Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of rod-cone coupling in the Xenopus retina

David Krizaj, R. Gábriel, W. Geoffrey Owen, Paul Witkovsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We studied the responses of rod photoreceptors that were elicited with light flashes or sinusoidally modulated light by using intracellular recording. Dark-adapted Xenopus rod photoreceptors responded to sinusoidally modulated green lights at temporal frequencies between 1 Hz and 4 Hz. In normal Ringer's solution, 57% of the rods tested could follow red lights that were matched for equal rod absorbance to frequencies >5 Hz, indicating an input from red-sensitive cones. Quinpirole (10 μM), a D2 dopamine agonist, increased rod-cone coupling, whereas spiperone (5 μM), a selective D2 antagonist, completely suppressed it. D1 dopamine ligands were without effect. Neurobiotin that was injected into single rods diffused into neighboring rods and cones in quinpirole-treated retinas but only diffused into rods in spiperone-treated retinas. A subpopulation of rods (ca. 10% total rods) received a very strong cone input, which quickened the kinetics of their responses to red flashes and greatly increased the bandpass of their responses to sinusoidally modulated light. Based on electron microscopic examination, which showed that rod-rod and cone-cone gap junctions are common, whereas rod-cone junctions are relatively rare, we postulate that cone signals enter the rod network through a minority of rods with strong cone connections, from which the cone signal is further distributed in the rod network. A semiquantitative model of coupling, based on measures of gap- junction size and distribution and estimates of their conductance and open times, provides support for this assumption. The same network would permit rod signals to reach cones.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-538
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Comparative Neurology
Volume398
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 7 1998

Fingerprint

Vertebrate Photoreceptor Cells
Dopamine D2 Receptors
Xenopus
Retina
Quinpirole
Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells
Light
Spiperone
Gap Junctions
Methyl Green
Dopamine Agonists
Dopamine
Electrons
Ligands

Keywords

  • Gap junction
  • Neuromodulation
  • Photoreceptor
  • Retina

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of rod-cone coupling in the Xenopus retina. / Krizaj, David; Gábriel, R.; Owen, W. Geoffrey; Witkovsky, Paul.

In: Journal of Comparative Neurology, Vol. 398, No. 4, 07.09.1998, p. 529-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krizaj, David ; Gábriel, R. ; Owen, W. Geoffrey ; Witkovsky, Paul. / Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of rod-cone coupling in the Xenopus retina. In: Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1998 ; Vol. 398, No. 4. pp. 529-538.
@article{0229a31d01274d3ba4b629e4d2335c3a,
title = "Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of rod-cone coupling in the Xenopus retina",
abstract = "We studied the responses of rod photoreceptors that were elicited with light flashes or sinusoidally modulated light by using intracellular recording. Dark-adapted Xenopus rod photoreceptors responded to sinusoidally modulated green lights at temporal frequencies between 1 Hz and 4 Hz. In normal Ringer's solution, 57{\%} of the rods tested could follow red lights that were matched for equal rod absorbance to frequencies >5 Hz, indicating an input from red-sensitive cones. Quinpirole (10 μM), a D2 dopamine agonist, increased rod-cone coupling, whereas spiperone (5 μM), a selective D2 antagonist, completely suppressed it. D1 dopamine ligands were without effect. Neurobiotin that was injected into single rods diffused into neighboring rods and cones in quinpirole-treated retinas but only diffused into rods in spiperone-treated retinas. A subpopulation of rods (ca. 10{\%} total rods) received a very strong cone input, which quickened the kinetics of their responses to red flashes and greatly increased the bandpass of their responses to sinusoidally modulated light. Based on electron microscopic examination, which showed that rod-rod and cone-cone gap junctions are common, whereas rod-cone junctions are relatively rare, we postulate that cone signals enter the rod network through a minority of rods with strong cone connections, from which the cone signal is further distributed in the rod network. A semiquantitative model of coupling, based on measures of gap- junction size and distribution and estimates of their conductance and open times, provides support for this assumption. The same network would permit rod signals to reach cones.",
keywords = "Gap junction, Neuromodulation, Photoreceptor, Retina",
author = "David Krizaj and R. G{\'a}briel and Owen, {W. Geoffrey} and Paul Witkovsky",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980907)398:4<529::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-4",
language = "English",
volume = "398",
pages = "529--538",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Neurology",
issn = "0021-9967",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of rod-cone coupling in the Xenopus retina

AU - Krizaj, David

AU - Gábriel, R.

