Application of compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants in maxillofacial surgery

G. Szabó, J. Barabás, J. Mátral, J. György, L. Miklós

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a 4-year period, 40 compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants fixed with titanium plates and screws were used: 24 for the correction of mandibular defects, 9 for temporomandibular joint replacement, and 7 for augmentation of facial contour. During the 1 to 4 years following the operations, it was not necessary to remove any aluminum oxide joint or implant used for contour correction. In 5 of the 24 cases of mandibular reconstruction, however, it was necessary to remove the ceramic. In 3 cases, this was due to recurrence of the tumor, and in 2 cases the cause was dermal necrosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-361
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Aluminum Oxide
Oral Surgery
Ceramics
Replacement Arthroplasties
Mandibular Reconstruction
Temporomandibular Joint
Titanium
Necrosis
Joints
Recurrence
Skin
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Application of compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants in maxillofacial surgery. / Szabó, G.; Barabás, J.; Mátral, J.; György, J.; Miklós, L.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1990, p. 354-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Szabó, G. ; Barabás, J. ; Mátral, J. ; György, J. ; Miklós, L. / Application of compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants in maxillofacial surgery. In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1990 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 354-361.
@article{9ba8b7bd08e84796b23ec9fbee819f11,
title = "Application of compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants in maxillofacial surgery",
abstract = "In a 4-year period, 40 compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants fixed with titanium plates and screws were used: 24 for the correction of mandibular defects, 9 for temporomandibular joint replacement, and 7 for augmentation of facial contour. During the 1 to 4 years following the operations, it was not necessary to remove any aluminum oxide joint or implant used for contour correction. In 5 of the 24 cases of mandibular reconstruction, however, it was necessary to remove the ceramic. In 3 cases, this was due to recurrence of the tumor, and in 2 cases the cause was dermal necrosis.",
author = "G. Szab{\'o} and J. Barab{\'a}s and J. M{\'a}tral and J. Gy{\"o}rgy and L. Mikl{\'o}s",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0278-2391(90)90430-A",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "354--361",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants in maxillofacial surgery

AU - Szabó, G.

AU - Barabás, J.

AU - Mátral, J.

AU - György, J.

AU - Miklós, L.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - In a 4-year period, 40 compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants fixed with titanium plates and screws were used: 24 for the correction of mandibular defects, 9 for temporomandibular joint replacement, and 7 for augmentation of facial contour. During the 1 to 4 years following the operations, it was not necessary to remove any aluminum oxide joint or implant used for contour correction. In 5 of the 24 cases of mandibular reconstruction, however, it was necessary to remove the ceramic. In 3 cases, this was due to recurrence of the tumor, and in 2 cases the cause was dermal necrosis.

AB - In a 4-year period, 40 compact aluminum oxide ceramic implants fixed with titanium plates and screws were used: 24 for the correction of mandibular defects, 9 for temporomandibular joint replacement, and 7 for augmentation of facial contour. During the 1 to 4 years following the operations, it was not necessary to remove any aluminum oxide joint or implant used for contour correction. In 5 of the 24 cases of mandibular reconstruction, however, it was necessary to remove the ceramic. In 3 cases, this was due to recurrence of the tumor, and in 2 cases the cause was dermal necrosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025212256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025212256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90430-A

DO - 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90430-A

M3 - Article

C2 - 2179493

AN - SCOPUS:0025212256

VL - 48

SP - 354

EP - 361

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 4

ER -