Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas

Xiaojie Chen, A. Szolnoki, Matjaž Perc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Free-riding on a joint venture bears the risk of losing personal endowment as the group may fail to reach the collective target due to insufficient contributions. A collective-risk social dilemma emerges, which we here study in the realm of the spatial public goods game with group-performance-dependent risk levels. Instead of using an overall fixed value, we update the risk level in each group based on the difference between the actual contributions and the declared target. A single parameter interpolates between a step-like risk function and virtual irrelevance of the group's performance in averting the failure, thus bridging the two extremes constituting maximal and minimal feedback. We show that stronger feedback between group performance and risk level is in general more favorable for the successful evolution of public cooperation, yet only if the collective target to be reached is moderate. Paradoxically, if the goals are overambitious, intermediate feedback strengths yield optimal conditions for cooperation. This can be explained by the propagation of players that employ identical strategies but experience different individual success while trying to cope with the collective-risk social dilemma.

Original languageEnglish
Article number68003
JournalEPL
Volume99
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

games
yield strength
bears
propagation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas. / Chen, Xiaojie; Szolnoki, A.; Perc, Matjaž.

In: EPL, Vol. 99, No. 6, 68003, 09.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Xiaojie ; Szolnoki, A. ; Perc, Matjaž. / Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas. In: EPL. 2012 ; Vol. 99, No. 6.
@article{f1ad9e23ae1840ef920e407cf0af94f4,
title = "Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas",
abstract = "Free-riding on a joint venture bears the risk of losing personal endowment as the group may fail to reach the collective target due to insufficient contributions. A collective-risk social dilemma emerges, which we here study in the realm of the spatial public goods game with group-performance-dependent risk levels. Instead of using an overall fixed value, we update the risk level in each group based on the difference between the actual contributions and the declared target. A single parameter interpolates between a step-like risk function and virtual irrelevance of the group's performance in averting the failure, thus bridging the two extremes constituting maximal and minimal feedback. We show that stronger feedback between group performance and risk level is in general more favorable for the successful evolution of public cooperation, yet only if the collective target to be reached is moderate. Paradoxically, if the goals are overambitious, intermediate feedback strengths yield optimal conditions for cooperation. This can be explained by the propagation of players that employ identical strategies but experience different individual success while trying to cope with the collective-risk social dilemma.",
author = "Xiaojie Chen and A. Szolnoki and Matjaž Perc",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1209/0295-5075/99/68003",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
journal = "Europhysics Letters",
issn = "0295-5075",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas

AU - Chen, Xiaojie

AU - Szolnoki, A.

AU - Perc, Matjaž

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Free-riding on a joint venture bears the risk of losing personal endowment as the group may fail to reach the collective target due to insufficient contributions. A collective-risk social dilemma emerges, which we here study in the realm of the spatial public goods game with group-performance-dependent risk levels. Instead of using an overall fixed value, we update the risk level in each group based on the difference between the actual contributions and the declared target. A single parameter interpolates between a step-like risk function and virtual irrelevance of the group's performance in averting the failure, thus bridging the two extremes constituting maximal and minimal feedback. We show that stronger feedback between group performance and risk level is in general more favorable for the successful evolution of public cooperation, yet only if the collective target to be reached is moderate. Paradoxically, if the goals are overambitious, intermediate feedback strengths yield optimal conditions for cooperation. This can be explained by the propagation of players that employ identical strategies but experience different individual success while trying to cope with the collective-risk social dilemma.

AB - Free-riding on a joint venture bears the risk of losing personal endowment as the group may fail to reach the collective target due to insufficient contributions. A collective-risk social dilemma emerges, which we here study in the realm of the spatial public goods game with group-performance-dependent risk levels. Instead of using an overall fixed value, we update the risk level in each group based on the difference between the actual contributions and the declared target. A single parameter interpolates between a step-like risk function and virtual irrelevance of the group's performance in averting the failure, thus bridging the two extremes constituting maximal and minimal feedback. We show that stronger feedback between group performance and risk level is in general more favorable for the successful evolution of public cooperation, yet only if the collective target to be reached is moderate. Paradoxically, if the goals are overambitious, intermediate feedback strengths yield optimal conditions for cooperation. This can be explained by the propagation of players that employ identical strategies but experience different individual success while trying to cope with the collective-risk social dilemma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867532164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867532164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1209/0295-5075/99/68003

DO - 10.1209/0295-5075/99/68003

M3 - Article

VL - 99

JO - Europhysics Letters

JF - Europhysics Letters

SN - 0295-5075

IS - 6

M1 - 68003

ER -