Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta-analysis

Kevin Darras, P. Batáry, Brett Furnas, Antonio Celis-Murillo, Steven L. Van Wilgenburg, Yeni A. Mulyani, Teja Tscharntke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Autonomous sound recording is a promising sampling method for birds and other vocalizing terrestrial wildlife. However, while there are clear advantages of passive acoustic monitoring methods over classical point counts conducted by humans, it has been difficult to quantitatively assess how they compare in their sampling performance. Quantitative comparisons of species richness between acoustic recorders and human point counts in bird surveys have previously been hampered by the differing and often unknown detection ranges or sound detection spaces among sampling methods. We performed two meta-analyses based on 28 studies where bird point counts were paired with sound recordings at the same sampling sites. We compared alpha and gamma richness estimated by both survey methods after equalizing their effective detection ranges. We further assessed the influence of technical sound recording specifications (microphone signal-to-noise ratio, height and number) on the bird sampling performance of sound recorders compared to unlimited radius point counts. We show that after standardizing detection ranges, alpha and gamma richness from both methods are statistically indistinguishable, while there might be an avoidance effect in point counts. Furthermore, we show that microphone signal-to-noise ratio (a measure of its quality), height and number positively affect performance through increasing the detection range, allowing sound recorders to match the performance of human point counts. Synthesis and applications. We demonstrate that when used properly, high-end sound recording systems can sample terrestrial wildlife just as well as human observers conducting point counts. Correspondingly, we suggest a first standard methodology for sampling birds with autonomous sound recorders to obtain results comparable to point counts and enable practical sampling. We also give recommendations for carrying out effective surveys and making the most out of autonomous sound recorders.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

meta-analysis
bird
sampling
signal-to-noise ratio
acoustics
sound
survey method
species richness
detection
methodology
method
monitoring

Keywords

  • Autonomous sound recorder
  • Bird survey
  • Passive acoustic monitoring
  • Point count
  • Sampling methods
  • Signal-to-noise ratio
  • Sound detection space
  • Species richness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Darras, K., Batáry, P., Furnas, B., Celis-Murillo, A., Van Wilgenburg, S. L., Mulyani, Y. A., & Tscharntke, T. (Accepted/In press). Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13229

Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys : A meta-analysis. / Darras, Kevin; Batáry, P.; Furnas, Brett; Celis-Murillo, Antonio; Van Wilgenburg, Steven L.; Mulyani, Yeni A.; Tscharntke, Teja.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Darras, Kevin ; Batáry, P. ; Furnas, Brett ; Celis-Murillo, Antonio ; Van Wilgenburg, Steven L. ; Mulyani, Yeni A. ; Tscharntke, Teja. / Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys : A meta-analysis. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018.
@article{478e34c9fddc4293977d469a93d71773,
title = "Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Autonomous sound recording is a promising sampling method for birds and other vocalizing terrestrial wildlife. However, while there are clear advantages of passive acoustic monitoring methods over classical point counts conducted by humans, it has been difficult to quantitatively assess how they compare in their sampling performance. Quantitative comparisons of species richness between acoustic recorders and human point counts in bird surveys have previously been hampered by the differing and often unknown detection ranges or sound detection spaces among sampling methods. We performed two meta-analyses based on 28 studies where bird point counts were paired with sound recordings at the same sampling sites. We compared alpha and gamma richness estimated by both survey methods after equalizing their effective detection ranges. We further assessed the influence of technical sound recording specifications (microphone signal-to-noise ratio, height and number) on the bird sampling performance of sound recorders compared to unlimited radius point counts. We show that after standardizing detection ranges, alpha and gamma richness from both methods are statistically indistinguishable, while there might be an avoidance effect in point counts. Furthermore, we show that microphone signal-to-noise ratio (a measure of its quality), height and number positively affect performance through increasing the detection range, allowing sound recorders to match the performance of human point counts. Synthesis and applications. We demonstrate that when used properly, high-end sound recording systems can sample terrestrial wildlife just as well as human observers conducting point counts. Correspondingly, we suggest a first standard methodology for sampling birds with autonomous sound recorders to obtain results comparable to point counts and enable practical sampling. We also give recommendations for carrying out effective surveys and making the most out of autonomous sound recorders.",
keywords = "Autonomous sound recorder, Bird survey, Passive acoustic monitoring, Point count, Sampling methods, Signal-to-noise ratio, Sound detection space, Species richness",
author = "Kevin Darras and P. Bat{\'a}ry and Brett Furnas and Antonio Celis-Murillo and {Van Wilgenburg}, {Steven L.} and Mulyani, {Yeni A.} and Teja Tscharntke",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13229",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Darras, Kevin

