive tests. Biological testing, however, likely fails to detect many cutting-edge doping techniques, and thus the true prevalence of doping remains unknown. Methods: We surveyed 2167 athletes at two sporting events: the 13th International Association of Athletics Federations Word Championships in Athletics (WCA) in Daegu, South Korea in August 2011 and the 12th Quadrennial Pan-Arab Games (PAG) in Doha, Qatar in December 2011. To estimate the prevalence of doping, we utilized a “randomized response technique,” which guarantees anonymity for individuals when answering a sensitive question. We also administered a control question at PAG assessing past-year use of supplements. Results: The estimated prevalence of past-year doping was 43.6% (95% confidence interval 39.4–47.9) at WCA and 57.1% (52.4–61.8) at PAG. The estimated prevalence of past-year supplement use at PAG was 70.1% (65.6–74.7%). Sensitivity analyses, assessing the robustness of these estimates under numerous hypothetical scenarios of intentional or unintentional noncompliance by respondents, suggested that we were unlikely to have overestimated the true prevalence of doping. Conclusions: Doping appears remarkably widespread among elite athletes, and remains largely unchecked despite current biological testing. The survey technique presented here will allow future investigators to generate continued reference estimates of the prevalence of doping.

AB - Background: Doping in sports compromises fair play and endangers health. To deter doping among elite athletes, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) oversees testing of several hundred thousand athletic blood and urine samples annually, of which 1–2% test positive. Measures using the Athlete Biological Passport suggest a higher mean prevalence of about 14% positive tests. Biological testing, however, likely fails to detect many cutting-edge doping techniques, and thus the true prevalence of doping remains unknown. Methods: We surveyed 2167 athletes at two sporting events: the 13th International Association of Athletics Federations Word Championships in Athletics (WCA) in Daegu, South Korea in August 2011 and the 12th Quadrennial Pan-Arab Games (PAG) in Doha, Qatar in December 2011. To estimate the prevalence of doping, we utilized a “randomized response technique,” which guarantees anonymity for individuals when answering a sensitive question. We also administered a control question at PAG assessing past-year use of supplements. Results: The estimated prevalence of past-year doping was 43.6% (95% confidence interval 39.4–47.9) at WCA and 57.1% (52.4–61.8) at PAG. The estimated prevalence of past-year supplement use at PAG was 70.1% (65.6–74.7%). Sensitivity analyses, assessing the robustness of these estimates under numerous hypothetical scenarios of intentional or unintentional noncompliance by respondents, suggested that we were unlikely to have overestimated the true prevalence of doping. Conclusions: Doping appears remarkably widespread among elite athletes, and remains largely unchecked despite current biological testing. The survey technique presented here will allow future investigators to generate continued reference estimates of the prevalence of doping.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028545073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028545073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4

DO - 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 28849386

AN - SCOPUS:85028545073

VL - 48

SP - 211

EP - 219

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 1

ER -