An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness

Gemma P. Faulkner, B. Livingstone, L. Kirsty Pourshahidi, Michelle Spence, Moira Dean, Sinead O'Brien, Eileen R. Gibney, Julie M.W. Wallace, Tracy A. McCaffrey, Maeve A. Kerr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective This qualitative study aimed to investigate consumer opinions on the usefulness of portion size estimation aids (PSEA); consumer preferences in terms of format and context for use; and the level of detail of guidance considered necessary for the effective application of PSEA. Design Six focus groups (three to eight participants per group) were conducted to elicit views on PSEA. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by two independent researchers using a template approach. Setting The focus groups were conducted in 2013 by an experienced moderator in various sites across the island of Ireland (three in the Republic of Ireland and three in Northern Ireland) including local leisure, community and resource centres; the home environment; and a university meeting room. Participants General population, males (n = 17) and females (n = 15) aged 18–64 years old. Participants were recruited from both urban and rural locations representing a range of socio-economic groups. Results The majority of participants deemed the coloured portion pots and disposable plastic cup (household measures) to be useful particularly for the estimation of amorphous cereal products (e.g. breakfast cereals). Preferences were evident for “visual” PSEA (reference objects, household measures and food packaging) rather than ‘quantities and measures’ such as weighing in grams or ounces. Participants stated that PS education should be concise, consistent, from a reputable source, initiated at school age and communicated innovatively e.g. mobile app or TV advertisement. Guidance in relation to gender, age and activity level was favoured over a “one size fits all” approach. Conclusions This study identified consumer preferences and acceptance of “visual” PSEA such as portion pots/cups to estimate appropriate PS of amorphous grain foods such as breakfast cereals, pasta and rice. Concise information from a reputable source in relation to gender, age and activity level should accompany PSEA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-208
Number of pages9
JournalAppetite
Volume114
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Portion Size
Breakfast
Interpersonal Relations
Focus Groups
Ireland
Mobile Applications
Food Packaging
Northern Ireland
Leisure Activities
Islands
Plastics
Economics
Research Personnel
Education
Food
Population

Keywords

  • Consumer
  • Energy intake
  • Obesity
  • Portion size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Faulkner, G. P., Livingstone, B., Pourshahidi, L. K., Spence, M., Dean, M., O'Brien, S., ... Kerr, M. A. (2017). An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness. Appetite, 114, 200-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.027

An evaluation of portion size estimation aids : Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness. / Faulkner, Gemma P.; Livingstone, B.; Pourshahidi, L. Kirsty; Spence, Michelle; Dean, Moira; O'Brien, Sinead; Gibney, Eileen R.; Wallace, Julie M.W.; McCaffrey, Tracy A.; Kerr, Maeve A.

In: Appetite, Vol. 114, 01.07.2017, p. 200-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Faulkner, GP, Livingstone, B, Pourshahidi, LK, Spence, M, Dean, M, O'Brien, S, Gibney, ER, Wallace, JMW, McCaffrey, TA & Kerr, MA 2017, 'An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness', Appetite, vol. 114, pp. 200-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.027
Faulkner, Gemma P. ; Livingstone, B. ; Pourshahidi, L. Kirsty ; Spence, Michelle ; Dean, Moira ; O'Brien, Sinead ; Gibney, Eileen R. ; Wallace, Julie M.W. ; McCaffrey, Tracy A. ; Kerr, Maeve A. / An evaluation of portion size estimation aids : Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness. In: Appetite. 2017 ; Vol. 114. pp. 200-208.
@article{0609bc8d356544df999cb0d7e095fbc7,
title = "An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness",
abstract = "Objective This qualitative study aimed to investigate consumer opinions on the usefulness of portion size estimation aids (PSEA); consumer preferences in terms of format and context for use; and the level of detail of guidance considered necessary for the effective application of PSEA. Design Six focus groups (three to eight participants per group) were conducted to elicit views on PSEA. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by two independent researchers using a template approach. Setting The focus groups were conducted in 2013 by an experienced moderator in various sites across the island of Ireland (three in the Republic of Ireland and three in Northern Ireland) including local leisure, community and resource centres; the home environment; and a university meeting room. Participants General population, males (n = 17) and females (n = 15) aged 18–64 years old. Participants were recruited from both urban and rural locations representing a range of socio-economic groups. Results The majority of participants deemed the coloured portion pots and disposable plastic cup (household measures) to be useful particularly for the estimation of amorphous cereal products (e.g. breakfast cereals). Preferences were evident for “visual” PSEA (reference objects, household measures and food packaging) rather than ‘quantities and measures’ such as weighing in grams or ounces. Participants stated that PS education should be concise, consistent, from a reputable source, initiated at school age and communicated innovatively e.g. mobile app or TV advertisement. Guidance in relation to gender, age and activity level was favoured over a “one size fits all” approach. Conclusions This study identified consumer preferences and acceptance of “visual” PSEA such as portion pots/cups to estimate appropriate PS of amorphous grain foods such as breakfast cereals, pasta and rice. Concise information from a reputable source in relation to gender, age and activity level should accompany PSEA.",
keywords = "Consumer, Energy intake, Obesity, Portion size",
author = "Faulkner, {Gemma P.} and B. Livingstone and Pourshahidi, {L. Kirsty} and Michelle Spence and Moira Dean and Sinead O'Brien and Gibney, {Eileen R.} and Wallace, {Julie M.W.} and McCaffrey, {Tracy A.} and Kerr, {Maeve A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.027",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "200--208",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of portion size estimation aids

