Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs

Andras Vass-Varnai, John Parry, Gergely Toth, Sandor Ress, Gabor Farkas, A. Poppe, M. Rencz

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we review the history of the static (continuous) and dynamic (pulsed) test methods described in JEDEC JESD51-1 [1]. Written in 1995, there has not been, to date and to the knowledge of the authors, any systematic review to these different approaches to the transient thermal testing of packaged ICs and LEDs. Commercially available and in-house test equipment perform either transient thermal testing according to one approach or the other, but not both.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012
Pages594-597
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012 - Singapore, Singapore
Duration: Dec 5 2012Dec 7 2012

Other

Other2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012
CountrySingapore
CitySingapore
Period12/5/1212/7/12

Fingerprint

Light emitting diodes
Testing
Hot Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Cite this

Vass-Varnai, A., Parry, J., Toth, G., Ress, S., Farkas, G., Poppe, A., & Rencz, M. (2012). Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012 (pp. 594-597). [6507151] https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507151

Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs. / Vass-Varnai, Andras; Parry, John; Toth, Gergely; Ress, Sandor; Farkas, Gabor; Poppe, A.; Rencz, M.

Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012. 2012. p. 594-597 6507151.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Vass-Varnai, A, Parry, J, Toth, G, Ress, S, Farkas, G, Poppe, A & Rencz, M 2012, Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs. in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012., 6507151, pp. 594-597, 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012, Singapore, Singapore, 12/5/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507151
Vass-Varnai A, Parry J, Toth G, Ress S, Farkas G, Poppe A et al. Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012. 2012. p. 594-597. 6507151 https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507151
Vass-Varnai, Andras ; Parry, John ; Toth, Gergely ; Ress, Sandor ; Farkas, Gabor ; Poppe, A. ; Rencz, M. / Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012. 2012. pp. 594-597
@inproceedings{ed7701378bf741e8b6d4e9c8cef4d37f,
title = "Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs",
abstract = "In this paper we review the history of the static (continuous) and dynamic (pulsed) test methods described in JEDEC JESD51-1 [1]. Written in 1995, there has not been, to date and to the knowledge of the authors, any systematic review to these different approaches to the transient thermal testing of packaged ICs and LEDs. Commercially available and in-house test equipment perform either transient thermal testing according to one approach or the other, but not both.",
author = "Andras Vass-Varnai and John Parry and Gergely Toth and Sandor Ress and Gabor Farkas and A. Poppe and M. Rencz",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507151",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781467345514",
pages = "594--597",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of JEDEC dynamic and static test methods for the thermal characterization of power LEDs

AU - Vass-Varnai, Andras

AU - Parry, John

AU - Toth, Gergely

AU - Ress, Sandor

AU - Farkas, Gabor

AU - Poppe, A.

AU - Rencz, M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this paper we review the history of the static (continuous) and dynamic (pulsed) test methods described in JEDEC JESD51-1 [1]. Written in 1995, there has not been, to date and to the knowledge of the authors, any systematic review to these different approaches to the transient thermal testing of packaged ICs and LEDs. Commercially available and in-house test equipment perform either transient thermal testing according to one approach or the other, but not both.

AB - In this paper we review the history of the static (continuous) and dynamic (pulsed) test methods described in JEDEC JESD51-1 [1]. Written in 1995, there has not been, to date and to the knowledge of the authors, any systematic review to these different approaches to the transient thermal testing of packaged ICs and LEDs. Commercially available and in-house test equipment perform either transient thermal testing according to one approach or the other, but not both.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879779417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879779417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507151

DO - 10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507151

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781467345514

SP - 594

EP - 597

BT - Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, EPTC 2012

ER -