Comparison of pattern VEP results acquired using CRT and TFT stimulators in the clinical practice

Balázs Vince Nagy, Szabolcs Gémesi, Dávid Heller, András Magyar, A. Farkas, György Ábrahám, Balázs Varsányi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are several electrophysiological systems available commercially. Usually, control groups are required to compare their results, due to the differences between display types. Our aim was to examine the differences between CRT and LCD/TFT stimulators used in pattern VEP responses performed according to the ISCEV standards. We also aimed to check different contrast values toward thresholds. In order to obtain more precise results, we intended to measure the intensity and temporal response characteristics of the monitors with photometric methods. To record VEP signals, a Roland RetiPort electrophysiological system was used. The pattern VEP tests were carried out according to ISCEV protocols on a CRT and a TFT monitor consecutively. Achromatic checkerboard pattern was used at three different contrast levels (maximal, 75, 25%) using 1° and 15′ check sizes. Both CRT and TFT displays were luminance and contrast matched, according to the gamma functions based on measurements at several DAC values. Monitor-specific luminance parameters were measured by means of spectroradiometric instruments. Temporal differences between the displays' electronic and radiometric signals were measured with a device specifically built for the purpose. We tested six healthy control subjects with visual acuity of at least 20/20. The tests were performed on each subject three times on different days. We found significant temporal differences between the CRT and the LCD monitors at all contrast levels and spatial frequencies. In average, the latency times were 9.0 ms (±3.3 ms) longer with the TFT stimulator. This value is in accordance with the average of the measured TFT input-output temporal difference values (10.1 ± 2.2 ms). According to our findings, measuring the temporal parameters of the TFT monitor with an adequately calibrated measurement setup and correcting the VEP data with the resulting values, the VEP signals obtained with different display types can be transformed to be comparable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-162
Number of pages6
JournalDocumenta Ophthalmologica
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Healthy Volunteers
Equipment and Supplies
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Computer display
  • CRT
  • LCD/TFT
  • Photometry
  • Visual evoked potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Comparison of pattern VEP results acquired using CRT and TFT stimulators in the clinical practice. / Nagy, Balázs Vince; Gémesi, Szabolcs; Heller, Dávid; Magyar, András; Farkas, A.; Ábrahám, György; Varsányi, Balázs.

In: Documenta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 122, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 157-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagy, Balázs Vince ; Gémesi, Szabolcs ; Heller, Dávid ; Magyar, András ; Farkas, A. ; Ábrahám, György ; Varsányi, Balázs. / Comparison of pattern VEP results acquired using CRT and TFT stimulators in the clinical practice. In: Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2011 ; Vol. 122, No. 3. pp. 157-162.
@article{ec29a06e85fa4f478cb50761f10946de,
title = "Comparison of pattern VEP results acquired using CRT and TFT stimulators in the clinical practice",
abstract = "There are several electrophysiological systems available commercially. Usually, control groups are required to compare their results, due to the differences between display types. Our aim was to examine the differences between CRT and LCD/TFT stimulators used in pattern VEP responses performed according to the ISCEV standards. We also aimed to check different contrast values toward thresholds. In order to obtain more precise results, we intended to measure the intensity and temporal response characteristics of the monitors with photometric methods. To record VEP signals, a Roland RetiPort electrophysiological system was used. The pattern VEP tests were carried out according to ISCEV protocols on a CRT and a TFT monitor consecutively. Achromatic checkerboard pattern was used at three different contrast levels (maximal, 75, 25{\%}) using 1° and 15′ check sizes. Both CRT and TFT displays were luminance and contrast matched, according to the gamma functions based on measurements at several DAC values. Monitor-specific luminance parameters were measured by means of spectroradiometric instruments. Temporal differences between the displays' electronic and radiometric signals were measured with a device specifically built for the purpose. We tested six healthy control subjects with visual acuity of at least 20/20. The tests were performed on each subject three times on different days. We found significant temporal differences between the CRT and the LCD monitors at all contrast levels and spatial frequencies. In average, the latency times were 9.0 ms (±3.3 ms) longer with the TFT stimulator. This value is in accordance with the average of the measured TFT input-output temporal difference values (10.1 ± 2.2 ms). According to our findings, measuring the temporal parameters of the TFT monitor with an adequately calibrated measurement setup and correcting the VEP data with the resulting values, the VEP signals obtained with different display types can be transformed to be comparable.",
keywords = "Computer display, CRT, LCD/TFT, Photometry, Visual evoked potential",
author = "Nagy, {Bal{\'a}zs Vince} and Szabolcs G{\'e}mesi and D{\'a}vid Heller and Andr{\'a}s Magyar and A. Farkas and Gy{\"o}rgy {\'A}brah{\'a}m and Bal{\'a}zs Vars{\'a}nyi",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10633-011-9270-5",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "157--162",
journal = "Documenta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "0012-4486",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of pattern VEP results acquired using CRT and TFT stimulators in the clinical practice

