Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Abinaya Chandrasekaran, Hasan X. Avci, Anna Ochalek, Lone N. Rösingh, Kinga Molnár, L. László, Tamás Bellák, Annamária Téglási, Krisztina Pesti, A. Mike, Phetcharat Phanthong, Orsolya Bíró, Vanessa Hall, Narisorn Kitiyanant, Karl Heinz Krause, Julianna Kobolák, A. Dinnyés

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs′ genetic background.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-151
Number of pages13
JournalStem Cell Research
Volume25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Stem Cells
Neurons
Neurites
Prosencephalon
Neuroglia
Astrocytes
Electron Microscopy
Flow Cytometry
Immunohistochemistry
Proteins

Keywords

  • 2D-3D neural induction
  • Electron microscopy
  • hiPSC
  • Neural induction
  • Neural progenitor cells
  • Patch clamp

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. / Chandrasekaran, Abinaya; Avci, Hasan X.; Ochalek, Anna; Rösingh, Lone N.; Molnár, Kinga; László, L.; Bellák, Tamás; Téglási, Annamária; Pesti, Krisztina; Mike, A.; Phanthong, Phetcharat; Bíró, Orsolya; Hall, Vanessa; Kitiyanant, Narisorn; Krause, Karl Heinz; Kobolák, Julianna; Dinnyés, A.

In: Stem Cell Research, Vol. 25, 01.12.2017, p. 139-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chandrasekaran, A, Avci, HX, Ochalek, A, Rösingh, LN, Molnár, K, László, L, Bellák, T, Téglási, A, Pesti, K, Mike, A, Phanthong, P, Bíró, O, Hall, V, Kitiyanant, N, Krause, KH, Kobolák, J & Dinnyés, A 2017, 'Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells', Stem Cell Research, vol. 25, pp. 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010
Chandrasekaran, Abinaya ; Avci, Hasan X. ; Ochalek, Anna ; Rösingh, Lone N. ; Molnár, Kinga ; László, L. ; Bellák, Tamás ; Téglási, Annamária ; Pesti, Krisztina ; Mike, A. ; Phanthong, Phetcharat ; Bíró, Orsolya ; Hall, Vanessa ; Kitiyanant, Narisorn ; Krause, Karl Heinz ; Kobolák, Julianna ; Dinnyés, A. / Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. In: Stem Cell Research. 2017 ; Vol. 25. pp. 139-151.
@article{f2f2a249007f451a8a0da81759179710,
title = "Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells",
abstract = "Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs′ genetic background.",
keywords = "2D-3D neural induction, Electron microscopy, hiPSC, Neural induction, Neural progenitor cells, Patch clamp",
author = "Abinaya Chandrasekaran and Avci, {Hasan X.} and Anna Ochalek and R{\"o}singh, {Lone N.} and Kinga Moln{\'a}r and L. L{\'a}szl{\'o} and Tam{\'a}s Bell{\'a}k and Annam{\'a}ria T{\'e}gl{\'a}si and Krisztina Pesti and A. Mike and Phetcharat Phanthong and Orsolya B{\'i}r{\'o} and Vanessa Hall and Narisorn Kitiyanant and Krause, {Karl Heinz} and Julianna Kobol{\'a}k and A. Dinny{\'e}s",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "139--151",
journal = "Stem Cell Research",
issn = "1873-5061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells

AU - Chandrasekaran, Abinaya

AU - Avci, Hasan X.

AU - Ochalek, Anna

AU - Rösingh, Lone N.

AU - Molnár, Kinga

AU - László, L.

AU - Bellák, Tamás

AU - Téglási, Annamária

AU - Pesti, Krisztina

AU - Mike, A.

AU - Phanthong, Phetcharat

AU - Bíró, Orsolya

AU - Hall, Vanessa

AU - Kitiyanant, Narisorn

AU - Krause, Karl Heinz

AU - Kobolák, Julianna

AU - Dinnyés, A.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs′ genetic background.

AB - Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs′ genetic background.

KW - 2D-3D neural induction

KW - Electron microscopy

KW - hiPSC

KW - Neural induction

KW - Neural progenitor cells

KW - Patch clamp

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033404451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033404451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 29128818

AN - SCOPUS:85033404451

VL - 25

SP - 139

EP - 151

JO - Stem Cell Research

JF - Stem Cell Research

SN - 1873-5061

ER -