Association of previous abdominal surgery and significant adhesions in laparoscopic sterilization patients

I. Szigetvari, M. Feinman, D. Barad, G. Bártfai, S. G. Kaali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many surgeons believe that women who have undergone laparotomy are not good candidates for laparoscopic sterilization. Many of those women are admitted for minilaparotomy. However, women without previous surgery can also have adhesions. We compared the incidence of significant adhesions in women with and without histories of abdominal surgery. We also examined the outcomes in each group after 955 laparoscopic sterilizations. Two hundred sixty-three women (28%) had had previous surgery. Of them, 61 (23%) displayed significant adhesions. Of the remaining 692 patients, 19 (2.7%) had significant adhesions. There were no major complications in either group. Thus, a history of previous abdominal or pelvic procedures increased the risk of significant adhesion formation nearly tenfold. Since no major complications occurred in those women, we conclude that while such patients are at increased risk, that risk is not inordinate and does not justify the routine use of minilaparotomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-466
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume34
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Laparotomy
Incidence
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Association of previous abdominal surgery and significant adhesions in laparoscopic sterilization patients. / Szigetvari, I.; Feinman, M.; Barad, D.; Bártfai, G.; Kaali, S. G.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 34, No. 7, 1989, p. 465-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ffcb129e98140d7b3cf31cf11400b0a,
title = "Association of previous abdominal surgery and significant adhesions in laparoscopic sterilization patients",
abstract = "Many surgeons believe that women who have undergone laparotomy are not good candidates for laparoscopic sterilization. Many of those women are admitted for minilaparotomy. However, women without previous surgery can also have adhesions. We compared the incidence of significant adhesions in women with and without histories of abdominal surgery. We also examined the outcomes in each group after 955 laparoscopic sterilizations. Two hundred sixty-three women (28{\%}) had had previous surgery. Of them, 61 (23{\%}) displayed significant adhesions. Of the remaining 692 patients, 19 (2.7{\%}) had significant adhesions. There were no major complications in either group. Thus, a history of previous abdominal or pelvic procedures increased the risk of significant adhesion formation nearly tenfold. Since no major complications occurred in those women, we conclude that while such patients are at increased risk, that risk is not inordinate and does not justify the routine use of minilaparotomy.",
author = "I. Szigetvari and M. Feinman and D. Barad and G. B{\'a}rtfai and Kaali, {S. G.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "465--466",
journal = "The Journal of reproductive medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of previous abdominal surgery and significant adhesions in laparoscopic sterilization patients

AU - Szigetvari, I.

AU - Feinman, M.

AU - Barad, D.

AU - Bártfai, G.

AU - Kaali, S. G.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Many surgeons believe that women who have undergone laparotomy are not good candidates for laparoscopic sterilization. Many of those women are admitted for minilaparotomy. However, women without previous surgery can also have adhesions. We compared the incidence of significant adhesions in women with and without histories of abdominal surgery. We also examined the outcomes in each group after 955 laparoscopic sterilizations. Two hundred sixty-three women (28%) had had previous surgery. Of them, 61 (23%) displayed significant adhesions. Of the remaining 692 patients, 19 (2.7%) had significant adhesions. There were no major complications in either group. Thus, a history of previous abdominal or pelvic procedures increased the risk of significant adhesion formation nearly tenfold. Since no major complications occurred in those women, we conclude that while such patients are at increased risk, that risk is not inordinate and does not justify the routine use of minilaparotomy.

AB - Many surgeons believe that women who have undergone laparotomy are not good candidates for laparoscopic sterilization. Many of those women are admitted for minilaparotomy. However, women without previous surgery can also have adhesions. We compared the incidence of significant adhesions in women with and without histories of abdominal surgery. We also examined the outcomes in each group after 955 laparoscopic sterilizations. Two hundred sixty-three women (28%) had had previous surgery. Of them, 61 (23%) displayed significant adhesions. Of the remaining 692 patients, 19 (2.7%) had significant adhesions. There were no major complications in either group. Thus, a history of previous abdominal or pelvic procedures increased the risk of significant adhesion formation nearly tenfold. Since no major complications occurred in those women, we conclude that while such patients are at increased risk, that risk is not inordinate and does not justify the routine use of minilaparotomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024393238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024393238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 465

EP - 466

JO - The Journal of reproductive medicine

JF - The Journal of reproductive medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 7

ER -