Current-independent paleomagnetic declinations in flysch basins

A case study from the inner carpathians

E. Márton, Maria Jeleńska, Antek K. Tokarski, Ján Soták, Michal Kováč, Ján Spišiak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Paleomagnetic declinations from the Inner Carpathian Paleogene Basin imply that the area rotated counterclockwise about 60°, during the Miocene[1]. The question may arise if the paleomagnetic declination could have been biased by the W-E directed turbidity currents prevailing in the basin causing an apparent counter-clockwise rotation of the paleomagnetic direction. The paleomagnetic results were obtained for fine grained strata, deposited in relatively calm water. Nevertheless, to confirm the paleomagnetic rotation, we needed evidence that flow activity on the magnetic grains was indeed insignificant in the beds yielding paleomagnetic results. Therefore, we carried out magnetic anisotropy measurements. Results of AMS (representing para and ferromagnetic minerals together) measurements, compared with paleomagnetic observations, demonstrate that well-clustered lineations at locality level and failure to define a paleomagnetic direction are coupled. Lineation, when observable, is flow parallel, suggesting that magnetic lineation in the Inner Carpathian flysch basins may be regarded as a good proxy for turbidity current direction. It is remarkable, however, that the well-defined paleomagnetic directions are observed for localities, where the magnetic fabric is not showing lineation on locality level. Moreover, the lineation direction of the ferromagnetic minerals alone (obtained by measuring the anisotropy of the remanence) is independent of that of the turbidity currents. Thus we can safely conclude that the Inner Carpathian flysch basin indeed was affected by 60° tectonic rotation, and the paleomagnetic vectors were not biased by paleocurrents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-82
Number of pages10
JournalGeodinamica Acta
Volume22
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

declination
flysch
lineation
turbidity
turbidity current
basin
minerals
counter rotation
tectonic rotation
current direction
magnetic fabric
paleocurrent
parallel flow
anisotropy
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer
magnetic anisotropy
accelerator mass spectrometry
mineral
strata
remanence

Keywords

  • Flysch
  • Magnetic anisotropy
  • Paleomagnetic declination
  • Possible bias
  • Turbidity current

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Geophysics

Cite this

Current-independent paleomagnetic declinations in flysch basins : A case study from the inner carpathians. / Márton, E.; Jeleńska, Maria; Tokarski, Antek K.; Soták, Ján; Kováč, Michal; Spišiak, Ján.

In: Geodinamica Acta, Vol. 22, No. 1-3, 01.2009, p. 73-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Márton, E. ; Jeleńska, Maria ; Tokarski, Antek K. ; Soták, Ján ; Kováč, Michal ; Spišiak, Ján. / Current-independent paleomagnetic declinations in flysch basins : A case study from the inner carpathians. In: Geodinamica Acta. 2009 ; Vol. 22, No. 1-3. pp. 73-82.
@article{1836d35f2a1a4effafa6cdb891e74e2b,
title = "Current-independent paleomagnetic declinations in flysch basins: A case study from the inner carpathians",
abstract = "Paleomagnetic declinations from the Inner Carpathian Paleogene Basin imply that the area rotated counterclockwise about 60°, during the Miocene[1]. The question may arise if the paleomagnetic declination could have been biased by the W-E directed turbidity currents prevailing in the basin causing an apparent counter-clockwise rotation of the paleomagnetic direction. The paleomagnetic results were obtained for fine grained strata, deposited in relatively calm water. Nevertheless, to confirm the paleomagnetic rotation, we needed evidence that flow activity on the magnetic grains was indeed insignificant in the beds yielding paleomagnetic results. Therefore, we carried out magnetic anisotropy measurements. Results of AMS (representing para and ferromagnetic minerals together) measurements, compared with paleomagnetic observations, demonstrate that well-clustered lineations at locality level and failure to define a paleomagnetic direction are coupled. Lineation, when observable, is flow parallel, suggesting that magnetic lineation in the Inner Carpathian flysch basins may be regarded as a good proxy for turbidity current direction. It is remarkable, however, that the well-defined paleomagnetic directions are observed for localities, where the magnetic fabric is not showing lineation on locality level. Moreover, the lineation direction of the ferromagnetic minerals alone (obtained by measuring the anisotropy of the remanence) is independent of that of the turbidity currents. Thus we can safely conclude that the Inner Carpathian flysch basin indeed was affected by 60° tectonic rotation, and the paleomagnetic vectors were not biased by paleocurrents.",
keywords = "Flysch, Magnetic anisotropy, Paleomagnetic declination, Possible bias, Turbidity current",
author = "E. M{\'a}rton and Maria Jeleńska and Tokarski, {Antek K.} and J{\'a}n Sot{\'a}k and Michal Kov{\'a}č and J{\'a}n Spišiak",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3166/ga.22.73-82",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "73--82",
journal = "Geodinamica Acta",
issn = "0985-3111",
publisher = "Lavoisier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current-independent paleomagnetic declinations in flysch basins

