148 egy ülésben végzett kétoldali és 300 egyoldali percutan nephrolithotomia összehasonlító elemzése

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison of 148 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of the study is the comparison of the results and complications of the simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and the unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Author compares the result and complications of 148 SBPN with 300 unilateral PCNL. The success rates, the pre- and postoperative laboratory results, the complications are compared, evaluated on the basis of the stones' size and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks as well. There were no significant difference between the results and complications of the SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself does not cause more blood loss than the PCNL. Either in the bilateral or in the unilateral group the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks. After the SBPN the kidney function improved with more than 20% in 12.2% of the cases and worsened temporarily for more than 3 days only in 4% of the cases. On the other side temporary kidney function worsening occured in the unilateral group as well, mostly in the cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. Regarding the complications the SBPN itself is not more hazardous than the unilateral PCNL, most of the complications are in proportion to the size and the difficultiness of the stones. On the basis of the comparison it can be concluded that concerning the evaluated parameters the SBPN is equivalent or more beneficial for the patients than the unilateral PCNL.

Original languageHungarian
Pages (from-to)229-236
Number of pages8
JournalMagyar Urologia
Volume12
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Kidney
Blood Group Antigens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

148 egy ülésben végzett kétoldali és 300 egyoldali percutan nephrolithotomia összehasonlító elemzése. / Holman, E.

In: Magyar Urologia, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2000, p. 229-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{348839fc85ab44f38bda33f4996b2c07,
title = "148 egy {\"u}l{\'e}sben v{\'e}gzett k{\'e}toldali {\'e}s 300 egyoldali percutan nephrolithotomia {\"o}sszehasonl{\'i}t{\'o} elemz{\'e}se",
abstract = "The goal of the study is the comparison of the results and complications of the simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and the unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Author compares the result and complications of 148 SBPN with 300 unilateral PCNL. The success rates, the pre- and postoperative laboratory results, the complications are compared, evaluated on the basis of the stones' size and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks as well. There were no significant difference between the results and complications of the SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself does not cause more blood loss than the PCNL. Either in the bilateral or in the unilateral group the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks. After the SBPN the kidney function improved with more than 20{\%} in 12.2{\%} of the cases and worsened temporarily for more than 3 days only in 4{\%} of the cases. On the other side temporary kidney function worsening occured in the unilateral group as well, mostly in the cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. Regarding the complications the SBPN itself is not more hazardous than the unilateral PCNL, most of the complications are in proportion to the size and the difficultiness of the stones. On the basis of the comparison it can be concluded that concerning the evaluated parameters the SBPN is equivalent or more beneficial for the patients than the unilateral PCNL.",
keywords = "Bilateral, Kidney stone, Nephrolithotomy, Unilateral",
author = "E. Holman",
year = "2000",
language = "Hungarian",
volume = "12",
pages = "229--236",
journal = "Magyar Urologia",
issn = "0864-8921",
publisher = "Society of Hungarian Urological Surgeons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 148 egy ülésben végzett kétoldali és 300 egyoldali percutan nephrolithotomia összehasonlító elemzése

AU - Holman, E.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The goal of the study is the comparison of the results and complications of the simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and the unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Author compares the result and complications of 148 SBPN with 300 unilateral PCNL. The success rates, the pre- and postoperative laboratory results, the complications are compared, evaluated on the basis of the stones' size and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks as well. There were no significant difference between the results and complications of the SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself does not cause more blood loss than the PCNL. Either in the bilateral or in the unilateral group the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks. After the SBPN the kidney function improved with more than 20% in 12.2% of the cases and worsened temporarily for more than 3 days only in 4% of the cases. On the other side temporary kidney function worsening occured in the unilateral group as well, mostly in the cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. Regarding the complications the SBPN itself is not more hazardous than the unilateral PCNL, most of the complications are in proportion to the size and the difficultiness of the stones. On the basis of the comparison it can be concluded that concerning the evaluated parameters the SBPN is equivalent or more beneficial for the patients than the unilateral PCNL.

AB - The goal of the study is the comparison of the results and complications of the simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and the unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Author compares the result and complications of 148 SBPN with 300 unilateral PCNL. The success rates, the pre- and postoperative laboratory results, the complications are compared, evaluated on the basis of the stones' size and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks as well. There were no significant difference between the results and complications of the SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself does not cause more blood loss than the PCNL. Either in the bilateral or in the unilateral group the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of the created nephrostomy tracks. After the SBPN the kidney function improved with more than 20% in 12.2% of the cases and worsened temporarily for more than 3 days only in 4% of the cases. On the other side temporary kidney function worsening occured in the unilateral group as well, mostly in the cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. Regarding the complications the SBPN itself is not more hazardous than the unilateral PCNL, most of the complications are in proportion to the size and the difficultiness of the stones. On the basis of the comparison it can be concluded that concerning the evaluated parameters the SBPN is equivalent or more beneficial for the patients than the unilateral PCNL.

KW - Bilateral

KW - Kidney stone

KW - Nephrolithotomy

KW - Unilateral

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18244428144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18244428144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:18244428144

VL - 12

SP - 229

EP - 236

JO - Magyar Urologia

JF - Magyar Urologia

SN - 0864-8921

IS - 3

ER -