T2 - Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness

AU - Faulkner, Gemma P.

AU - Livingstone, B.

AU - Pourshahidi, L. Kirsty

AU - Spence, Michelle

AU - Dean, Moira

AU - O'Brien, Sinead

AU - Gibney, Eileen R.

AU - Wallace, Julie M.W.

AU - McCaffrey, Tracy A.

AU - Kerr, Maeve A.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Objective This qualitative study aimed to investigate consumer opinions on the usefulness of portion size estimation aids (PSEA); consumer preferences in terms of format and context for use; and the level of detail of guidance considered necessary for the effective application of PSEA. Design Six focus groups (three to eight participants per group) were conducted to elicit views on PSEA. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by two independent researchers using a template approach. Setting The focus groups were conducted in 2013 by an experienced moderator in various sites across the island of Ireland (three in the Republic of Ireland and three in Northern Ireland) including local leisure, community and resource centres; the home environment; and a university meeting room. Participants General population, males (n = 17) and females (n = 15) aged 18–64 years old. Participants were recruited from both urban and rural locations representing a range of socio-economic groups. Results The majority of participants deemed the coloured portion pots and disposable plastic cup (household measures) to be useful particularly for the estimation of amorphous cereal products (e.g. breakfast cereals). Preferences were evident for “visual” PSEA (reference objects, household measures and food packaging) rather than ‘quantities and measures’ such as weighing in grams or ounces. Participants stated that PS education should be concise, consistent, from a reputable source, initiated at school age and communicated innovatively e.g. mobile app or TV advertisement. Guidance in relation to gender, age and activity level was favoured over a “one size fits all” approach. Conclusions This study identified consumer preferences and acceptance of “visual” PSEA such as portion pots/cups to estimate appropriate PS of amorphous grain foods such as breakfast cereals, pasta and rice. Concise information from a reputable source in relation to gender, age and activity level should accompany PSEA.

AB - Objective This qualitative study aimed to investigate consumer opinions on the usefulness of portion size estimation aids (PSEA); consumer preferences in terms of format and context for use; and the level of detail of guidance considered necessary for the effective application of PSEA. Design Six focus groups (three to eight participants per group) were conducted to elicit views on PSEA. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by two independent researchers using a template approach. Setting The focus groups were conducted in 2013 by an experienced moderator in various sites across the island of Ireland (three in the Republic of Ireland and three in Northern Ireland) including local leisure, community and resource centres; the home environment; and a university meeting room. Participants General population, males (n = 17) and females (n = 15) aged 18–64 years old. Participants were recruited from both urban and rural locations representing a range of socio-economic groups. Results The majority of participants deemed the coloured portion pots and disposable plastic cup (household measures) to be useful particularly for the estimation of amorphous cereal products (e.g. breakfast cereals). Preferences were evident for “visual” PSEA (reference objects, household measures and food packaging) rather than ‘quantities and measures’ such as weighing in grams or ounces. Participants stated that PS education should be concise, consistent, from a reputable source, initiated at school age and communicated innovatively e.g. mobile app or TV advertisement. Guidance in relation to gender, age and activity level was favoured over a “one size fits all” approach. Conclusions This study identified consumer preferences and acceptance of “visual” PSEA such as portion pots/cups to estimate appropriate PS of amorphous grain foods such as breakfast cereals, pasta and rice. Concise information from a reputable source in relation to gender, age and activity level should accompany PSEA.

KW - Consumer

KW - Energy intake

KW - Obesity

KW - Portion size

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016828396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016828396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.027

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 28336467

AN - SCOPUS:85016828396

VL - 114

SP - 200

EP - 208

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -