An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth

Ashfaq Akram, Maher D. Fuad Fuad, Ulfat Bashir, Nagendran Jayavel Pandiyan, Kalyan Chakravathy, Thirupathi Rao Vishnumukkala, M. Madléna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A new tooth notation system records primary tooth classes and their types by letters 'dI, dC, dM' termed as ANAASEA letters and numbers (1,2) called as TOT digits respectively. The TOT digits are printed as superscript and subscript at both right and left sides of ANAASEA letters to indicate upper and lower teeth respectively. The new method is called MICAP (M-molar, I-incisor, C-canine, P- premolar) system. To assess the clinical application of new tooth notation by dental health professionals. Study design was cross sectional and tool was mock e dental chart based on MICAP format. The study participants were dental health professionals (N=225) who were divided into group A [dental specialists (n=44), dentists (n=60)] and group B [dental assistants (n=58), dental hygienists (n=38), dental technicians (n=25)]. They were demonstrated by video on MICAP format before they identified five primary teeth; three teeth to be written from word form to MICAP format and two teeth vice versa. Simple logistic regression and Pearson chi-square tests were performed to analyse the data. From group A, specialists performed significantly better (p value = 0.031) as compared to dentists in correct writing of 'deciduous maxillary right canine' into MICAP format [#1dC]. From group B, dental hygienists had significantly higher association in correct translation of [#2dM] as 'deciduous mandibular right 2nd molar' compared to dental assistants (P value =0.043). Furthermore, dental technicians compared to dental assistants significantly performed better (p value =0.047) in writing 'deciduous mandibular left central incisor' into MICAP format [#dI1]. Majority of dental health professionals were able to translate and write MICAP format. Doctors were better than paramedics. However, reliability of the new system requires additional data. Further research is recommended to compare MICAP notation with currently used notations such as FDI & Universal systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-14
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of International Dental and Medical Research
Volume8
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Deciduous Tooth
Incisor
Bicuspid
Tooth
Canidae
Dental Assistants
Dental Technicians
Dental Hygienists
Dentists
Health
Allied Health Personnel
Chi-Square Distribution
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Canine
  • Dental charting
  • Incisor
  • Molar
  • Primary teeth
  • Tooth notation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Akram, A., Fuad Fuad, M. D., Bashir, U., Pandiyan, N. J., Chakravathy, K., Rao Vishnumukkala, T., & Madléna, M. (2015). An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 8(1), 7-14.

An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth. / Akram, Ashfaq; Fuad Fuad, Maher D.; Bashir, Ulfat; Pandiyan, Nagendran Jayavel; Chakravathy, Kalyan; Rao Vishnumukkala, Thirupathi; Madléna, M.

In: Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2015, p. 7-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akram, A, Fuad Fuad, MD, Bashir, U, Pandiyan, NJ, Chakravathy, K, Rao Vishnumukkala, T & Madléna, M 2015, 'An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth', Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7-14.
Akram A, Fuad Fuad MD, Bashir U, Pandiyan NJ, Chakravathy K, Rao Vishnumukkala T et al. An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2015;8(1):7-14.
Akram, Ashfaq ; Fuad Fuad, Maher D. ; Bashir, Ulfat ; Pandiyan, Nagendran Jayavel ; Chakravathy, Kalyan ; Rao Vishnumukkala, Thirupathi ; Madléna, M. / An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth. In: Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 7-14.
@article{a5ae052344e549878bf1a6f8c76a3a7b,
title = "An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth",
abstract = "A new tooth notation system records primary tooth classes and their types by letters 'dI, dC, dM' termed as ANAASEA letters and numbers (1,2) called as TOT digits respectively. The TOT digits are printed as superscript and subscript at both right and left sides of ANAASEA letters to indicate upper and lower teeth respectively. The new method is called MICAP (M-molar, I-incisor, C-canine, P- premolar) system. To assess the clinical application of new tooth notation by dental health professionals. Study design was cross sectional and tool was mock e dental chart based on MICAP format. The study participants were dental health professionals (N=225) who were divided into group A [dental specialists (n=44), dentists (n=60)] and group B [dental assistants (n=58), dental hygienists (n=38), dental technicians (n=25)]. They were demonstrated by video on MICAP format before they identified five primary teeth; three teeth to be written from word form to MICAP format and two teeth vice versa. Simple logistic regression and Pearson chi-square tests were performed to analyse the data. From group A, specialists performed significantly better (p value = 0.031) as compared to dentists in correct writing of 'deciduous maxillary right canine' into MICAP format [#1dC]. From group B, dental hygienists had significantly higher association in correct translation of [#2dM] as 'deciduous mandibular right 2nd molar' compared to dental assistants (P value =0.043). Furthermore, dental technicians compared to dental assistants significantly performed better (p value =0.047) in writing 'deciduous mandibular left central incisor' into MICAP format [#dI1]. Majority of dental health professionals were able to translate and write MICAP format. Doctors were better than paramedics. However, reliability of the new system requires additional data. Further research is recommended to compare MICAP notation with currently used notations such as FDI & Universal systems.",
keywords = "Canine, Dental charting, Incisor, Molar, Primary teeth, Tooth notation",
author = "Ashfaq Akram and {Fuad Fuad}, {Maher D.} and Ulfat Bashir and Pandiyan, {Nagendran Jayavel} and Kalyan Chakravathy and {Rao Vishnumukkala}, Thirupathi and M. Madl{\'e}na",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "7--14",
journal = "Journal of International Dental and Medical Research",
issn = "1309-100X",
publisher = "Ektodermal Displazi Grubu",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of clinical application of a new tooth notation for primary teeth

