beyond the myths about work addiction: Toward a consensus on definition and trajectories for future studies on problematic overworking

Paweł A. Atroszko, Zsolt Demetrovics, Mark D. Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an unprecedented collaborative effort to integrate the existing knowledge on work addiction and delineate trajectories for future studies, several papers from work addiction researchers (including some of the most prolific experts in the field) have contributed to the debate on the misconceptions/myths about this problematic behavior. On the basis of the overview of the presented arguments, the most commonly proposed recommendations were that there should be: (a) a general definition of work addiction, (b) the need for more transdisciplinary and integrative approach to research, and (c) propositions regarding more high-quality research. These three aspects are summarized in the present paper. There is a general agreement among work addiction researchers that work addiction is a problematic behavior that merits more systematic studies, which require input and expertise from a wide range of fields due to its complex nature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-15
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of behavioral addictions
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Behavioral addiction
  • Problematic overworking
  • Problematic work
  • Work addiction
  • Workaholism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'beyond the myths about work addiction: Toward a consensus on definition and trajectories for future studies on problematic overworking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this