AU - Nagy, Balázs Vince

AU - Gémesi, Szabolcs

AU - Heller, Dávid

AU - Magyar, András

AU - Farkas, A.

AU - Ábrahám, György

AU - Varsányi, Balázs

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - There are several electrophysiological systems available commercially. Usually, control groups are required to compare their results, due to the differences between display types. Our aim was to examine the differences between CRT and LCD/TFT stimulators used in pattern VEP responses performed according to the ISCEV standards. We also aimed to check different contrast values toward thresholds. In order to obtain more precise results, we intended to measure the intensity and temporal response characteristics of the monitors with photometric methods. To record VEP signals, a Roland RetiPort electrophysiological system was used. The pattern VEP tests were carried out according to ISCEV protocols on a CRT and a TFT monitor consecutively. Achromatic checkerboard pattern was used at three different contrast levels (maximal, 75, 25%) using 1° and 15′ check sizes. Both CRT and TFT displays were luminance and contrast matched, according to the gamma functions based on measurements at several DAC values. Monitor-specific luminance parameters were measured by means of spectroradiometric instruments. Temporal differences between the displays' electronic and radiometric signals were measured with a device specifically built for the purpose. We tested six healthy control subjects with visual acuity of at least 20/20. The tests were performed on each subject three times on different days. We found significant temporal differences between the CRT and the LCD monitors at all contrast levels and spatial frequencies. In average, the latency times were 9.0 ms (±3.3 ms) longer with the TFT stimulator. This value is in accordance with the average of the measured TFT input-output temporal difference values (10.1 ± 2.2 ms). According to our findings, measuring the temporal parameters of the TFT monitor with an adequately calibrated measurement setup and correcting the VEP data with the resulting values, the VEP signals obtained with different display types can be transformed to be comparable.

AB - There are several electrophysiological systems available commercially. Usually, control groups are required to compare their results, due to the differences between display types. Our aim was to examine the differences between CRT and LCD/TFT stimulators used in pattern VEP responses performed according to the ISCEV standards. We also aimed to check different contrast values toward thresholds. In order to obtain more precise results, we intended to measure the intensity and temporal response characteristics of the monitors with photometric methods. To record VEP signals, a Roland RetiPort electrophysiological system was used. The pattern VEP tests were carried out according to ISCEV protocols on a CRT and a TFT monitor consecutively. Achromatic checkerboard pattern was used at three different contrast levels (maximal, 75, 25%) using 1° and 15′ check sizes. Both CRT and TFT displays were luminance and contrast matched, according to the gamma functions based on measurements at several DAC values. Monitor-specific luminance parameters were measured by means of spectroradiometric instruments. Temporal differences between the displays' electronic and radiometric signals were measured with a device specifically built for the purpose. We tested six healthy control subjects with visual acuity of at least 20/20. The tests were performed on each subject three times on different days. We found significant temporal differences between the CRT and the LCD monitors at all contrast levels and spatial frequencies. In average, the latency times were 9.0 ms (±3.3 ms) longer with the TFT stimulator. This value is in accordance with the average of the measured TFT input-output temporal difference values (10.1 ± 2.2 ms). According to our findings, measuring the temporal parameters of the TFT monitor with an adequately calibrated measurement setup and correcting the VEP data with the resulting values, the VEP signals obtained with different display types can be transformed to be comparable.

KW - Computer display

KW - CRT

KW - LCD/TFT

KW - Photometry

KW - Visual evoked potential

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959703483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959703483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10633-011-9270-5

DO - 10.1007/s10633-011-9270-5

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 157

EP - 162

JO - Documenta Ophthalmologica

JF - Documenta Ophthalmologica

SN - 0012-4486

IS - 3

ER -