T2 - A case study from the inner carpathians

AU - Márton, E.

AU - Jeleńska, Maria

AU - Tokarski, Antek K.

AU - Soták, Ján

AU - Kováč, Michal

AU - Spišiak, Ján

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Paleomagnetic declinations from the Inner Carpathian Paleogene Basin imply that the area rotated counterclockwise about 60°, during the Miocene[1]. The question may arise if the paleomagnetic declination could have been biased by the W-E directed turbidity currents prevailing in the basin causing an apparent counter-clockwise rotation of the paleomagnetic direction. The paleomagnetic results were obtained for fine grained strata, deposited in relatively calm water. Nevertheless, to confirm the paleomagnetic rotation, we needed evidence that flow activity on the magnetic grains was indeed insignificant in the beds yielding paleomagnetic results. Therefore, we carried out magnetic anisotropy measurements. Results of AMS (representing para and ferromagnetic minerals together) measurements, compared with paleomagnetic observations, demonstrate that well-clustered lineations at locality level and failure to define a paleomagnetic direction are coupled. Lineation, when observable, is flow parallel, suggesting that magnetic lineation in the Inner Carpathian flysch basins may be regarded as a good proxy for turbidity current direction. It is remarkable, however, that the well-defined paleomagnetic directions are observed for localities, where the magnetic fabric is not showing lineation on locality level. Moreover, the lineation direction of the ferromagnetic minerals alone (obtained by measuring the anisotropy of the remanence) is independent of that of the turbidity currents. Thus we can safely conclude that the Inner Carpathian flysch basin indeed was affected by 60° tectonic rotation, and the paleomagnetic vectors were not biased by paleocurrents.

AB - Paleomagnetic declinations from the Inner Carpathian Paleogene Basin imply that the area rotated counterclockwise about 60°, during the Miocene[1]. The question may arise if the paleomagnetic declination could have been biased by the W-E directed turbidity currents prevailing in the basin causing an apparent counter-clockwise rotation of the paleomagnetic direction. The paleomagnetic results were obtained for fine grained strata, deposited in relatively calm water. Nevertheless, to confirm the paleomagnetic rotation, we needed evidence that flow activity on the magnetic grains was indeed insignificant in the beds yielding paleomagnetic results. Therefore, we carried out magnetic anisotropy measurements. Results of AMS (representing para and ferromagnetic minerals together) measurements, compared with paleomagnetic observations, demonstrate that well-clustered lineations at locality level and failure to define a paleomagnetic direction are coupled. Lineation, when observable, is flow parallel, suggesting that magnetic lineation in the Inner Carpathian flysch basins may be regarded as a good proxy for turbidity current direction. It is remarkable, however, that the well-defined paleomagnetic directions are observed for localities, where the magnetic fabric is not showing lineation on locality level. Moreover, the lineation direction of the ferromagnetic minerals alone (obtained by measuring the anisotropy of the remanence) is independent of that of the turbidity currents. Thus we can safely conclude that the Inner Carpathian flysch basin indeed was affected by 60° tectonic rotation, and the paleomagnetic vectors were not biased by paleocurrents.

KW - Flysch

KW - Magnetic anisotropy

KW - Paleomagnetic declination

KW - Possible bias

KW - Turbidity current

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73949096289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73949096289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3166/ga.22.73-82

DO - 10.3166/ga.22.73-82

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 73

EP - 82

JO - Geodinamica Acta

JF - Geodinamica Acta

SN - 0985-3111

IS - 1-3

ER -