Approaches to comprehensive multidimensional liquid chromatography systems

Jacob N. Fairchild, K. Horváth, Georges Guiochon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This work compares the performance of the three different schemes implementing two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) in terms of the peak capacity that they can generate and of the time that they need to complete a two-dimensional analysis. We discuss in detail how time is spent in these two-dimensional liquid chromatography × liquid chromatography (LC × LC) schemes and how to compare them. Keeping constant the characteristics of the first-dimension separation, we systematically varied those of the second-dimension separation and of its coupling to the first-dimension. In the process, five systems were created, based on the principles of the three known implementations of comprehensive 2D-LC. This work demonstrates an original method for the selection of the best comprehensive 2D-LC approach, depending on the desired peak capacity and on time constraints. The decision to use a 2D-LC method arises from the need to achieve a given resolution (i.e., a target peak capacity) within as short a time as possible or to reach the highest possible resolution in a given analysis time. Using the most appropriate schemes, we suggest how it is realistically possible to generate peak capacities ranging from 266 in just over 20 min or about 2800 in 2.3 h. When the time available for a two-dimensional separation is very short and the desired peak capacity cannot be achieved in 1D-LC, an on-line 2D-LC approach is unquestionably best. However, if a longer analysis time is acceptable, a 10-fold increase in the peak capacity can be obtained at the cost of a mere 7-fold increase in total analysis time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1363-1371
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Chromatography A
Volume1216
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 27 2009

Fingerprint

Liquid chromatography
Liquid Chromatography

Keywords

  • Analysis time
  • Off-line 2D-LC
  • On-line 2D-LC
  • Optimization
  • Peak capacity
  • Stop-and-go 2D-LC
  • Two-dimensional chromatography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Approaches to comprehensive multidimensional liquid chromatography systems. / Fairchild, Jacob N.; Horváth, K.; Guiochon, Georges.

In: Journal of Chromatography A, Vol. 1216, No. 9, 27.02.2009, p. 1363-1371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fairchild, Jacob N. ; Horváth, K. ; Guiochon, Georges. / Approaches to comprehensive multidimensional liquid chromatography systems. In: Journal of Chromatography A. 2009 ; Vol. 1216, No. 9. pp. 1363-1371.
@article{090c1ffd12c04000a6dcfc2c64ad8d8e,
title = "Approaches to comprehensive multidimensional liquid chromatography systems",
abstract = "This work compares the performance of the three different schemes implementing two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) in terms of the peak capacity that they can generate and of the time that they need to complete a two-dimensional analysis. We discuss in detail how time is spent in these two-dimensional liquid chromatography × liquid chromatography (LC × LC) schemes and how to compare them. Keeping constant the characteristics of the first-dimension separation, we systematically varied those of the second-dimension separation and of its coupling to the first-dimension. In the process, five systems were created, based on the principles of the three known implementations of comprehensive 2D-LC. This work demonstrates an original method for the selection of the best comprehensive 2D-LC approach, depending on the desired peak capacity and on time constraints. The decision to use a 2D-LC method arises from the need to achieve a given resolution (i.e., a target peak capacity) within as short a time as possible or to reach the highest possible resolution in a given analysis time. Using the most appropriate schemes, we suggest how it is realistically possible to generate peak capacities ranging from 266 in just over 20 min or about 2800 in 2.3 h. When the time available for a two-dimensional separation is very short and the desired peak capacity cannot be achieved in 1D-LC, an on-line 2D-LC approach is unquestionably best. However, if a longer analysis time is acceptable, a 10-fold increase in the peak capacity can be obtained at the cost of a mere 7-fold increase in total analysis time.",
keywords = "Analysis time, Off-line 2D-LC, On-line 2D-LC, Optimization, Peak capacity, Stop-and-go 2D-LC, Two-dimensional chromatography",
author = "Fairchild, {Jacob N.} and K. Horv{\'a}th and Georges Guiochon",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/j.chroma.2008.12.073",
language = "English",
volume = "1216",
pages = "1363--1371",
journal = "Journal of Chromatography",
issn = "0021-9673",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to comprehensive multidimensional liquid chromatography systems

AU - Fairchild, Jacob N.

AU - Horváth, K.

AU - Guiochon, Georges

PY - 2009/2/27

Y1 - 2009/2/27

N2 - This work compares the performance of the three different schemes implementing two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) in terms of the peak capacity that they can generate and of the time that they need to complete a two-dimensional analysis. We discuss in detail how time is spent in these two-dimensional liquid chromatography × liquid chromatography (LC × LC) schemes and how to compare them. Keeping constant the characteristics of the first-dimension separation, we systematically varied those of the second-dimension separation and of its coupling to the first-dimension. In the process, five systems were created, based on the principles of the three known implementations of comprehensive 2D-LC. This work demonstrates an original method for the selection of the best comprehensive 2D-LC approach, depending on the desired peak capacity and on time constraints. The decision to use a 2D-LC method arises from the need to achieve a given resolution (i.e., a target peak capacity) within as short a time as possible or to reach the highest possible resolution in a given analysis time. Using the most appropriate schemes, we suggest how it is realistically possible to generate peak capacities ranging from 266 in just over 20 min or about 2800 in 2.3 h. When the time available for a two-dimensional separation is very short and the desired peak capacity cannot be achieved in 1D-LC, an on-line 2D-LC approach is unquestionably best. However, if a longer analysis time is acceptable, a 10-fold increase in the peak capacity can be obtained at the cost of a mere 7-fold increase in total analysis time.

AB - This work compares the performance of the three different schemes implementing two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) in terms of the peak capacity that they can generate and of the time that they need to complete a two-dimensional analysis. We discuss in detail how time is spent in these two-dimensional liquid chromatography × liquid chromatography (LC × LC) schemes and how to compare them. Keeping constant the characteristics of the first-dimension separation, we systematically varied those of the second-dimension separation and of its coupling to the first-dimension. In the process, five systems were created, based on the principles of the three known implementations of comprehensive 2D-LC. This work demonstrates an original method for the selection of the best comprehensive 2D-LC approach, depending on the desired peak capacity and on time constraints. The decision to use a 2D-LC method arises from the need to achieve a given resolution (i.e., a target peak capacity) within as short a time as possible or to reach the highest possible resolution in a given analysis time. Using the most appropriate schemes, we suggest how it is realistically possible to generate peak capacities ranging from 266 in just over 20 min or about 2800 in 2.3 h. When the time available for a two-dimensional separation is very short and the desired peak capacity cannot be achieved in 1D-LC, an on-line 2D-LC approach is unquestionably best. However, if a longer analysis time is acceptable, a 10-fold increase in the peak capacity can be obtained at the cost of a mere 7-fold increase in total analysis time.

KW - Analysis time

KW - Off-line 2D-LC

KW - On-line 2D-LC

KW - Optimization

KW - Peak capacity

KW - Stop-and-go 2D-LC

KW - Two-dimensional chromatography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59049083444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59049083444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.12.073

DO - 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.12.073

M3 - Article

C2 - 19150720

AN - SCOPUS:59049083444

VL - 1216

SP - 1363

EP - 1371

JO - Journal of Chromatography

JF - Journal of Chromatography

SN - 0021-9673

IS - 9

ER -