Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators: an altmetric analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines

Pei Shan Chi, Juan Gorraiz, W. Glänzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we extend the perspective of the scholarly impact from the traditional citations to other forms of scientific communication among scholars in the mirror of the PlumX and Web of Science (WoS) data. There are in total eight indicators out of three categories including Captures, Citations, and Usage analysed in the study. The results of this study shows that Captures and Usage indicators measure very different aspects of research impact, although both of them show some similarity from the perspective of citations. The Characteristic Scores and Scales method was applied to different types of altmetric indicators for the first time and its robustness of the method was proved again.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScientometrics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Mirrors
chemistry
Communication
impact research
communication
science

Keywords

  • Altmetrics
  • Characteristic scores and scales
  • Citations
  • PlumX metrics
  • WoS usage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators : an altmetric analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines. / Chi, Pei Shan; Gorraiz, Juan; Glänzel, W.

In: Scientometrics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e0d37bd51de4416a563c942eb7167b8,
title = "Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators: an altmetric analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines",
abstract = "In this paper we extend the perspective of the scholarly impact from the traditional citations to other forms of scientific communication among scholars in the mirror of the PlumX and Web of Science (WoS) data. There are in total eight indicators out of three categories including Captures, Citations, and Usage analysed in the study. The results of this study shows that Captures and Usage indicators measure very different aspects of research impact, although both of them show some similarity from the perspective of citations. The Characteristic Scores and Scales method was applied to different types of altmetric indicators for the first time and its robustness of the method was proved again.",
keywords = "Altmetrics, Characteristic scores and scales, Citations, PlumX metrics, WoS usage",
author = "Chi, {Pei Shan} and Juan Gorraiz and W. Gl{\"a}nzel",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-019-03168-y",
language = "English",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators

T2 - an altmetric analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines

AU - Chi, Pei Shan

AU - Gorraiz, Juan

AU - Glänzel, W.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In this paper we extend the perspective of the scholarly impact from the traditional citations to other forms of scientific communication among scholars in the mirror of the PlumX and Web of Science (WoS) data. There are in total eight indicators out of three categories including Captures, Citations, and Usage analysed in the study. The results of this study shows that Captures and Usage indicators measure very different aspects of research impact, although both of them show some similarity from the perspective of citations. The Characteristic Scores and Scales method was applied to different types of altmetric indicators for the first time and its robustness of the method was proved again.

AB - In this paper we extend the perspective of the scholarly impact from the traditional citations to other forms of scientific communication among scholars in the mirror of the PlumX and Web of Science (WoS) data. There are in total eight indicators out of three categories including Captures, Citations, and Usage analysed in the study. The results of this study shows that Captures and Usage indicators measure very different aspects of research impact, although both of them show some similarity from the perspective of citations. The Characteristic Scores and Scales method was applied to different types of altmetric indicators for the first time and its robustness of the method was proved again.

KW - Altmetrics

KW - Characteristic scores and scales

KW - Citations

KW - PlumX metrics

KW - WoS usage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068816570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068816570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-019-03168-y

DO - 10.1007/s11192-019-03168-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068816570

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

ER -