Capsaicin differentially influences somatosensory cortical responses evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation

J. Toldi, F. Joo, J. R. Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of capsaicin injected intraperitoneally (200 μg/kg) or applied locally to the cortical surface (10-5 M) were studied on cortical potentials evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation. Capsaicin treatment (i.p.) differentially influenced the cortical evoked potentials depending on the type of stimulation. Just after both types of capsaicin application, the responses to both kinds of stimuli decreased in amplitude. Additionally, during this time a short fall in blood pressure was observed. Half an hour later, however, only in the case of interperitoneal application the potentials evoked by electrical stimulation were facilitated, while the potentials evoked by vibrissa deflection had recovered and stayed around the control levels thereafter. In addition, the responsive cortex area activated by electrical stimulation became enlarged after the i.p. injection of capsaicin, while that of the cortex region activated by mechanical stimulation did not change significantly. Capsaicin applied locally to the cortex resulted neither in the facilitation of evoked potentials nor in the enlargement of the responsive cortical area. The present findings are the first to demonstrate that the i.p. (but not local) administration of capsaicin, in low dosage, differentially influences the cortical responses evoked by electrical and mechanical stimulation of somatosensory afferents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-139
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroscience
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Capsaicin
Evoked Potentials
Electric Stimulation
Vibrissae
Blood Pressure
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Capsaicin differentially influences somatosensory cortical responses evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation. / Toldi, J.; Joo, F.; Wolfe, J. R.

In: Neuroscience, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1992, p. 135-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{706588517e6e413a80805d4d88fbdc49,
title = "Capsaicin differentially influences somatosensory cortical responses evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation",
abstract = "The effects of capsaicin injected intraperitoneally (200 μg/kg) or applied locally to the cortical surface (10-5 M) were studied on cortical potentials evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation. Capsaicin treatment (i.p.) differentially influenced the cortical evoked potentials depending on the type of stimulation. Just after both types of capsaicin application, the responses to both kinds of stimuli decreased in amplitude. Additionally, during this time a short fall in blood pressure was observed. Half an hour later, however, only in the case of interperitoneal application the potentials evoked by electrical stimulation were facilitated, while the potentials evoked by vibrissa deflection had recovered and stayed around the control levels thereafter. In addition, the responsive cortex area activated by electrical stimulation became enlarged after the i.p. injection of capsaicin, while that of the cortex region activated by mechanical stimulation did not change significantly. Capsaicin applied locally to the cortex resulted neither in the facilitation of evoked potentials nor in the enlargement of the responsive cortical area. The present findings are the first to demonstrate that the i.p. (but not local) administration of capsaicin, in low dosage, differentially influences the cortical responses evoked by electrical and mechanical stimulation of somatosensory afferents.",
author = "J. Toldi and F. Joo and Wolfe, {J. R.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0306-4522(92)90081-C",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "135--139",
journal = "Neuroscience",
issn = "0306-4522",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capsaicin differentially influences somatosensory cortical responses evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation

AU - Toldi, J.

AU - Joo, F.

AU - Wolfe, J. R.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The effects of capsaicin injected intraperitoneally (200 μg/kg) or applied locally to the cortical surface (10-5 M) were studied on cortical potentials evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation. Capsaicin treatment (i.p.) differentially influenced the cortical evoked potentials depending on the type of stimulation. Just after both types of capsaicin application, the responses to both kinds of stimuli decreased in amplitude. Additionally, during this time a short fall in blood pressure was observed. Half an hour later, however, only in the case of interperitoneal application the potentials evoked by electrical stimulation were facilitated, while the potentials evoked by vibrissa deflection had recovered and stayed around the control levels thereafter. In addition, the responsive cortex area activated by electrical stimulation became enlarged after the i.p. injection of capsaicin, while that of the cortex region activated by mechanical stimulation did not change significantly. Capsaicin applied locally to the cortex resulted neither in the facilitation of evoked potentials nor in the enlargement of the responsive cortical area. The present findings are the first to demonstrate that the i.p. (but not local) administration of capsaicin, in low dosage, differentially influences the cortical responses evoked by electrical and mechanical stimulation of somatosensory afferents.

AB - The effects of capsaicin injected intraperitoneally (200 μg/kg) or applied locally to the cortical surface (10-5 M) were studied on cortical potentials evoked by peripheral electrical or mechanical stimulation. Capsaicin treatment (i.p.) differentially influenced the cortical evoked potentials depending on the type of stimulation. Just after both types of capsaicin application, the responses to both kinds of stimuli decreased in amplitude. Additionally, during this time a short fall in blood pressure was observed. Half an hour later, however, only in the case of interperitoneal application the potentials evoked by electrical stimulation were facilitated, while the potentials evoked by vibrissa deflection had recovered and stayed around the control levels thereafter. In addition, the responsive cortex area activated by electrical stimulation became enlarged after the i.p. injection of capsaicin, while that of the cortex region activated by mechanical stimulation did not change significantly. Capsaicin applied locally to the cortex resulted neither in the facilitation of evoked potentials nor in the enlargement of the responsive cortical area. The present findings are the first to demonstrate that the i.p. (but not local) administration of capsaicin, in low dosage, differentially influences the cortical responses evoked by electrical and mechanical stimulation of somatosensory afferents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026633003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026633003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90081-C

DO - 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90081-C

M3 - Article

C2 - 1407542

AN - SCOPUS:0026633003

VL - 49

SP - 135

EP - 139

JO - Neuroscience

JF - Neuroscience

SN - 0306-4522

IS - 1

ER -