AU - Batáry, P.

AU - Furnas, Brett

AU - Celis-Murillo, Antonio

AU - Van Wilgenburg, Steven L.

AU - Mulyani, Yeni A.

AU - Tscharntke, Teja

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Autonomous sound recording is a promising sampling method for birds and other vocalizing terrestrial wildlife. However, while there are clear advantages of passive acoustic monitoring methods over classical point counts conducted by humans, it has been difficult to quantitatively assess how they compare in their sampling performance. Quantitative comparisons of species richness between acoustic recorders and human point counts in bird surveys have previously been hampered by the differing and often unknown detection ranges or sound detection spaces among sampling methods. We performed two meta-analyses based on 28 studies where bird point counts were paired with sound recordings at the same sampling sites. We compared alpha and gamma richness estimated by both survey methods after equalizing their effective detection ranges. We further assessed the influence of technical sound recording specifications (microphone signal-to-noise ratio, height and number) on the bird sampling performance of sound recorders compared to unlimited radius point counts. We show that after standardizing detection ranges, alpha and gamma richness from both methods are statistically indistinguishable, while there might be an avoidance effect in point counts. Furthermore, we show that microphone signal-to-noise ratio (a measure of its quality), height and number positively affect performance through increasing the detection range, allowing sound recorders to match the performance of human point counts. Synthesis and applications. We demonstrate that when used properly, high-end sound recording systems can sample terrestrial wildlife just as well as human observers conducting point counts. Correspondingly, we suggest a first standard methodology for sampling birds with autonomous sound recorders to obtain results comparable to point counts and enable practical sampling. We also give recommendations for carrying out effective surveys and making the most out of autonomous sound recorders.

AB - Autonomous sound recording is a promising sampling method for birds and other vocalizing terrestrial wildlife. However, while there are clear advantages of passive acoustic monitoring methods over classical point counts conducted by humans, it has been difficult to quantitatively assess how they compare in their sampling performance. Quantitative comparisons of species richness between acoustic recorders and human point counts in bird surveys have previously been hampered by the differing and often unknown detection ranges or sound detection spaces among sampling methods. We performed two meta-analyses based on 28 studies where bird point counts were paired with sound recordings at the same sampling sites. We compared alpha and gamma richness estimated by both survey methods after equalizing their effective detection ranges. We further assessed the influence of technical sound recording specifications (microphone signal-to-noise ratio, height and number) on the bird sampling performance of sound recorders compared to unlimited radius point counts. We show that after standardizing detection ranges, alpha and gamma richness from both methods are statistically indistinguishable, while there might be an avoidance effect in point counts. Furthermore, we show that microphone signal-to-noise ratio (a measure of its quality), height and number positively affect performance through increasing the detection range, allowing sound recorders to match the performance of human point counts. Synthesis and applications. We demonstrate that when used properly, high-end sound recording systems can sample terrestrial wildlife just as well as human observers conducting point counts. Correspondingly, we suggest a first standard methodology for sampling birds with autonomous sound recorders to obtain results comparable to point counts and enable practical sampling. We also give recommendations for carrying out effective surveys and making the most out of autonomous sound recorders.

KW - Autonomous sound recorder

KW - Bird survey

KW - Passive acoustic monitoring

KW - Point count

KW - Sampling methods

KW - Signal-to-noise ratio

KW - Sound detection space

KW - Species richness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050504552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050504552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13229

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13229

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050504552

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

ER -