Cross-cultural confirmation of bi-factor models of a symptom distress measure: Symptom Checklist-90-Revised in clinical samples

R. Urbán, Willem A. Arrindell, Z. Demetrovics, Zsolt Unoka, Reinier Timman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four decades have elapsed since the introduction for clinical and research purposes of the Symptom Checklist-90(-R). Yet, its underlying dimensional structure has not been clearly delineated. A shift has been observed in the methods utilized-from predominantly exploratory factor analytic in nature in the first two decades or so to different confirmatory methods in recent years. A need remains to search for a structure that remains invariant across samples and nations. In that context, the present study attempted to replicate and extend recent findings yielded in a Hungarian general population sample (N = 2,874) with two psychiatric patient samples from Hungary (N = 972) and The Netherlands (N = 1,902). In doing so, four models were contrasted: the one-factor model, Derogatis' nine factor model, a second-ordered factor model, and a bi-factor model. The bi-factor model was shown to yield the closest fit to the data in both countries. Further studies are needed to determine the stable number and kind of subscale scores that reflect the specific (primary) symptoms best, that is, those subscales with minimal shared variance with the overall general psychological distress dimension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-274
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume239
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 30 2016

Fingerprint

Checklist
Hungary
Netherlands
Psychiatry
Psychology
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Bi-factor model
  • Clinical sample
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis
  • Cross-cultural
  • Omega hierarchical
  • Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Cross-cultural confirmation of bi-factor models of a symptom distress measure : Symptom Checklist-90-Revised in clinical samples. / Urbán, R.; Arrindell, Willem A.; Demetrovics, Z.; Unoka, Zsolt; Timman, Reinier.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 239, 30.05.2016, p. 265-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ffb327d9f4ee438693188575f618249a,
title = "Cross-cultural confirmation of bi-factor models of a symptom distress measure: Symptom Checklist-90-Revised in clinical samples",
abstract = "Four decades have elapsed since the introduction for clinical and research purposes of the Symptom Checklist-90(-R). Yet, its underlying dimensional structure has not been clearly delineated. A shift has been observed in the methods utilized-from predominantly exploratory factor analytic in nature in the first two decades or so to different confirmatory methods in recent years. A need remains to search for a structure that remains invariant across samples and nations. In that context, the present study attempted to replicate and extend recent findings yielded in a Hungarian general population sample (N = 2,874) with two psychiatric patient samples from Hungary (N = 972) and The Netherlands (N = 1,902). In doing so, four models were contrasted: the one-factor model, Derogatis' nine factor model, a second-ordered factor model, and a bi-factor model. The bi-factor model was shown to yield the closest fit to the data in both countries. Further studies are needed to determine the stable number and kind of subscale scores that reflect the specific (primary) symptoms best, that is, those subscales with minimal shared variance with the overall general psychological distress dimension.",
keywords = "Bi-factor model, Clinical sample, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Cross-cultural, Omega hierarchical, Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R)",
author = "R. Urb{\'a}n and Arrindell, {Willem A.} and Z. Demetrovics and Zsolt Unoka and Reinier Timman",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.039",
language = "English",
volume = "239",
pages = "265--274",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural confirmation of bi-factor models of a symptom distress measure

T2 - Symptom Checklist-90-Revised in clinical samples

AU - Urbán, R.

AU - Arrindell, Willem A.

AU - Demetrovics, Z.

AU - Unoka, Zsolt

AU - Timman, Reinier

PY - 2016/5/30

Y1 - 2016/5/30

N2 - Four decades have elapsed since the introduction for clinical and research purposes of the Symptom Checklist-90(-R). Yet, its underlying dimensional structure has not been clearly delineated. A shift has been observed in the methods utilized-from predominantly exploratory factor analytic in nature in the first two decades or so to different confirmatory methods in recent years. A need remains to search for a structure that remains invariant across samples and nations. In that context, the present study attempted to replicate and extend recent findings yielded in a Hungarian general population sample (N = 2,874) with two psychiatric patient samples from Hungary (N = 972) and The Netherlands (N = 1,902). In doing so, four models were contrasted: the one-factor model, Derogatis' nine factor model, a second-ordered factor model, and a bi-factor model. The bi-factor model was shown to yield the closest fit to the data in both countries. Further studies are needed to determine the stable number and kind of subscale scores that reflect the specific (primary) symptoms best, that is, those subscales with minimal shared variance with the overall general psychological distress dimension.

AB - Four decades have elapsed since the introduction for clinical and research purposes of the Symptom Checklist-90(-R). Yet, its underlying dimensional structure has not been clearly delineated. A shift has been observed in the methods utilized-from predominantly exploratory factor analytic in nature in the first two decades or so to different confirmatory methods in recent years. A need remains to search for a structure that remains invariant across samples and nations. In that context, the present study attempted to replicate and extend recent findings yielded in a Hungarian general population sample (N = 2,874) with two psychiatric patient samples from Hungary (N = 972) and The Netherlands (N = 1,902). In doing so, four models were contrasted: the one-factor model, Derogatis' nine factor model, a second-ordered factor model, and a bi-factor model. The bi-factor model was shown to yield the closest fit to the data in both countries. Further studies are needed to determine the stable number and kind of subscale scores that reflect the specific (primary) symptoms best, that is, those subscales with minimal shared variance with the overall general psychological distress dimension.

KW - Bi-factor model

KW - Clinical sample

KW - Confirmatory Factor Analysis

KW - Cross-cultural

KW - Omega hierarchical

KW - Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962283406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962283406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.039

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.039

M3 - Article

C2 - 27039011

AN - SCOPUS:84962283406

VL - 239

SP - 265

EP - 274

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

ER -