Comparative evaluation of manual and instrumental rectum resections

I. Köves, P. Ronay, I. Besznyak, I. Vamosi-Nagy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors compared the perioperative results of 125 + 125 Dixon operations performed at two time intervals 1956-1979 and 1985-1990), the postoperative recurrences and the survival data. It is established that from the anastomosis point of view the instrumental resections- beside their rapidity and favourable sterility - are safer interventions associated with less complications. With respect to local recurrences the two methods do not differ significantly. A further advantage of the double stapling is that a larger number of patients can undergo a sphincter-saving resection and a lower lying anastomosis can be performed than with hand-sewn sutures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-631
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume19
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Rectum
Recurrence
Infertility
Sutures
Hand
Survival

Keywords

  • Manual and instrumental anastomosis
  • Rectum tumour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparative evaluation of manual and instrumental rectum resections. / Köves, I.; Ronay, P.; Besznyak, I.; Vamosi-Nagy, I.

In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1993, p. 625-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Köves, I, Ronay, P, Besznyak, I & Vamosi-Nagy, I 1993, 'Comparative evaluation of manual and instrumental rectum resections', European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 625-631.
Köves, I. ; Ronay, P. ; Besznyak, I. ; Vamosi-Nagy, I. / Comparative evaluation of manual and instrumental rectum resections. In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 1993 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 625-631.
@article{0858e0d47ac149d89a9cc7c9b9dba433,
title = "Comparative evaluation of manual and instrumental rectum resections",
abstract = "The authors compared the perioperative results of 125 + 125 Dixon operations performed at two time intervals 1956-1979 and 1985-1990), the postoperative recurrences and the survival data. It is established that from the anastomosis point of view the instrumental resections- beside their rapidity and favourable sterility - are safer interventions associated with less complications. With respect to local recurrences the two methods do not differ significantly. A further advantage of the double stapling is that a larger number of patients can undergo a sphincter-saving resection and a lower lying anastomosis can be performed than with hand-sewn sutures.",
keywords = "Manual and instrumental anastomosis, Rectum tumour",
author = "I. K{\"o}ves and P. Ronay and I. Besznyak and I. Vamosi-Nagy",
year = "1993",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "625--631",
journal = "European Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0748-7983",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of manual and instrumental rectum resections

AU - Köves, I.

AU - Ronay, P.

AU - Besznyak, I.

AU - Vamosi-Nagy, I.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The authors compared the perioperative results of 125 + 125 Dixon operations performed at two time intervals 1956-1979 and 1985-1990), the postoperative recurrences and the survival data. It is established that from the anastomosis point of view the instrumental resections- beside their rapidity and favourable sterility - are safer interventions associated with less complications. With respect to local recurrences the two methods do not differ significantly. A further advantage of the double stapling is that a larger number of patients can undergo a sphincter-saving resection and a lower lying anastomosis can be performed than with hand-sewn sutures.

AB - The authors compared the perioperative results of 125 + 125 Dixon operations performed at two time intervals 1956-1979 and 1985-1990), the postoperative recurrences and the survival data. It is established that from the anastomosis point of view the instrumental resections- beside their rapidity and favourable sterility - are safer interventions associated with less complications. With respect to local recurrences the two methods do not differ significantly. A further advantage of the double stapling is that a larger number of patients can undergo a sphincter-saving resection and a lower lying anastomosis can be performed than with hand-sewn sutures.

KW - Manual and instrumental anastomosis

KW - Rectum tumour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027716041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027716041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8270055

AN - SCOPUS:0027716041

VL - 19

SP - 625

EP - 631

JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0748-7983

IS - 6

ER -