Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources

Riho Marja, Eneli Viik, Marika Mänd, James Phillips, Alexandra Maria Klein, P. Batáry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many parts of the world, farmland pollinators decreased significantly during the last half of the 20th century mainly due to land-use changes and agricultural intensification. We studied the effect of different typical crop rotations and agri-environment schemes (AES) on bumblebee diversity in Estonia. We compared species abundances between four crop rotation types (cereal rollover [no change from 1 year to the next], cereal to mass-flowering crops [hereafter MFC], MFC rollover and MFC to cereal fields) where all counts were conducted in the second year and in three farming types (conventional farming, organic farming and environmentally friendly management). We surveyed bumblebees and flower cover along 401 field margins in five consecutive years and recorded 20 species and more than 6,000 individuals. Abundances of long-tongued and threatened bumblebee species were higher at the field margins of cereal rollover fields than for the other three crop rotation types. In addition, cereal rollover field margins had higher abundances of medium colony species, generalists and forest-scrub species than MFC rollover and MFC to cereal or cereal to MFC field margins. Bumblebee species richness was higher at the field margins of both AES types than those of conventional farming. However, in general, the strongest driver of bumblebee presence was flower cover. Higher bumblebee abundances in cereal rollover field margins were probably owing to a concentration effect there and/or a dilution effect into MFC fields. Both AES schemes supported increasing flower cover in field margins and thereby diversity of bumblebees, indicating positive AES impacts upon wild pollinators. Synthesis and applications. Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee richness and abundance via the availability of flower resources, but crop rotation constrains bumblebees differently based on their traits. Therefore, future agri-environmental policy should account for these management options. Crop rotation could be a simple, but efficient solution to increase the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

field margin
crop rotation
cereal
flower
resource
pollinator
agricultural land
agri-environmental policy
agricultural intensification
organic farming
scrub
generalist
land use change
flowering
dilution
species richness
biodiversity
crop
effect

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Concentration effect
  • Dilution effect
  • Functional traits
  • Land use
  • Mass-flowering crops
  • Organic management
  • Pollinator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources. / Marja, Riho; Viik, Eneli; Mänd, Marika; Phillips, James; Klein, Alexandra Maria; Batáry, P.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marja, Riho ; Viik, Eneli ; Mänd, Marika ; Phillips, James ; Klein, Alexandra Maria ; Batáry, P. / Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018.
@article{098727a2f561462981fb228761f4d7ff,
title = "Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources",
abstract = "In many parts of the world, farmland pollinators decreased significantly during the last half of the 20th century mainly due to land-use changes and agricultural intensification. We studied the effect of different typical crop rotations and agri-environment schemes (AES) on bumblebee diversity in Estonia. We compared species abundances between four crop rotation types (cereal rollover [no change from 1 year to the next], cereal to mass-flowering crops [hereafter MFC], MFC rollover and MFC to cereal fields) where all counts were conducted in the second year and in three farming types (conventional farming, organic farming and environmentally friendly management). We surveyed bumblebees and flower cover along 401 field margins in five consecutive years and recorded 20 species and more than 6,000 individuals. Abundances of long-tongued and threatened bumblebee species were higher at the field margins of cereal rollover fields than for the other three crop rotation types. In addition, cereal rollover field margins had higher abundances of medium colony species, generalists and forest-scrub species than MFC rollover and MFC to cereal or cereal to MFC field margins. Bumblebee species richness was higher at the field margins of both AES types than those of conventional farming. However, in general, the strongest driver of bumblebee presence was flower cover. Higher bumblebee abundances in cereal rollover field margins were probably owing to a concentration effect there and/or a dilution effect into MFC fields. Both AES schemes supported increasing flower cover in field margins and thereby diversity of bumblebees, indicating positive AES impacts upon wild pollinators. Synthesis and applications. Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee richness and abundance via the availability of flower resources, but crop rotation constrains bumblebees differently based on their traits. Therefore, future agri-environmental policy should account for these management options. Crop rotation could be a simple, but efficient solution to increase the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Concentration effect, Dilution effect, Functional traits, Land use, Mass-flowering crops, Organic management, Pollinator",
author = "Riho Marja and Eneli Viik and Marika M{\"a}nd and James Phillips and Klein, {Alexandra Maria} and P. Bat{\'a}ry",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13119",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources

