Channel theory fails for the apparent contrast of flashed images

J. Fiser, P. J. Bex, W. L. Makous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Main point: Threshold experiments have led to the view that visual information passes through channels selective to orientation, spatial frequency, and spatial location. We present here observations that are difficult to understand in that view. Reasoning: As the duration of a flashed grating increases, its contrast threshold decreases and its apparent contrast increases, putatively reflecting the growth of excitation in the channels sensitive to the grating. Shifting the orientation of the grating by 90í in the middle of that growth should allow excitation to decay in the previously excited channels and to rise anew in channels sensitive to the new orientation. At any given time, the excitation should lag behind the levels it would have reached if the grating's orientation had not changed (unless excitation is asymptotic). The shift should raise contrast thresholds and lower apparent contrast. We show that this is true for thresholds, but not true for the apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings. We observe the same pattern of results when the phase of the grating is shifted by 180í, and when two different random noise patterns or two different natural images are exchanged during this period of growing excitation (thereby changing the spatial distribution of energy, the phase spectrum, and, to some extent, the energy distribution in 2D Fourier space). Conclusions: (1) growth of apparent contrast, but not contrast threshold, is independent of changes of orientation, phase, and spatial distribution during short presentations; (2) the concept of channels complicates explanation of these particular suprathreshold phenomena and gives impetus to the search a different conceptual model.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Channel theory fails for the apparent contrast of flashed images. / Fiser, J.; Bex, P. J.; Makous, W. L.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fiser, J. ; Bex, P. J. ; Makous, W. L. / Channel theory fails for the apparent contrast of flashed images. In: Journal of Vision. 2001 ; Vol. 1, No. 3.
@article{940e11517f104d2f9c0523e4d8bd7cdb,
title = "Channel theory fails for the apparent contrast of flashed images",
abstract = "Main point: Threshold experiments have led to the view that visual information passes through channels selective to orientation, spatial frequency, and spatial location. We present here observations that are difficult to understand in that view. Reasoning: As the duration of a flashed grating increases, its contrast threshold decreases and its apparent contrast increases, putatively reflecting the growth of excitation in the channels sensitive to the grating. Shifting the orientation of the grating by 90{\'i} in the middle of that growth should allow excitation to decay in the previously excited channels and to rise anew in channels sensitive to the new orientation. At any given time, the excitation should lag behind the levels it would have reached if the grating's orientation had not changed (unless excitation is asymptotic). The shift should raise contrast thresholds and lower apparent contrast. We show that this is true for thresholds, but not true for the apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings. We observe the same pattern of results when the phase of the grating is shifted by 180{\'i}, and when two different random noise patterns or two different natural images are exchanged during this period of growing excitation (thereby changing the spatial distribution of energy, the phase spectrum, and, to some extent, the energy distribution in 2D Fourier space). Conclusions: (1) growth of apparent contrast, but not contrast threshold, is independent of changes of orientation, phase, and spatial distribution during short presentations; (2) the concept of channels complicates explanation of these particular suprathreshold phenomena and gives impetus to the search a different conceptual model.",
author = "J. Fiser and Bex, {P. J.} and Makous, {W. L.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1167/1.3.442",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Channel theory fails for the apparent contrast of flashed images

AU - Fiser, J.

AU - Bex, P. J.

AU - Makous, W. L.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Main point: Threshold experiments have led to the view that visual information passes through channels selective to orientation, spatial frequency, and spatial location. We present here observations that are difficult to understand in that view. Reasoning: As the duration of a flashed grating increases, its contrast threshold decreases and its apparent contrast increases, putatively reflecting the growth of excitation in the channels sensitive to the grating. Shifting the orientation of the grating by 90í in the middle of that growth should allow excitation to decay in the previously excited channels and to rise anew in channels sensitive to the new orientation. At any given time, the excitation should lag behind the levels it would have reached if the grating's orientation had not changed (unless excitation is asymptotic). The shift should raise contrast thresholds and lower apparent contrast. We show that this is true for thresholds, but not true for the apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings. We observe the same pattern of results when the phase of the grating is shifted by 180í, and when two different random noise patterns or two different natural images are exchanged during this period of growing excitation (thereby changing the spatial distribution of energy, the phase spectrum, and, to some extent, the energy distribution in 2D Fourier space). Conclusions: (1) growth of apparent contrast, but not contrast threshold, is independent of changes of orientation, phase, and spatial distribution during short presentations; (2) the concept of channels complicates explanation of these particular suprathreshold phenomena and gives impetus to the search a different conceptual model.

AB - Main point: Threshold experiments have led to the view that visual information passes through channels selective to orientation, spatial frequency, and spatial location. We present here observations that are difficult to understand in that view. Reasoning: As the duration of a flashed grating increases, its contrast threshold decreases and its apparent contrast increases, putatively reflecting the growth of excitation in the channels sensitive to the grating. Shifting the orientation of the grating by 90í in the middle of that growth should allow excitation to decay in the previously excited channels and to rise anew in channels sensitive to the new orientation. At any given time, the excitation should lag behind the levels it would have reached if the grating's orientation had not changed (unless excitation is asymptotic). The shift should raise contrast thresholds and lower apparent contrast. We show that this is true for thresholds, but not true for the apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings. We observe the same pattern of results when the phase of the grating is shifted by 180í, and when two different random noise patterns or two different natural images are exchanged during this period of growing excitation (thereby changing the spatial distribution of energy, the phase spectrum, and, to some extent, the energy distribution in 2D Fourier space). Conclusions: (1) growth of apparent contrast, but not contrast threshold, is independent of changes of orientation, phase, and spatial distribution during short presentations; (2) the concept of channels complicates explanation of these particular suprathreshold phenomena and gives impetus to the search a different conceptual model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143100351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143100351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/1.3.442

DO - 10.1167/1.3.442

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 3

ER -