Diastolic function in Olympic athletes versus controls: Stiffness-based and relaxation-based echocardiographic comparisons

Astrid Apor, B. Merkely, Thomas Morrell, Simeng Zhu, Erina Ghosh, Hajnalka Vágó, Péter Andrássy, Sándor J. Kovács

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Physiologic hypertrophy of the athlete heart, compared to the heart of nonathletic controls, is characterized by an increase in the left ventricular (LV) chamber dimension, mass, and wall thickness. Comparisons of the diastolic function (DF) between athletes and controls have employed conventional echocardiographic transmitral flow (Doppler E-wave)-derived indexes such as the peak flow velocity and deceleration time (which are load-dependent) and obscure the mechanistic determinants (e.g., stiffness, relaxation, load) of E-wave. With a focus on stiffness and relaxation chamber properties, conventional kinematic model-derived and load-independent indexes of the DF were compared between athletes and controls in this study. Echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 22 master athletes (whose sport was canoeing) and 21 sedentary controls were analyzed (1290 Doppler E-waves; 702 from athletes and 588 from the controls; on average, there were 30 pieces of data per subject). The LV mass and chamber size were determined from the MRI data. Quantitative DF assessment utilized an established kinematic model of filling that used the digitized Doppler E-wave contour as the input and characterized the DF on the basis of the chamber stiffness (k), relaxation/viscoelasticity (c), load (xo). We observed significant chamber stiffness (k), load (xo), and E-wave duration differences between the two groups. Concordant with the findings of previous studies, we also noted significant group differences in LV mass and dimension. These results indicated that physiological LV remodeling of the athlete heart at rest generates numerically quantifiable alterations in specific chamber properties. Assessment of the DF by using these methods during exercise will further elucidate the dynamic interplay between relaxation and stiffness as DF determinants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-34
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Exercise Science and Fitness
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Athletes
Biomechanical Phenomena
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ventricular Remodeling
Deceleration
Cardiomegaly
Sports
Exercise

Keywords

  • Diastolic function
  • Echocardiography
  • Physiologic hypertrophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (nursing)
  • Pharmaceutical Science

Cite this

Diastolic function in Olympic athletes versus controls : Stiffness-based and relaxation-based echocardiographic comparisons. / Apor, Astrid; Merkely, B.; Morrell, Thomas; Zhu, Simeng; Ghosh, Erina; Vágó, Hajnalka; Andrássy, Péter; Kovács, Sándor J.

In: Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, Vol. 11, No. 1, 06.2013, p. 29-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Apor, Astrid ; Merkely, B. ; Morrell, Thomas ; Zhu, Simeng ; Ghosh, Erina ; Vágó, Hajnalka ; Andrássy, Péter ; Kovács, Sándor J. / Diastolic function in Olympic athletes versus controls : Stiffness-based and relaxation-based echocardiographic comparisons. In: Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness. 2013 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 29-34.
@article{9b510ebb927b4d898c7e30bfae720204,
title = "Diastolic function in Olympic athletes versus controls: Stiffness-based and relaxation-based echocardiographic comparisons",
abstract = "Physiologic hypertrophy of the athlete heart, compared to the heart of nonathletic controls, is characterized by an increase in the left ventricular (LV) chamber dimension, mass, and wall thickness. Comparisons of the diastolic function (DF) between athletes and controls have employed conventional echocardiographic transmitral flow (Doppler E-wave)-derived indexes such as the peak flow velocity and deceleration time (which are load-dependent) and obscure the mechanistic determinants (e.g., stiffness, relaxation, load) of E-wave. With a focus on stiffness and relaxation chamber properties, conventional kinematic model-derived and load-independent indexes of the DF were compared between athletes and controls in this study. Echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 22 master athletes (whose sport was canoeing) and 21 sedentary controls were analyzed (1290 Doppler E-waves; 702 from athletes and 588 from the controls; on average, there were 30 pieces of data per subject). The LV mass and chamber size were determined from the MRI data. Quantitative DF assessment utilized an established kinematic model of filling that used the digitized Doppler E-wave contour as the input and characterized the DF on the basis of the chamber stiffness (k), relaxation/viscoelasticity (c), load (xo). We observed significant chamber stiffness (k), load (xo), and E-wave duration differences between the two groups. Concordant with the findings of previous studies, we also noted significant group differences in LV mass and dimension. These results indicated that physiological LV remodeling of the athlete heart at rest generates numerically quantifiable alterations in specific chamber properties. Assessment of the DF by using these methods during exercise will further elucidate the dynamic interplay between relaxation and stiffness as DF determinants.",
keywords = "Diastolic function, Echocardiography, Physiologic hypertrophy",
author = "Astrid Apor and B. Merkely and Thomas Morrell and Simeng Zhu and Erina Ghosh and Hajnalka V{\'a}g{\'o} and P{\'e}ter Andr{\'a}ssy and Kov{\'a}cs, {S{\'a}ndor J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesf.2013.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "29--34",
journal = "Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness",
issn = "1728-869X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diastolic function in Olympic athletes versus controls