AU - Owen, W. Geoffrey

AU - Witkovsky, Paul

PY - 1998/9/7

Y1 - 1998/9/7

N2 - We studied the responses of rod photoreceptors that were elicited with light flashes or sinusoidally modulated light by using intracellular recording. Dark-adapted Xenopus rod photoreceptors responded to sinusoidally modulated green lights at temporal frequencies between 1 Hz and 4 Hz. In normal Ringer's solution, 57% of the rods tested could follow red lights that were matched for equal rod absorbance to frequencies >5 Hz, indicating an input from red-sensitive cones. Quinpirole (10 μM), a D2 dopamine agonist, increased rod-cone coupling, whereas spiperone (5 μM), a selective D2 antagonist, completely suppressed it. D1 dopamine ligands were without effect. Neurobiotin that was injected into single rods diffused into neighboring rods and cones in quinpirole-treated retinas but only diffused into rods in spiperone-treated retinas. A subpopulation of rods (ca. 10% total rods) received a very strong cone input, which quickened the kinetics of their responses to red flashes and greatly increased the bandpass of their responses to sinusoidally modulated light. Based on electron microscopic examination, which showed that rod-rod and cone-cone gap junctions are common, whereas rod-cone junctions are relatively rare, we postulate that cone signals enter the rod network through a minority of rods with strong cone connections, from which the cone signal is further distributed in the rod network. A semiquantitative model of coupling, based on measures of gap- junction size and distribution and estimates of their conductance and open times, provides support for this assumption. The same network would permit rod signals to reach cones.

AB - We studied the responses of rod photoreceptors that were elicited with light flashes or sinusoidally modulated light by using intracellular recording. Dark-adapted Xenopus rod photoreceptors responded to sinusoidally modulated green lights at temporal frequencies between 1 Hz and 4 Hz. In normal Ringer's solution, 57% of the rods tested could follow red lights that were matched for equal rod absorbance to frequencies >5 Hz, indicating an input from red-sensitive cones. Quinpirole (10 μM), a D2 dopamine agonist, increased rod-cone coupling, whereas spiperone (5 μM), a selective D2 antagonist, completely suppressed it. D1 dopamine ligands were without effect. Neurobiotin that was injected into single rods diffused into neighboring rods and cones in quinpirole-treated retinas but only diffused into rods in spiperone-treated retinas. A subpopulation of rods (ca. 10% total rods) received a very strong cone input, which quickened the kinetics of their responses to red flashes and greatly increased the bandpass of their responses to sinusoidally modulated light. Based on electron microscopic examination, which showed that rod-rod and cone-cone gap junctions are common, whereas rod-cone junctions are relatively rare, we postulate that cone signals enter the rod network through a minority of rods with strong cone connections, from which the cone signal is further distributed in the rod network. A semiquantitative model of coupling, based on measures of gap- junction size and distribution and estimates of their conductance and open times, provides support for this assumption. The same network would permit rod signals to reach cones.

KW - Gap junction

KW - Neuromodulation

KW - Photoreceptor

KW - Retina

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032494279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032494279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980907)398:4<529::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-4

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980907)398:4<529::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-4

M3 - Article

VL - 398

SP - 529

EP - 538

JO - Journal of Comparative Neurology

JF - Journal of Comparative Neurology

SN - 0021-9967

IS - 4

ER -