Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD

Gérald Devuyst, Georges A. Darbellay, J. M. Vesin, V. Kemény, M. Ritter, D. W. Droste, C. Molina, J. Serena, R. Sztajzel, P. Ruchat, C. Lucchesi, G. Dietler, E. B. Ringelstein, P. A. Despland, J. Bogousslavsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose - Transcranial Doppler (TCD) can detect high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in the cerebral circulation. HITS may correspond to artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli. The aim of this study was to develop an offline automated Doppler system allowing the classification of HITS. Methods - We studied 600 HITS in vivo, including 200 artifacts from normal subjects, 200 solid emboli from patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis, and 200 gaseous emboli in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale. The study was 2-fold, each part involving 300 HITS (100 of each type). The first 300 HITS (learning set) were used to construct an automated classification algorithm. The remaining 300 HITS (validation set) were used to check the validity of this algorithm. To classify HITS, we combined dual-gate TCD with a wavelet representation and compared it with the current "gold standard," the human experts. Results - A combination of the peak frequency of HITS and the time delay makes it possible to separate artifacts from emboli. On the validation set, we achieved a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. To distinguish between solid and gaseous emboli, where positive refers now to the solid emboli, we used the peak frequency, the relative power, and the envelope symmetry of HITS. On the validation set, we achieved a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 86%, a conditional PPV of 89%, and a conditional NPV of 89%. Conclusions - An automated wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD can reliably reject artifacts from emboli. From a clinical standpoint, however, this approach has only a fair accuracy in differentiating between solid and gaseous emboli.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2803-2809
Number of pages7
JournalStroke
Volume32
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2001

Keywords

  • Automated system
  • Dual-gate TCD
  • HITS
  • Solid/gaseous emboli
  • Wavelets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialised Nursing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Devuyst, G., Darbellay, G. A., Vesin, J. M., Kemény, V., Ritter, M., Droste, D. W., Molina, C., Serena, J., Sztajzel, R., Ruchat, P., Lucchesi, C., Dietler, G., Ringelstein, E. B., Despland, P. A., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2001). Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD. Stroke, 32(12), 2803-2809. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs1201.099714