Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument

András Papp, Krisztina Kis, J. Németh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Comparison between the results of measurements made using different types of automated-perimetry equipment is difficult, because of the lack of standardisation. The purpose of the study was to compare the two main indexes, mean deviation or mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), as measured by two widely used instruments (Interzeag Octopus 500EZ and Humphrey Field Analyser 740) in the same group of patients. Patients and Methods: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma were tested, and for 25 eyes the indexes measured using program G1 of the Octopus perimetry instrument were compared with those from program C30-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Results: Using the one-tailed Student t test, a significant difference was found between the MD and the PSD values of the Humphrey and of the Octopus perimetry equipments. However, subsequent use of the conversion formulas to adjust the measurements then indicated a good correlation between the two instruments (MD: r = 0.91; PSD: r = 0.79). Conclusion: MD and PSD values measured by the Octopus and Humphrey perimetry instruments are based on measurements made under significantly different conditions, so the direct comparison of the indexes is not reliable. Nonetheless, empirically valid conversion formulas exist and can be used to compare the perimetric results for a patient tested with the two types of instrument.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-90
Number of pages4
JournalOphthalmologica
Volume215
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Octopodiformes
Visual Field Tests
Equipment and Supplies
Students

Keywords

  • Automated perimetry
  • Open-angle glaucoma
  • Visual field

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument. / Papp, András; Kis, Krisztina; Németh, J.

In: Ophthalmologica, Vol. 215, No. 2, 2001, p. 87-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6923bd06c3043edacbf049854575b4d,
title = "Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument",
abstract = "Purpose: Comparison between the results of measurements made using different types of automated-perimetry equipment is difficult, because of the lack of standardisation. The purpose of the study was to compare the two main indexes, mean deviation or mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), as measured by two widely used instruments (Interzeag Octopus 500EZ and Humphrey Field Analyser 740) in the same group of patients. Patients and Methods: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma were tested, and for 25 eyes the indexes measured using program G1 of the Octopus perimetry instrument were compared with those from program C30-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Results: Using the one-tailed Student t test, a significant difference was found between the MD and the PSD values of the Humphrey and of the Octopus perimetry equipments. However, subsequent use of the conversion formulas to adjust the measurements then indicated a good correlation between the two instruments (MD: r = 0.91; PSD: r = 0.79). Conclusion: MD and PSD values measured by the Octopus and Humphrey perimetry instruments are based on measurements made under significantly different conditions, so the direct comparison of the indexes is not reliable. Nonetheless, empirically valid conversion formulas exist and can be used to compare the perimetric results for a patient tested with the two types of instrument.",
keywords = "Automated perimetry, Open-angle glaucoma, Visual field",
author = "Andr{\'a}s Papp and Krisztina Kis and J. N{\'e}meth",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1159/000050835",
language = "English",
volume = "215",
pages = "87--90",
journal = "Ophthalmologica",
issn = "0030-3755",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument

AU - Papp, András

AU - Kis, Krisztina

AU - Németh, J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Purpose: Comparison between the results of measurements made using different types of automated-perimetry equipment is difficult, because of the lack of standardisation. The purpose of the study was to compare the two main indexes, mean deviation or mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), as measured by two widely used instruments (Interzeag Octopus 500EZ and Humphrey Field Analyser 740) in the same group of patients. Patients and Methods: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma were tested, and for 25 eyes the indexes measured using program G1 of the Octopus perimetry instrument were compared with those from program C30-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Results: Using the one-tailed Student t test, a significant difference was found between the MD and the PSD values of the Humphrey and of the Octopus perimetry equipments. However, subsequent use of the conversion formulas to adjust the measurements then indicated a good correlation between the two instruments (MD: r = 0.91; PSD: r = 0.79). Conclusion: MD and PSD values measured by the Octopus and Humphrey perimetry instruments are based on measurements made under significantly different conditions, so the direct comparison of the indexes is not reliable. Nonetheless, empirically valid conversion formulas exist and can be used to compare the perimetric results for a patient tested with the two types of instrument.

AB - Purpose: Comparison between the results of measurements made using different types of automated-perimetry equipment is difficult, because of the lack of standardisation. The purpose of the study was to compare the two main indexes, mean deviation or mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), as measured by two widely used instruments (Interzeag Octopus 500EZ and Humphrey Field Analyser 740) in the same group of patients. Patients and Methods: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma were tested, and for 25 eyes the indexes measured using program G1 of the Octopus perimetry instrument were compared with those from program C30-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Results: Using the one-tailed Student t test, a significant difference was found between the MD and the PSD values of the Humphrey and of the Octopus perimetry equipments. However, subsequent use of the conversion formulas to adjust the measurements then indicated a good correlation between the two instruments (MD: r = 0.91; PSD: r = 0.79). Conclusion: MD and PSD values measured by the Octopus and Humphrey perimetry instruments are based on measurements made under significantly different conditions, so the direct comparison of the indexes is not reliable. Nonetheless, empirically valid conversion formulas exist and can be used to compare the perimetric results for a patient tested with the two types of instrument.

KW - Automated perimetry

KW - Open-angle glaucoma

KW - Visual field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035103740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035103740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000050835

DO - 10.1159/000050835

M3 - Article

VL - 215

SP - 87

EP - 90

JO - Ophthalmologica

JF - Ophthalmologica

SN - 0030-3755

IS - 2

ER -