Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions

Dirk S. Schmeller, Bernd Gruber, Bianca Bauch, Kaire Lanno, Eduardas Budrys, Valerija Babij, Rimvydas Juškaitis, Marek Sammul, Z. Varga, Klaus Henle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) commits its signatories to the identification and monitoring of biodiversity. The European Union has implemented this commitment into its legislation. Despite the legal requirement resources are scarce, requiring a prioritization of conservation actions, including e.g. monitoring. Red lists are currently the most prominent tool for priority setting in applied conservation, despite the fact that they were not developed for that purpose. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that they do not always reflect actual conservation needs. As a response, the concept of national responsibility as a complementary tool was developed during the last two decades. The existing methods are country specific and mainly incomparable on an international scale. Here, we present a newly developed method, which is applicable to any taxonomic group, adjustable to different geographic scales, with little data requirements and clear categorizations. We apply the new method to over 1,000 species in several countries of different size and report on the applicability of our method and discuss problems that derive from the currently available data. Our method has several major advantages compared to currently available methods. It is applicable to any geographic range, allows automatization, given database availability, and is readily adjustable to future data improvements. It further has comparably low data demands by exploiting one of the most commonly available information on biodiversity, i.e. distribution maps. We believe that our method allows the allocation of the limited resources in nature conservation in the most sensible way, e.g. the sharing of monitoring duties, effectively selecting networks of protected areas, improving knowledge on biodiversity, and closing information gaps in many species groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3607-3622
Number of pages16
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume17
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

species conservation
biodiversity
methodology
monitoring
prioritization
Red List
resource
natural resources conservation
jurisdiction
method
responsibility
nature conservation
European Union
laws and regulations
protected area
legislation
conservation areas

Keywords

  • Distribution range
  • Europe
  • Evaluation methods
  • International importance
  • National responsibility
  • Species conservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. / Schmeller, Dirk S.; Gruber, Bernd; Bauch, Bianca; Lanno, Kaire; Budrys, Eduardas; Babij, Valerija; Juškaitis, Rimvydas; Sammul, Marek; Varga, Z.; Henle, Klaus.

In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 17, No. 14, 12.2008, p. 3607-3622.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmeller, DS, Gruber, B, Bauch, B, Lanno, K, Budrys, E, Babij, V, Juškaitis, R, Sammul, M, Varga, Z & Henle, K 2008, 'Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions', Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 3607-3622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9439-8
Schmeller, Dirk S. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Bauch, Bianca ; Lanno, Kaire ; Budrys, Eduardas ; Babij, Valerija ; Juškaitis, Rimvydas ; Sammul, Marek ; Varga, Z. ; Henle, Klaus. / Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. In: Biodiversity and Conservation. 2008 ; Vol. 17, No. 14. pp. 3607-3622.
@article{debf5b18303c4f30bc9421749d3a101e,
title = "Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions",
abstract = "The Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) commits its signatories to the identification and monitoring of biodiversity. The European Union has implemented this commitment into its legislation. Despite the legal requirement resources are scarce, requiring a prioritization of conservation actions, including e.g. monitoring. Red lists are currently the most prominent tool for priority setting in applied conservation, despite the fact that they were not developed for that purpose. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that they do not always reflect actual conservation needs. As a response, the concept of national responsibility as a complementary tool was developed during the last two decades. The existing methods are country specific and mainly incomparable on an international scale. Here, we present a newly developed method, which is applicable to any taxonomic group, adjustable to different geographic scales, with little data requirements and clear categorizations. We apply the new method to over 1,000 species in several countries of different size and report on the applicability of our method and discuss problems that derive from the currently available data. Our method has several major advantages compared to currently available methods. It is applicable to any geographic range, allows automatization, given database availability, and is readily adjustable to future data improvements. It further has comparably low data demands by exploiting one of the most commonly available information on biodiversity, i.e. distribution maps. We believe that our method allows the allocation of the limited resources in nature conservation in the most sensible way, e.g. the sharing of monitoring duties, effectively selecting networks of protected areas, improving knowledge on biodiversity, and closing information gaps in many species groups.",
keywords = "Distribution range, Europe, Evaluation methods, International importance, National responsibility, Species conservation",
author = "Schmeller, {Dirk S.} and Bernd Gruber and Bianca Bauch and Kaire Lanno and Eduardas Budrys and Valerija Babij and Rimvydas Juškaitis and Marek Sammul and Z. Varga and Klaus Henle",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-008-9439-8",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "3607--3622",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions

AU - Schmeller, Dirk S.

AU - Gruber, Bernd

AU - Bauch, Bianca

AU - Lanno, Kaire

AU - Budrys, Eduardas

AU - Babij, Valerija

AU - Juškaitis, Rimvydas

AU - Sammul, Marek

AU - Varga, Z.

AU - Henle, Klaus

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - The Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) commits its signatories to the identification and monitoring of biodiversity. The European Union has implemented this commitment into its legislation. Despite the legal requirement resources are scarce, requiring a prioritization of conservation actions, including e.g. monitoring. Red lists are currently the most prominent tool for priority setting in applied conservation, despite the fact that they were not developed for that purpose. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that they do not always reflect actual conservation needs. As a response, the concept of national responsibility as a complementary tool was developed during the last two decades. The existing methods are country specific and mainly incomparable on an international scale. Here, we present a newly developed method, which is applicable to any taxonomic group, adjustable to different geographic scales, with little data requirements and clear categorizations. We apply the new method to over 1,000 species in several countries of different size and report on the applicability of our method and discuss problems that derive from the currently available data. Our method has several major advantages compared to currently available methods. It is applicable to any geographic range, allows automatization, given database availability, and is readily adjustable to future data improvements. It further has comparably low data demands by exploiting one of the most commonly available information on biodiversity, i.e. distribution maps. We believe that our method allows the allocation of the limited resources in nature conservation in the most sensible way, e.g. the sharing of monitoring duties, effectively selecting networks of protected areas, improving knowledge on biodiversity, and closing information gaps in many species groups.

AB - The Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) commits its signatories to the identification and monitoring of biodiversity. The European Union has implemented this commitment into its legislation. Despite the legal requirement resources are scarce, requiring a prioritization of conservation actions, including e.g. monitoring. Red lists are currently the most prominent tool for priority setting in applied conservation, despite the fact that they were not developed for that purpose. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that they do not always reflect actual conservation needs. As a response, the concept of national responsibility as a complementary tool was developed during the last two decades. The existing methods are country specific and mainly incomparable on an international scale. Here, we present a newly developed method, which is applicable to any taxonomic group, adjustable to different geographic scales, with little data requirements and clear categorizations. We apply the new method to over 1,000 species in several countries of different size and report on the applicability of our method and discuss problems that derive from the currently available data. Our method has several major advantages compared to currently available methods. It is applicable to any geographic range, allows automatization, given database availability, and is readily adjustable to future data improvements. It further has comparably low data demands by exploiting one of the most commonly available information on biodiversity, i.e. distribution maps. We believe that our method allows the allocation of the limited resources in nature conservation in the most sensible way, e.g. the sharing of monitoring duties, effectively selecting networks of protected areas, improving knowledge on biodiversity, and closing information gaps in many species groups.

KW - Distribution range

KW - Europe

KW - Evaluation methods

KW - International importance

KW - National responsibility

KW - Species conservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56549104918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56549104918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-008-9439-8

DO - 10.1007/s10531-008-9439-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:56549104918

VL - 17

SP - 3607

EP - 3622

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 14

ER -