AU - Akram, Ashfaq

AU - Fuad Fuad, Maher D.

AU - Bashir, Ulfat

AU - Pandiyan, Nagendran Jayavel

AU - Chakravathy, Kalyan

AU - Rao Vishnumukkala, Thirupathi

AU - Madléna, M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A new tooth notation system records primary tooth classes and their types by letters 'dI, dC, dM' termed as ANAASEA letters and numbers (1,2) called as TOT digits respectively. The TOT digits are printed as superscript and subscript at both right and left sides of ANAASEA letters to indicate upper and lower teeth respectively. The new method is called MICAP (M-molar, I-incisor, C-canine, P- premolar) system. To assess the clinical application of new tooth notation by dental health professionals. Study design was cross sectional and tool was mock e dental chart based on MICAP format. The study participants were dental health professionals (N=225) who were divided into group A [dental specialists (n=44), dentists (n=60)] and group B [dental assistants (n=58), dental hygienists (n=38), dental technicians (n=25)]. They were demonstrated by video on MICAP format before they identified five primary teeth; three teeth to be written from word form to MICAP format and two teeth vice versa. Simple logistic regression and Pearson chi-square tests were performed to analyse the data. From group A, specialists performed significantly better (p value = 0.031) as compared to dentists in correct writing of 'deciduous maxillary right canine' into MICAP format [#1dC]. From group B, dental hygienists had significantly higher association in correct translation of [#2dM] as 'deciduous mandibular right 2nd molar' compared to dental assistants (P value =0.043). Furthermore, dental technicians compared to dental assistants significantly performed better (p value =0.047) in writing 'deciduous mandibular left central incisor' into MICAP format [#dI1]. Majority of dental health professionals were able to translate and write MICAP format. Doctors were better than paramedics. However, reliability of the new system requires additional data. Further research is recommended to compare MICAP notation with currently used notations such as FDI & Universal systems.

AB - A new tooth notation system records primary tooth classes and their types by letters 'dI, dC, dM' termed as ANAASEA letters and numbers (1,2) called as TOT digits respectively. The TOT digits are printed as superscript and subscript at both right and left sides of ANAASEA letters to indicate upper and lower teeth respectively. The new method is called MICAP (M-molar, I-incisor, C-canine, P- premolar) system. To assess the clinical application of new tooth notation by dental health professionals. Study design was cross sectional and tool was mock e dental chart based on MICAP format. The study participants were dental health professionals (N=225) who were divided into group A [dental specialists (n=44), dentists (n=60)] and group B [dental assistants (n=58), dental hygienists (n=38), dental technicians (n=25)]. They were demonstrated by video on MICAP format before they identified five primary teeth; three teeth to be written from word form to MICAP format and two teeth vice versa. Simple logistic regression and Pearson chi-square tests were performed to analyse the data. From group A, specialists performed significantly better (p value = 0.031) as compared to dentists in correct writing of 'deciduous maxillary right canine' into MICAP format [#1dC]. From group B, dental hygienists had significantly higher association in correct translation of [#2dM] as 'deciduous mandibular right 2nd molar' compared to dental assistants (P value =0.043). Furthermore, dental technicians compared to dental assistants significantly performed better (p value =0.047) in writing 'deciduous mandibular left central incisor' into MICAP format [#dI1]. Majority of dental health professionals were able to translate and write MICAP format. Doctors were better than paramedics. However, reliability of the new system requires additional data. Further research is recommended to compare MICAP notation with currently used notations such as FDI & Universal systems.

KW - Canine

KW - Dental charting

KW - Incisor

KW - Molar

KW - Primary teeth

KW - Tooth notation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930325377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930325377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 7

EP - 14

JO - Journal of International Dental and Medical Research

JF - Journal of International Dental and Medical Research

SN - 1309-100X

IS - 1

ER -