Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter

Gabor Nemeth, Alexis Tsorbatzoglou, Katalin Kertesz, Attila Vajas, A. Berta, L. Módis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry and a new optical method using partial coherence interferometry (PCI). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Health and Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Methods: The study comprised 136 eyes of 70 patients whose spherical refractive error was not greater than ±6.0 diopters (D) and whose keratometric astigmatism was not greater than 2.0 D. Central corneal thickness was measured 5 times with a new optical device (ACMaster, Zeiss) and with an ultrasonic pachymeter (AL-2000, Tomey). All measurements were obtained by the same investigator. Results: Mean CCT was 531.2 μm ± 3.9 (SD) with PCI and 547.8 ± 36.0 μm with the ultrasonic device. The difference between groups was significant (P = .001). There was no difference between CCT values measured in right and left eyes (P = .55) with ultrasonography and PCI (P = .67). The coefficient variation was 0.73% for PCI and 6.5% for ultrasonography. Correlation between the CCT measurements with both devices was strong and statistically significant (Spearman correlation = .91, P = .001). Conclusions: Mean CCT values measured by the PCI method were significantly smaller than those measured by the ultrasonic device. Central corneal thickness measured with PCI is more reproducible and seems to be more reliable than that measured by ultrasonography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-463
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Corneal Pachymetry
Interferometry
Optical Devices
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonography
Equipment and Supplies
Refractive Errors
Astigmatism
Hungary
Ophthalmology
Research Personnel
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. / Nemeth, Gabor; Tsorbatzoglou, Alexis; Kertesz, Katalin; Vajas, Attila; Berta, A.; Módis, L.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 460-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1cf16a9954694ab99045213b0fb054da,
title = "Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry and a new optical method using partial coherence interferometry (PCI). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Health and Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Methods: The study comprised 136 eyes of 70 patients whose spherical refractive error was not greater than ±6.0 diopters (D) and whose keratometric astigmatism was not greater than 2.0 D. Central corneal thickness was measured 5 times with a new optical device (ACMaster, Zeiss) and with an ultrasonic pachymeter (AL-2000, Tomey). All measurements were obtained by the same investigator. Results: Mean CCT was 531.2 μm ± 3.9 (SD) with PCI and 547.8 ± 36.0 μm with the ultrasonic device. The difference between groups was significant (P = .001). There was no difference between CCT values measured in right and left eyes (P = .55) with ultrasonography and PCI (P = .67). The coefficient variation was 0.73{\%} for PCI and 6.5{\%} for ultrasonography. Correlation between the CCT measurements with both devices was strong and statistically significant (Spearman correlation = .91, P = .001). Conclusions: Mean CCT values measured by the PCI method were significantly smaller than those measured by the ultrasonic device. Central corneal thickness measured with PCI is more reproducible and seems to be more reliable than that measured by ultrasonography.",
author = "Gabor Nemeth and Alexis Tsorbatzoglou and Katalin Kertesz and Attila Vajas and A. Berta and L. M{\'o}dis",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.138",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "460--463",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter

AU - Nemeth, Gabor

AU - Tsorbatzoglou, Alexis

AU - Kertesz, Katalin

AU - Vajas, Attila

AU - Berta, A.

AU - Módis, L.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry and a new optical method using partial coherence interferometry (PCI). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Health and Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Methods: The study comprised 136 eyes of 70 patients whose spherical refractive error was not greater than ±6.0 diopters (D) and whose keratometric astigmatism was not greater than 2.0 D. Central corneal thickness was measured 5 times with a new optical device (ACMaster, Zeiss) and with an ultrasonic pachymeter (AL-2000, Tomey). All measurements were obtained by the same investigator. Results: Mean CCT was 531.2 μm ± 3.9 (SD) with PCI and 547.8 ± 36.0 μm with the ultrasonic device. The difference between groups was significant (P = .001). There was no difference between CCT values measured in right and left eyes (P = .55) with ultrasonography and PCI (P = .67). The coefficient variation was 0.73% for PCI and 6.5% for ultrasonography. Correlation between the CCT measurements with both devices was strong and statistically significant (Spearman correlation = .91, P = .001). Conclusions: Mean CCT values measured by the PCI method were significantly smaller than those measured by the ultrasonic device. Central corneal thickness measured with PCI is more reproducible and seems to be more reliable than that measured by ultrasonography.

AB - Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry and a new optical method using partial coherence interferometry (PCI). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Health and Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Methods: The study comprised 136 eyes of 70 patients whose spherical refractive error was not greater than ±6.0 diopters (D) and whose keratometric astigmatism was not greater than 2.0 D. Central corneal thickness was measured 5 times with a new optical device (ACMaster, Zeiss) and with an ultrasonic pachymeter (AL-2000, Tomey). All measurements were obtained by the same investigator. Results: Mean CCT was 531.2 μm ± 3.9 (SD) with PCI and 547.8 ± 36.0 μm with the ultrasonic device. The difference between groups was significant (P = .001). There was no difference between CCT values measured in right and left eyes (P = .55) with ultrasonography and PCI (P = .67). The coefficient variation was 0.73% for PCI and 6.5% for ultrasonography. Correlation between the CCT measurements with both devices was strong and statistically significant (Spearman correlation = .91, P = .001). Conclusions: Mean CCT values measured by the PCI method were significantly smaller than those measured by the ultrasonic device. Central corneal thickness measured with PCI is more reproducible and seems to be more reliable than that measured by ultrasonography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646046444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646046444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.138

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.138

M3 - Article

C2 - 16631058

AN - SCOPUS:33646046444

VL - 32

SP - 460

EP - 463

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 3

ER -