Competitions between prosocial exclusions and punishments in finite populations

Linjie Liu, Xiaojie Chen, Attila Szolnoki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prosocial punishment has been proved to be a powerful mean to promote cooperation. Recent studies have found that social exclusion, which indeed can be regarded as a kind of punishment, can also support cooperation. However, if prosocial punishment and exclusion are both present, it is still unclear which strategy is more advantageous to curb free-riders. Here we first study the direct competition between different types of punishment and exclusion. We find that pool (peer) exclusion can always outperform pool (peer) punishment both in the optional and in the compulsory public goods game, no matter whether second-order sanctioning is considered or not. Furthermore, peer exclusion does better than pool exclusion both in the optional and in the compulsory game, but the situation is reversed in the presence of second-order exclusion. Finally, we extend the competition among all possible sanctioning strategies and find that peer exclusion can outperform all other strategies in the absence of second-order exclusion and punishment, while pool exclusion prevails when second-order sanctioning is possible. Our results demonstrate that exclusion is a more powerful strategy than punishment for the resolution of social dilemmas.

Original languageEnglish
Article number46634
JournalScientific reports
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 19 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Competitions between prosocial exclusions and punishments in finite populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this