AU - Marja, Riho

AU - Viik, Eneli

AU - Mänd, Marika

AU - Phillips, James

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

AU - Batáry, P.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In many parts of the world, farmland pollinators decreased significantly during the last half of the 20th century mainly due to land-use changes and agricultural intensification. We studied the effect of different typical crop rotations and agri-environment schemes (AES) on bumblebee diversity in Estonia. We compared species abundances between four crop rotation types (cereal rollover [no change from 1 year to the next], cereal to mass-flowering crops [hereafter MFC], MFC rollover and MFC to cereal fields) where all counts were conducted in the second year and in three farming types (conventional farming, organic farming and environmentally friendly management). We surveyed bumblebees and flower cover along 401 field margins in five consecutive years and recorded 20 species and more than 6,000 individuals. Abundances of long-tongued and threatened bumblebee species were higher at the field margins of cereal rollover fields than for the other three crop rotation types. In addition, cereal rollover field margins had higher abundances of medium colony species, generalists and forest-scrub species than MFC rollover and MFC to cereal or cereal to MFC field margins. Bumblebee species richness was higher at the field margins of both AES types than those of conventional farming. However, in general, the strongest driver of bumblebee presence was flower cover. Higher bumblebee abundances in cereal rollover field margins were probably owing to a concentration effect there and/or a dilution effect into MFC fields. Both AES schemes supported increasing flower cover in field margins and thereby diversity of bumblebees, indicating positive AES impacts upon wild pollinators. Synthesis and applications. Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee richness and abundance via the availability of flower resources, but crop rotation constrains bumblebees differently based on their traits. Therefore, future agri-environmental policy should account for these management options. Crop rotation could be a simple, but efficient solution to increase the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes.

AB - In many parts of the world, farmland pollinators decreased significantly during the last half of the 20th century mainly due to land-use changes and agricultural intensification. We studied the effect of different typical crop rotations and agri-environment schemes (AES) on bumblebee diversity in Estonia. We compared species abundances between four crop rotation types (cereal rollover [no change from 1 year to the next], cereal to mass-flowering crops [hereafter MFC], MFC rollover and MFC to cereal fields) where all counts were conducted in the second year and in three farming types (conventional farming, organic farming and environmentally friendly management). We surveyed bumblebees and flower cover along 401 field margins in five consecutive years and recorded 20 species and more than 6,000 individuals. Abundances of long-tongued and threatened bumblebee species were higher at the field margins of cereal rollover fields than for the other three crop rotation types. In addition, cereal rollover field margins had higher abundances of medium colony species, generalists and forest-scrub species than MFC rollover and MFC to cereal or cereal to MFC field margins. Bumblebee species richness was higher at the field margins of both AES types than those of conventional farming. However, in general, the strongest driver of bumblebee presence was flower cover. Higher bumblebee abundances in cereal rollover field margins were probably owing to a concentration effect there and/or a dilution effect into MFC fields. Both AES schemes supported increasing flower cover in field margins and thereby diversity of bumblebees, indicating positive AES impacts upon wild pollinators. Synthesis and applications. Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee richness and abundance via the availability of flower resources, but crop rotation constrains bumblebees differently based on their traits. Therefore, future agri-environmental policy should account for these management options. Crop rotation could be a simple, but efficient solution to increase the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Concentration effect

KW - Dilution effect

KW - Functional traits

KW - Land use

KW - Mass-flowering crops

KW - Organic management

KW - Pollinator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042562350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042562350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13119

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13119

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042562350

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

ER -