Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies

E. Holman, M. Salah, Csaba Tóth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. Results: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20% in 12.2% of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4%. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the unilateral procedure group as well (8%), mostly in cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. The SBPN was not more hazardous than unilateral PCNL (complication rate 11.3% v 14.3%, respectively). In both groups, most of the complications were in proportion to the size and difficulties of the stones. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and advantageous procedure that is not more hazardous than the separate PCNL in cases of bilateral large stone burdens. To our knowledge, these are the largest reported series of these procedures and the only comparative analysis of SBPN and PCNL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-36
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Kidney
Blood Group Antigens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies. / Holman, E.; Salah, M.; Tóth, Csaba.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, p. 33-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ed2dea654b24669946403495b9cef5e,
title = "Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. Results: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20{\%} in 12.2{\%} of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4{\%}. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the unilateral procedure group as well (8{\%}), mostly in cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. The SBPN was not more hazardous than unilateral PCNL (complication rate 11.3{\%} v 14.3{\%}, respectively). In both groups, most of the complications were in proportion to the size and difficulties of the stones. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and advantageous procedure that is not more hazardous than the separate PCNL in cases of bilateral large stone burdens. To our knowledge, these are the largest reported series of these procedures and the only comparative analysis of SBPN and PCNL.",
author = "E. Holman and M. Salah and Csaba T{\'o}th",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "33--36",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies

AU - Holman, E.

AU - Salah, M.

AU - Tóth, Csaba

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Purpose: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. Results: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20% in 12.2% of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4%. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the unilateral procedure group as well (8%), mostly in cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. The SBPN was not more hazardous than unilateral PCNL (complication rate 11.3% v 14.3%, respectively). In both groups, most of the complications were in proportion to the size and difficulties of the stones. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and advantageous procedure that is not more hazardous than the separate PCNL in cases of bilateral large stone burdens. To our knowledge, these are the largest reported series of these procedures and the only comparative analysis of SBPN and PCNL.

AB - Purpose: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. Results: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20% in 12.2% of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4%. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the unilateral procedure group as well (8%), mostly in cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. The SBPN was not more hazardous than unilateral PCNL (complication rate 11.3% v 14.3%, respectively). In both groups, most of the complications were in proportion to the size and difficulties of the stones. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and advantageous procedure that is not more hazardous than the separate PCNL in cases of bilateral large stone burdens. To our knowledge, these are the largest reported series of these procedures and the only comparative analysis of SBPN and PCNL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036192582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036192582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11890448

AN - SCOPUS:0036192582

VL - 16

SP - 33

EP - 36

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 1

ER -