T2 - Stiffness-based and relaxation-based echocardiographic comparisons

AU - Apor, Astrid

AU - Merkely, B.

AU - Morrell, Thomas

AU - Zhu, Simeng

AU - Ghosh, Erina

AU - Vágó, Hajnalka

AU - Andrássy, Péter

AU - Kovács, Sándor J.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Physiologic hypertrophy of the athlete heart, compared to the heart of nonathletic controls, is characterized by an increase in the left ventricular (LV) chamber dimension, mass, and wall thickness. Comparisons of the diastolic function (DF) between athletes and controls have employed conventional echocardiographic transmitral flow (Doppler E-wave)-derived indexes such as the peak flow velocity and deceleration time (which are load-dependent) and obscure the mechanistic determinants (e.g., stiffness, relaxation, load) of E-wave. With a focus on stiffness and relaxation chamber properties, conventional kinematic model-derived and load-independent indexes of the DF were compared between athletes and controls in this study. Echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 22 master athletes (whose sport was canoeing) and 21 sedentary controls were analyzed (1290 Doppler E-waves; 702 from athletes and 588 from the controls; on average, there were 30 pieces of data per subject). The LV mass and chamber size were determined from the MRI data. Quantitative DF assessment utilized an established kinematic model of filling that used the digitized Doppler E-wave contour as the input and characterized the DF on the basis of the chamber stiffness (k), relaxation/viscoelasticity (c), load (xo). We observed significant chamber stiffness (k), load (xo), and E-wave duration differences between the two groups. Concordant with the findings of previous studies, we also noted significant group differences in LV mass and dimension. These results indicated that physiological LV remodeling of the athlete heart at rest generates numerically quantifiable alterations in specific chamber properties. Assessment of the DF by using these methods during exercise will further elucidate the dynamic interplay between relaxation and stiffness as DF determinants.

AB - Physiologic hypertrophy of the athlete heart, compared to the heart of nonathletic controls, is characterized by an increase in the left ventricular (LV) chamber dimension, mass, and wall thickness. Comparisons of the diastolic function (DF) between athletes and controls have employed conventional echocardiographic transmitral flow (Doppler E-wave)-derived indexes such as the peak flow velocity and deceleration time (which are load-dependent) and obscure the mechanistic determinants (e.g., stiffness, relaxation, load) of E-wave. With a focus on stiffness and relaxation chamber properties, conventional kinematic model-derived and load-independent indexes of the DF were compared between athletes and controls in this study. Echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 22 master athletes (whose sport was canoeing) and 21 sedentary controls were analyzed (1290 Doppler E-waves; 702 from athletes and 588 from the controls; on average, there were 30 pieces of data per subject). The LV mass and chamber size were determined from the MRI data. Quantitative DF assessment utilized an established kinematic model of filling that used the digitized Doppler E-wave contour as the input and characterized the DF on the basis of the chamber stiffness (k), relaxation/viscoelasticity (c), load (xo). We observed significant chamber stiffness (k), load (xo), and E-wave duration differences between the two groups. Concordant with the findings of previous studies, we also noted significant group differences in LV mass and dimension. These results indicated that physiological LV remodeling of the athlete heart at rest generates numerically quantifiable alterations in specific chamber properties. Assessment of the DF by using these methods during exercise will further elucidate the dynamic interplay between relaxation and stiffness as DF determinants.

KW - Diastolic function

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Physiologic hypertrophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879554146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879554146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesf.2013.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jesf.2013.04.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84879554146

VL - 11

SP - 29

EP - 34

JO - Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness

JF - Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness

SN - 1728-869X

IS - 1

ER -